User talk:Naruto Tron

Welcome[edit]

Hello, Naruto Tron, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. If you are looking for help, please do any of the following:

visit the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have
type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will answer your questions shortly
visit the directory of help pages

There are a lot of standards and policies here, but as long as you are editing in good faith, you are encouraged to be bold in updating pages. Here are a few links you might find useful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes (~~~~), which produces your name and the current date. Also, it would be a huge help if you could explain each of your edits with an edit summary. Again, welcome!--NAHID 20:07, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits[edit]

Please read the page history before restoring your edits. Your edit "didn't work" because others removed it. You don't need to label the sections as such. — Someguy0830 (T | C) 02:00, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Akatsuki[edit]

Oh. I'm sorry. The URL on your picture was messed up (you wrote "http://" twice), so I fixed it. I guess I didn't realize I was reverting your question too. o.o;—Ｌｏｖｅはドコ？ (talk • contribs) 22:05, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not a big deal just wanted to know what happened there. and thanks for trying to fix my URL.

Welcome to WikiProject External links[edit]

Thank you for joining WikiProject External links, a collaborative effort to have articles comply with Wikipedia's External links guidelines. Below are some ongoing tasks for you to take part in, or you can add a task to do. Another great place to check out is Category:Wikipedia external links cleanup. Happy editing, ( ar ky ) 01:32, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject External links tasks you can do:

WikiProject External links	This box: (watch • edit • changes • add / remove a task)
Open Tasks: Fix the broken links in the Featured Articles using the Checklinks tool Intelligent vehicle technologies (edit \| talk \| history \| protect \| delete \| links \| watch \| logs \| views) - Looking for a third opinion on some of the links in the article that appear to be commercial firms. Trying to avoid an edit war. Information Technology Infrastructure Library (edit \| talk \| history \| protect \| delete \| links \| watch \| logs \| views) There has been a long debate on external links to be included, third opinions invited in particular for the forum websites referenced that may be useful but are not discussed in the main article. Extreme pornography (edit \| talk \| history \| protect \| delete \| links \| watch \| logs \| views) This is about the term being used by the UK's Criminal Justice and Immigration Act 2008 but is obviously a controversial topic with a number of arguably useful pornographic example links added 2009 swine flu pandemic (edit \| talk \| history \| protect \| delete \| links \| watch \| logs \| views) As a hot news topic this article can suffer from excessive links from dubious un-official sources Model_View_ViewModel (edit \| talk \| history \| protect \| delete \| links \| watch \| logs \| views) The Open source MVVM frameworks section contains links to several products that would fail notability as having no coverage in independent sources, e.g. Mugen MVVM Toolkit. Is this linkspam? - Pointillist (talk) 09:28, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

My signature[edit]

Testing my signature --Naruto Tron 23:41, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Personal attack pages[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Travis, are considered vandalism and are immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 04:29, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Konan[edit]

That's not what the passage says, just your interpretation of it, which is original research. — Someguy0830 (T | C) 02:08, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My point is that what you see in the passage does not make it relevant, because it's not what the passage says. Literally, it just says that she supposedly died, actually didn't, and now is hot. Non-sequitor if I ever saw one. — Someguy0830 (T | C) 02:17, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Which, again, is your original research. Something is not made relevant simply because you can interpret it a certain way. Enecyclopedic entries aren't written like that. — Someguy0830 (T | C) 02:36, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

== peer review ==[edit]

I was wondering if you could take some time out of your schedule to head over to the Heroes (TV series) talkpage and give us an honest peer review. The page has gone through some major changes in the last few months, and it would be fantastic if a prominent editor/contributor like yourself, could head over and give us at the Heroes Wikiproject some sound opinion and ideas on improvements for the page. We have all worked very hard at improving the page, and we need great outside, reliable and trustworthy users to come over and help us improve. I you are interested in joining the peer review discussion with other prominent users/contributors, much like yourself, please follow the link. Thank you very much for your help and your continued effort to improve Wikipedia and its quality! Wikipedia:Peer review/Heroes (TV series)/archive2--Chrisisinchrist (talk) 05:19, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]