User talk:Nineteen Ninety-Four guy

DYK for Jemma Mitchell case

On 7 November 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Jemma Mitchell case, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that the sentencing phase of the Jemma Mitchell case was the second to be filmed in England and Wales since a change in the law permitted television cameras into court? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Jemma Mitchell case. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Jemma Mitchell case), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 7 November 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Dawn of the Dead (2004 film)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Dawn of the Dead (2004 film) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of MyCatIsAChonk -- MyCatIsAChonk (talk) 18:21, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Dawn of the Dead (2004 film)

The article Dawn of the Dead (2004 film) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Dawn of the Dead (2004 film) for comments about the article, and Talk:Dawn of the Dead (2004 film)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of MyCatIsAChonk -- MyCatIsAChonk (talk) 17:40, 29 December 2022 (UTC)

Second GA nom for Shin Ultraman

Hello, I just wanted to inform you that I've gone by your advice and nominated the article for a peer review, and fixed it up as best I could and re-nominated it for a second GA review (as the peer reviewer and I both thought the page was ready for a second nomination). - Eiga-Kevin2 (talk) 03:03, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Power Duo on America's Got Talent.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Power Duo on America's Got Talent.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 04:30, 29 January 2023 (UTC)

DYK for Dawn of the Dead (2004 film)

On 10 February 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Dawn of the Dead (2004 film), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that during the filming of Dawn of the Dead, hundreds of extras in zombie makeup had to be on constant standby, so the crew built a "factory" where painted extras were on-call? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Dawn of the Dead (2004 film). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Dawn of the Dead (2004 film)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

-- RoySmith (talk) 00:03, 10 February 2023 (UTC)

August 2023 Good Article Nominations backlog drive

Good article nominations | August 2023 Backlog Drive
August 2023 Backlog Drive: On 1 August, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. (t · c) buidhe 05:15, 30 July 2023 (UTC)

File:Lucy Letby mugshot.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Lucy Letby mugshot.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Schwede66 21:41, 18 August 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Lucy Letby mugshot.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Lucy Letby mugshot.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:21, 21 August 2023 (UTC)

I have placed this file on Lucy Letby page. Thanks to you for upload this file. Manchesterunited1234 (talk) 17:36, 21 August 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Lucy Letby mugshot.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Lucy Letby mugshot.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. — RAVENPVFF · talk · 16:04, 4 September 2023 (UTC)

Hello – just to add that the file has been superseded by the same mugshot image except as a JPG image, and with a more conventional portrait crop. Thanks — RAVENPVFF · talk · 16:06, 4 September 2023 (UTC)

September 2023

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Danny Masterson. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. It should go without saying that you don't get to unilaterally decide a matter that you know is being discussed at an article's Talk page. You are welcome to join the discussion. DonIago (talk) 04:18, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

@Doniago: honestly, you're just splitting hairs over this edit. Your rationale only stems from the fact that Danny Boy is going to appeal his conviction and therefore should not be immediately treated as a felon because he could be innocent. May I remind you that it is not Wikipedia's job to sympathize with living persons reported in their articles? Our task is to objectively discuss living persons based upon reliable sources about them. Since Danny Boy has been convicted of decades-old sex crimes, we shall treat him as a sex offender at the beginning of the article; the fact he's going to appeal is irrelevant. If Danny Boy does prevail in his appeal, then we can treat him as a former actor. Until then, he remains a convicted sex offender. Period. Nineteen Ninety-Four guy (talk) 06:17, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

Feel free to raise your concerns at the article's Talk page, where there is already an ongoing discussion. DonIago (talk) 06:50, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

Replaceable non-free use File:John Gatins, Leprechaun 3.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:John Gatins, Leprechaun 3.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 26 September 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

March 2024 GAN backlog drive

Good article nominations | March 2024 Backlog Drive
March 2024 Backlog Drive: On 1 March, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here or ask questions here.
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year.

(t · c) buidhe 02:39, 23 February 2024 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Flypaper (1998 film)

Hello! Your submission of Flypaper (1998 film) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 13:22, 14 March 2024 (UTC)

DYK for Flypaper (1998 film)

On 3 April 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Flypaper (1998 film), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that TV Guide criticized Flypaper as among the "second-rate rip-offs" of Tarantino's Pulp Fiction? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Flypaper (1998 film). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Flypaper (1998 film)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Schwede66 00:46, 3 April 2024 (UTC)

Your WP:RX request

Hey! It is rather unfortunate that RX seems suboptimal if you are looking for 1990s–2000s pop culture-related magazines, these requests seemingly never get fulfilled. Anyway, in your case, I was able to find Fangoria issues in question. I must have missed your request while it was still there, sorry for that. Sent you a wikimail. AstonishingTunesAdmirer 連絡 16:04, 7 April 2024 (UTC)

Re: RPGamer

While I'm not entirely keen on Exdeath getting the DIY nom because I'm still working on it and that fellow kinda just did their own thing randomly, the comment about RPGamer felt weird. It's a reliable source according to WP:VG/S, and the person cited is staff. Kung Fu Man (talk) 06:00, 10 April 2024 (UTC)

@Kung Fu Man: I see. Perhaps you should have informed the DYK moderators about it in the nom page before an editor could make a review; given the massive backlog DYK is currently in, the last thing it needs is another aimless nomination. But I appreciate you pointing me in the right direction, and I'm sorry the nominator didn't bother crediting you as the "mainspace mover" on the DYK at the very least. Nineteen Ninety-Four guy (talk) 06:13, 10 April 2024 (UTC)

I assumed incorrectly that the "Author" was for the DYK and not the article, sorry for that. Given that the field is in between the fields for the DYK and not the article, I imagine others have made that mistake though. detria^skies 16:40, 10 April 2024 (UTC)

Also while I am here, calling it a aimless nomination doesn't feel great! I am just a new editor trying to do things in good faith, and figured it was a good and well written article to try a new thing with. detria^skies 16:49, 10 April 2024 (UTC)

DetriaSkies, while I can appreciate you calling me out on not having assumed good faith as you say, that doesn't change the fact that you didn't familiarize yourself with the DYK guidelines properly before impulsively nominating the Exdeath article, which you even insisted that it be nominated despite the fact it was still a work in progress. But to answer your question in your talk, WP:DYKCOMPLETE requires that nominations be reasonably complete and not some sort of work in progress, and that means no maintenance templates on expansion or anything that would prevent the article from getting featured in the Main page for that matter. Please read Wikipedia:Did you know/Guidelines properly this time. Nineteen Ninety-Four guy (talk) 17:40, 10 April 2024 (UTC)

Alright, thank you for clearing that up! detria^skies 17:42, 10 April 2024 (UTC)

DYK for First Shift (film)

On 28 April 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article First Shift (film), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Uwe Boll has described his 2024 crime drama film First Shift as the least violent in his body of work? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/First Shift (film). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, First Shift (film)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

—Ganesha811 (talk) 00:02, 28 April 2024 (UTC)