User talk:Memotype

Is it that easy?[edit]

Yes, it is that easy, welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome!

Hello, Memotype, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! — Dark Shikari ^talk/_contribs 04:12, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've answered your questions that you asked on my userpage: remember to put userpages' that you add to on your Watchlist (using the Watch this page button) so you can track responses to your questions and comments. — Dark Shikari ^talk/_contribs 04:22, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vegan but eats chili?[edit]

Hunh? Categorized as Vegan but is a carnivore and eats chili?! Am I missing something?! Or is one material and the other figurative? Jpaulm 23:52, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Heh, actually, it's just a mix up. I stole the code for the vegan userbox and changed it to carnivore, and I guess I forgot to change the category on it... :P I'll fix that right now :) —Memotype 01:16, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Libertarianism[edit]

Plus it is now true. I was just working on that when you did it for me. Thanks! Whis key Rebel lion 04:00, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Heh... I just stumbled across the debate on the talk page and thought the solution was rather obvious... —Memotype 04:02, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

anarchism[edit]

Hi, Memotype. Please stick around at anarchism. We need you. Thanks. Whis key Rebel lion 19:31, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'll be keeping my eye on it, but I'm not going to fight in any holy wars, and I can't guarantee that I'll be on any particular "side". Your usage of the word "we" scares me a bit, as I interpret it as a manifestation of an "us vs. them" mentality, which I will not participate in. —Memotype::T 19:50, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That was not a correct interpretation. I meant we as in all the editors on that article. I am actually not on any side either. If an-caps were the ones dominating the article and keeping a fair representation of communist-anarchism out, I would want fairness for the inclusion of communist anarchism. All I want is a real encyclopedia. (I am not an an-cap, btw.) Whis key Rebel lion 21:08, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That's good to hear... it's hard to tell these days on wp... —Memotype::T 13:39, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Anarcho-capitalism and free education[edit]

Well first off, thanks for visiting my Userpage. To answer your question: I would favor anarcho-capitalism as the best system. However, I also acknowledge that it isn't likely to form (at least in my lifetime) and education is an issue I feel strongly about. Now if you want to get into a debate about free education fitting anarcho-capitalism, I don't know that our talk-pages would fit it all lol. Soxwon (talk) 15:02, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Man-page[edit]

Template:Man-page has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. — This, that, and the other (talk) 06:24, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Dispute resolution discussion[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute in which you may have been involved. Content disputes can hold up article development, therefore we request your participation in the discussion to help find a resolution. The thread is "Men's Rights". Thank you! EarwigBot ^{operator / talk} 15:48, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:17, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Memotype. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Memotype. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked[edit]

You have been blocked for 48 hours for persistent rudeness, personal attacks and assumptions of bad faith in this discussion. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bishonen | tålk 09:16, 25 January 2024 (UTC).[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Memotype (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I didn't resort to rudeness or personal attacks much when speaking publicly

Decline reason:

Your block isn't for very much time. Yamla (talk) 14:54, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

January 2024[edit]

Answer this instead of circle jerking with the other editors is an utterly inappropriate personal attack that sexualizes your disagreement with other editors. Commenting later that you rarely talk that way does not obviate your offense. This is a warning. Refrain from all such obnoxious personal attacks on your colleagues. Cullen328 (talk) 08:22, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]