User talk:mjpam

Welcome!

Hello, Mjpam, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Granville number, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! — Arthur Rubin (talk) 23:18, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Granville number[edit]

The article Granville number has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

non-notable concept

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Granville numbers[edit]

Category:Granville numbers, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 23:18, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your two accounts[edit]

I was alerted of this through email, as I'm not in the habit of following your contributions when we aren't in dispute with each other. I don't have much to state about your changing accounts, other than that you be aware that if the old account came to community attention, or the topic is the subject of edit-wars and contentious editing, and especially if your old account was involved or your new account will be, then it may be seen as evading scrutiny not to disclose the old account, per Wikipedia:Clean start. The rest is also clear on this matter:

...where the old account is clearly discontinued and the new account is not merely continuing the same kinds of behaviors and activities.

If you have edited topics in the past, in a way that you would be seen as "involved", and you return to the same or similar issues under your new account, then editors may feel that awareness of the old account is needed in order to better understand how to see the actions of the new account.
...a user who then re-enters disputes and topics where their conduct was likely to be noticed (blocks, disputes, disruptive editing, contentious and edit warred topics, and the like) may be seen as evading scrutiny. The community would usually expect to know that the individual has a past involvement unless this was clearly not controversial, and especially if there is still non-trivial involvement or involvement in disputes or editing controversies. Clean start is not a means to resume similar conduct while concealing a past track record.

This means that if you are going to continue the same type of editing/disputes at the Frot article, you should not have changed accounts. If your having this new account means no more of the same edits and disputes with me at the Frot article, then good. If it means having "clean contributions" while resuming the same type of actions at the Frot article, after I stated that you are a single purpose account (largely involved in only one article -- Frot), then not good.

I will go ahead and tag your old account as retired, since that is what should be done in the case of fresh starts...if you are not willing to disclose on that user page that it is a past account of Mjpam. Whether you want it disclosed on your old or new account that you are both the same person is up to you, of course. Flyer22 (talk) 18:15, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I replied on my talk page. Flyer22 (talk) 16:23, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reference tags[edit]

When you are adding footnote references to articles such as perfect number, please make sure you are familiar with the guidelines regarding reference tags and punctuation at WP:REFPUNC. In particular, a reference tag at the end of a sentence must be placed after the period or full stop, not before. Gandalf61 (talk) 08:38, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]