User talk:Neophaedrus

Nomination of Frank Doyle (ex-FBI agent) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Frank Doyle (ex-FBI agent) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frank Doyle (ex-FBI agent) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. TBr and ley 17:57, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relevance[edit]

Please do not add irrelevant content to articles. The content added here is not at all relevant to MythBusters and has no place being in the article. It is included in the Judi Bari article where it is relevant and does not need to be in other articles unless it is directly relevant to the subject. --AussieLegend (✉) 17:59, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It would be good if you did some research before making suggestions. Your earlier comment is clearly in error:

"Delete - Changing my vote based on a re-read of the article. I agree with Nutster's assessment. There is virtually nothing in this article that would suit a BLP on Frank Doyle. Unless I missed something, there's not even a direct link between the MythBusters Frank Doyle and the Frank Doyle associated with Judi Bari, other than a single mention in the first sentence. This is an article best created from scratch. -- AussieLegend (✉) 03:46, 21 October 2012 (UTC)"

His botched (at best) investigation of the bari case puts his competence in question. Darryl Cherney has asked the Mythbusters program to investigate the Bari case, so the issue is relevant.

You also claim that since the material is covered in Bari article, it's redundant, but without links no one will see the connection. This is why Wikipedia and the WWW have hyperlinks.

thanks