User talk:Nerdfiles

Welcome!

Hello, Nerdfiles, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Cinemechanica, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! SchuminWeb (Talk) 01:44, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Cinemechanica[edit]

A tag has been placed on Cinemechanica requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. SchuminWeb (Talk) 01:44, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Blerd[edit]

The article Blerd has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:NEOLOGISM

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. m'encarta (t) 17:54, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Blerd[edit]

Hello, Nerdfiles. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Blerd, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Ad Orientem (talk) 18:53, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Blerd[edit]

Hello, Nerdfiles,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Blerd should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blerd .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, Ad Orientem (talk) 22:21, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 23[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Game logic, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cognetics. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:13, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Priority of mind[edit]

Hi. Your draft was (accidentally, I assume) created in main article space instead of in draft space. I moved it to Draft:Priority of mind. Please continue to work on it in that location. Thanks. -- RoySmith (talk) 22:50, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Priority of mind has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Priority of mind. Thanks! Legacypac (talk) 03:10, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Priority of mind has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Priority of mind. Thanks! Basie (talk) 20:41, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Priority of mind (June 13)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

This submission appears to be taken from https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:eppdPSlQKnsJ:https://medium.com/%40thenerdfiles/priority-of-mind-4d0a82a2dc6b+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=nz. Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure. Note to reviewers: do not leave copyright violations sitting in the page history. Please follow the instructions here.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

Draft:Priority of mind may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

» Shadowowl | talk 09:09, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Nerdfiles! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! » Shadowowl | talk 09:09, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]