User talk:Megalophias

Ringmail[edit]

I don't know if he regards himself as an expert, I've sweated enough to know for sure that a broigne is not a victorian mistake, and to find citable sources for it. I understand that the English language world lacks proper history on the subject, but from a continental point of view, there's no mistake possible that ringmail is different from chainmail and was used in the period between the fall of Rome and the comeback of chainmail in the late 1100s. Also, the high handed way in which he remade all the article with no regard for the efforts of those who came before him, and without even setting up an account for people to discuss the matter with him was, to my view, qualification for vandalism.

I'm quite willing to include the bit about representations making it difficult to differenciate between chainmail and ringmail, and the possibility of misconceptions in the 1800s, but the basic matter as established with my collaboration stands, even if it has to be edited further. --Svartalf 11:50, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Huh, it's weird how the literature in different languages can disagree so much, eh? French Wikipedia says that a broigne is a leather shirt with iron rings, whereas many English sources equate broigne with byrnie, a mailshirt. Anyway, this is not my field, I just wanted to get a discussion going. I've left a link on your talk page, if you are willing. Megalophias 15:56, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

confusing broigne and byrnie is normal, given the fact that both words are almost certainly cognate. I'll check your message and get on with the talk.

I got disgusted with the fact that mr howard seems more in winning the argument, by using debate team histrionics and courtroom antics, rather than with having a serious argument. I must admit that, not knowing how much of an expert he really is, his gratuitous downplaying of authors who are generally regarded as authoritative made me want to puke on him. If I get more reason to respect him, and less to respect Mr Contamine, things may change.

crossbow[edit]

could you help a bit on the crossbow article. some Chinese nationalist is getting very nasty, deleting lots of stuff, just to emphasize it was INVENTED IN CHINA. He is not interested in more points about the crossbow (even that it was used in China... and how it was made). I think some real discussion is needed, because I don`t think its a good idea to rewrite wiki every week.

Thank you Wandalstouring

PS: you are perfectly right about armour. ringmail is usually worn over a vest of linen and was more casual dress than armour.

ARMA[edit]

This is a head's up that some anonymous user is trying to make changes to the criticism section of the Association for Renaissance Martial Arts article, using Amazon reviews as sources, and generally reverting many of the improvements that were made to the article recently. This user has not discussed any of these changes on the talk page. The Jade Knight 18:37, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

mangonel[edit]

I'm sorry but your claims in mangonel are unsourced. Please source them or I will have to revert them. Greetings Wandalstouring (talk) 08:35, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You're right. I don't have time for thsi task, but someone has to start it someday. Wandalstouring (talk) 10:36, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mangonel page edited[edit]

Hey I've done some serious changes to the magonel page, it looks like you know abuot it a lot, so if you could help me to improve it I would really appreciate it, thanks. Mbartelsm (talk) 06:39, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 31[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sarasvati River, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Faults (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:55, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 7[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sutlej, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Saraswati River (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:16, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Lazy[edit]

Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 06:42, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Emiran culture[edit]

The article Emiran culture has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Articles require references.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 10:03, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:38, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 2[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Haplogroup N-M231, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Qiang. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:58, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Megalophias. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Haplogroup K[edit]

Okay, K was apparently detected at frequencies of 10% in North Mozambique and at 1% in Maputo. The scientists also found K* and a few other West Asia and Europe-associated haplotypes, including R1b1-P25, R1a, J2b, T and E-M34. The R clade was highest in Central Mozambique (~7%) [1]. Cheers-- Soupforone (talk) 18:24, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! That's quite unexpected. Megalophias (talk) 20:39, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Megalophias. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Megalophias. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:06, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:21, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:06, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]