User talk:Modinyr

AE[edit]

You have been reported to Arbitration Enforcement. You can see this here. nableezy - 17:10, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

1RR/week restriction on the topic of the Arab-Israeli conflict[edit]

Please see this restriction which I am imposing per the discretionary sanctions under WP:ARBPIA. You are limited to one revert per 7-day period on any article or other content which relates to the Arab-Israeli conflict anywhere on Wikipedia, for a three-month period. You are also warned that this could be increased to a full topic ban by any admin if you continue to make reverts without appropriate discussion. See WP:Dispute resolution for the steps which you are expected to take if you get into an editing dispute. When a series of reverts extends over a long period of time, this is evidence that at least one of the parties is not waiting to reach a talk page consensus before reverting. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 02:09, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

past account[edit]

Earlier you said that this is your first registered account. So I am going to be a bit more blunt in the question. Are you or are you not the same person who operated the Lutrinae (talk · contribs) account? An honest answer may well be the end of this. I dont plan on asking that this account be blocked for evading the topic ban of Lutrinae, but a dishonest one (or no answer at all) may, no, will bring an entirely different reaction. nableezy - 19:49, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You and all the other POV warriors are such whiny hypocrits. Can't get past your biases. Again, harrassing an editor that you don't agree with so you can use the pathetically biased AE system. Look at the ridiculous AE charges. Lies and mischaracterazations, as well as a complete disregard for the identical actions of pro-pally editors.

Go fuck yourself Nableezy. I've finally realized that noone takes the pathetic posturing of wikipedia seriously, so of you blowharding POV around don't both me no more. Modinyr (talk) 04:00, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That above, combined with your moronic rant at Tiamut's page, has given me the necessary energy to see you blocked as a ban evading sock. Bye. Until your next account, which I can assure you I will take a greater interest in spotting from the start, at least. nableezy - 04:24, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The evidence for Lutrinae=Modinyr is here and here. Sean.hoyland - talk 08:52, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"from the start, at least." You mean you might respond BEFORE I start? What a moron. That wasn't a pathetic rant on Tiamut's page. Look at how you guys lavish praise on such a biased editor. And let her act like a martyr. She is some ivory tower whiner who likes to throw around words on wikipedia. She is as imaginary as the Palestinians themselves. Made up for convenience.

And sean, noone cares about you, sexpat. The evidence is that I mention Pattaya, and you thought I was talking about your wife (and made baseless accusations on the AE board, SOP). Why would mention of Pattaya make you think of your wife? Is that where you met her? Modinyr (talk) 19:01, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No, I meant that when you inevitably create your next account I will be more attentive and see to it that it is blocked much more quickly. Off to SPI, toodles. nableezy - 19:17, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

November 2011[edit]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at User:Tiamut, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 04:19, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, why don't you go back to editing List of African-American Pornographic Actors? Modinyr (talk) 19:03, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Acroterion (talk) 19:12, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Alexandria (talk) 20:38, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]