User talk:Nickerss

Hi[edit]

Hi my name is jesse

You used the {{helpme}} tag but did not ask a question. Please write out your question and replace the {{helpme}} tag when you are done, and someone will be along to help. Alternatively, you can ask your question at the new contributors help desk, the help desk, or join the #wikipedia-en-help IRC help channel to get real-time assistance. Click here for instant access.

I Am not sure how to get a guest book.

Your recent edits[edit]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 21:27, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Help[edit]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Hi I do not knowe how to get around please help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nickerss (talk • contribs)

A good place to start is Help:Contents. --Chris (talk) 22:13, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

In response to your feedback[edit]

Well, if you don't know what to do, just read an article that sounds interesting to you, or click here for a random article, or click here for funny stuff.

Agent 78787 ^{talk contribs} 22:56, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

how do you make link so people can send you a message.

Well, anyone can send you a message by coming to your talk page and leaving a note, so you could provide a link to your talk page. Like all links to internal Wikipedia pages, it is made by copying the title of the page and placing doubled brackets around it. Thus [[User talk:Nickerss]] becomes a link to User talk:Nickerss which is how people can contact you. If you are thinking of email, you need to go to your preferences, confirm an email address in there, then click the box for "Enable e-mail from other users". Then others will see a link for "E=mail this user" in the dropdown toolbox when they visit your userpage or user talk page. Finally, I note that you are not signing you posts. A message was left for you above about this. When you do sign, the software will automatically create a link to your talk page as part of your signature (unless you change certain preference setting). If none of the above covers what you are asking about, please clarify.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 00:24, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ERROR: Please enter the username parameter when using the {{Talkback}} template - thus {{Talkback|<username>}}. Hi want to be friendsNickerss (talk) 00:21, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Nickerss. You have new messages at Fuhghettaboutit's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Thanks for the help. Want to Be friends.

Barnstar[edit]

Hi Nickerss. Many thanks for the barnstar, I'm flattered but a bit puzzled. What did you see that you liked? Skinsmoke (talk) 02:36, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Which article/page? Skinsmoke (talk) 03:44, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Have replied at User talk:Skinsmoke. Skinsmoke (talk) 03:57, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Warning - March 2012[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use talk pages for inappropriate discussion, you may be blocked from editing.

You have been warned before about not to socialise on Wikipedia. Please listen to advice of other editors, I learnt myself it's the right thing to do. --Chip123456 (talk) 19:46, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

I have replied to your message on my talk page. Please read it for information. --Chip123456 (talk) 20:17, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have more comments on my talk page. --Chip123456 (talk) 20:49, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

March 2012[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for using Wikipedia as a social network in a manner contrary to your own safety. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 20:52, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nickerss (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Im sorry im going to get someone to adopt me.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. CharlieEchoTango (contact) 21:07, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Note to reviewing admin: please consult an oversighter before accepting an unblock request from this user. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 21:05, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I appoligize What i have done.I understand.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nickerss (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I appoligize for everything. I understand what I did.Nickerss (talk) 21:59, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Based on the oversighted diffs I do not think you should be unblocked for some time. — Daniel Case (talk) 05:53, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I'm not sure you do understand whatsoever. Do you realize that regular admins cannot unblock you, partly because of the overall level of problems you have caused? An unblock request won't go far, especially if you clearly have not read WP:GAB. I would recommend you contact WP:BASC in order to try and become unblocked, as this request above will be unsuccessful - especially when you tried to hide a statement (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 23:16, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nickerss, I would strongly suggest you wait to be unblocked. I myself have been blocked before and after a while I started to fully understand why I myself had been blocked, so the good thing to do is wait. --Chip123456 (talk) 07:54, 6 March 2012 (UTC) q And you did have a previous warning as well, which was still on your page so you could see what you were doing wrong. --Chip123456 (talk) 07:56, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I do not see at all how you were "trying to get someone to adopt you". Wikipedia is not MySpace, Facebook, nor a social network or any site for socializing, and you were blocked for treating it like one. Your talk page messages clearly show you knew what you were doing wrong, but you ignored them. Given that, I do not feel you will be unblocked anytime soon. --B music ian 15:05, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I also would like to say that on User talk:Skinsmoke you did ask a rather personal question of where they were from. In future you must refrain from asking these sorts of questions and must always use talk pages to contact the editor if you are unsure of something, related to Wikipedia. Not to find out where they live, not to have a catch up and definitely as said before, not as a social networking site. I strongly recommend you completely familiarise your self with the talk page guidelines to understand how to use them and, how not to use them. --Chip123456 (talk) 15:52, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nickerss (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

original unblock reason

Decline reason:

Based on the nature of the block, and the oversighted edits, you have already been advised to contact WP:BASC for unblocking. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 22:24, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You have been blocked from editing your talkpage due to abuse of the unblock process. You may still contest any current block by e-mailing unblock-en-l, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

(talk→ BWilkins ←track) 22:24, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nickerss (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I apoliagize of what I did I swear I wont do it again swear. Please unblock me. Nickerss (talk) 22:24, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You have failed to read the responses above from other administrators. You have already been advised to contact WP:BASC to be unblocked. Do that. Do not post repeated unblock requests here that say nothing new. If you do it again, your talk page access will be revoked. ~Amatulić (talk) 22:39, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblocking Requests[edit]

Is there much point of you being unblocked at this point in time? A couple of days ago, when you tried to socialise with me on my talk page, you said you didn't like editing .... I don't think that would have changed in a couple of days, so in theory your asking an administrator to unblock you so you can.....? Well I don't actually know why you are.--Chip123456 (talk) 16:00, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wait until you have fully understood, there is no point in saying you have, until you actually have. --Chip123456 (talk) 16:00, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

THANK YOU!!!![edit]

THANK YOU SO MUCH DEAR NICKERSS FOR GIVING ME A STAR!!!! Very best wishes, Sausa Sausa (talk) 19:31, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]