User talk:Maxj27

Genetically modified viruses[edit]

Hi Max.

Your changes look good. I would just copy your sandbox version over the current one, leaving the original categories though. Leave a detailed edit summary when you do so. I sg=hould warn you that the whole area of GMOs is under a thing we call discretionary sanctions. Basically in the past we have had a lot of disruption in this area which has lad to a case at Wikipedias highest level of arbitration which eventually resulted in an unique request for comment over the health aspects of GMOs. I will leave you a standard link about this. It doesn't imply you have done anything wrong, especially as you have not actually edited the main pages yet, but does let you know what you may be in for. Personally as a new user I would recommend starting in areas less volatile, although it has been relatively quiet for a while now. We do need fresh editors in this area, especially ones looking to edit beyond the are they safe/dangerous aspect, so I wish you luck and feel free to visit my talk page or leave a message at an articles talk page if you want any help. Regards AIRcorn (talk) 18:25, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in genetically modified organisms, commercially produced agricultural chemicals and the companies that produce them, broadly construed. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Hi Aircorn. Thanks for the advice and links you sent. I have tried to follow what you said, in making modest advancements on what is basically on the framing of the page. Hopefully this will aid both readers and people who want to advance the page in the future. I can see some factual inaccuracies lower down in the page, but will leave them for the moment. Thanks and please do say where I might have created rather than moved towards resolving issues. Cheers Maxj27 (talk) 20:25, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020[edit]

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Plön Evolution Path, from its old location at User:Maxj27/sandbox. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. - Rich^T|C|E-Mail 12:09, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Plön Evolution Path (September 5)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Plön Evolution Path and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Plön Evolution Path, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DGG ( talk ) 00:41, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Maxj27! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DGG ( talk ) 00:41, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Plön Evolution Path[edit]

Hello, Maxj27. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Plön Evolution Path, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. Bot0612 (talk) 11:37, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Plön Evolution Path has been accepted[edit]

Plön Evolution Path, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 16:41, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]