User talk:NeilOnWiki

Welcome![edit]

Hello, NeilOnWiki, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Talk:Erlang (unit). I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! ~Kvng (talk) 16:24, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks @Kvng: for the warm welcome and the useful links. I think my best initial stratagem is to try to combine practical edits to Erlang (unit) (and its talk page) with frequent peeks at the copious info for new users — figuratively speaking, I need to make sure I'm moving my arms around, otherwise I'll drown. NeilOnWiki (talk) 19:29, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Help me! from reversion paralysis[edit]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Please help me with... the Radon–Nikodym theorem maths article. I'm wanting to avoid a slow-motion edit-war and seem to have ended up in paralysis.

An unnamed user edited the proof, which meant that when I came to read it (for the first time) shortly afterwards it seemed to me to be invalid. The previous version seemed basically okay, so I reverted the edit, adding an explanation at Talk:Radon–Nikodym theorem#Reverting proof to include Hahn decomposition. A while later, this was re-reverted anonymously by a different IP address (though quite possibly the same person), with no discussion.

At that point, I decided the best thing I could do was to add some extra detail to the Talk page expanding on my concerns, and to leave the main article untouched in the hope that a third editor might provide a fresh view. That was on 8 October 2020 and in the meantime nothing has happened. I'm not sure where best to go from here, so we end up with a reliable article. Any suggestions would be very welcome. Thanks, NeilOnWiki (talk) 18:33, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

NeilOnWiki, Hiya. Probably best to invite comment from WP:WikiProject_Mathematics by posting on their talk page. Best, Darren-M talk 20:41, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Sounds fair enough: I'll give it a go. NeilOnWiki (talk) 08:23, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]