User talk:MikoyanG21

Welcome[edit]

File:Verifiability and Neutral point of view (Common Craft)-en.ogv

A video showing the basics of verifiability and neutral point of view policies.

Welcome!

Hello, MikoyanG21, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like Wikipedia and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! - Ahunt (talk) 14:16, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Far too biased positive information about the aircraft. Very little in the way of development problems, performance issues or cost blow outs. Considered not a balanced viewpoint.[edit]

MikoyanG21 (talk) 14:34, 18 March 2016 (UTC) Warning removed due to no refs about problems, despite lines in the dev section about how the program was classified secret. I have a problem with the Perfect Aircraft™ especially when the wiki section simply lauds its praises. Its so obviously a sales pitch... every other aircraft ever designed had issues to be resolved, but not this one if you believe the wiki page. Apparently if you keep things secret, noone is permitted to disagree with you....[reply]

March 2016[edit]

Hello, I'm McSly. I noticed that you made a change to an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. McSly (talk) 15:26, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Textron AirLand Scorpion. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. BilCat (talk) 15:48, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]