User talk:Matt.lohkamp

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hi. That was an accident, this is what the Allmusic review have: "Lyrically, though, his focus is slightly different, a focus on class as much as inner-city pressure (though he later said that the commonly accepted vision of the song being about rough trade was not the intent)...", I don't think Flight of the Conchords is aired here, well I never heard of it. Regards. Frcm1988 (talk) 03:36, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Aqualung[edit]

I didn't suggest the six chords had anything to do with Beethoven, Scott Allen Nollen did. He wrote that they "may well" demonstrate Anderson's interest in Beethoven. I have never heard that Anderson likes beethoven, but that doesn't imply that you or even Nollen himself haven't either. And if the chord isn't "revolutionary", you "might well" replace it for another that you like best, instead of deleting the reffered info.

Yes, it deserves a more thorough explanation and surely an alternate source to cite. So, I looked for another citation (which in my humble opinion, you should've) and found something really interesting - "One should note that Ian Anderson of Jethro Tull talks in a recent live release of Aqualung about the lead riff, which he says they wrote by rearranging the opening notes of Beethoven's Fifth Symphony, he went on to sing the notes of many other famous rock tunes and describe how they are also rearrangements of those notes."[1] Isn't it interesting that the guy knows something that we don't ? Unfortunately, I can't find this statement anywhere else, but that doesn't imply that it doesn't exisit, right ? Krenakarore (talk) 11:34, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Source[edit]

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference[edit]

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being 'minor'. The only thing that's changed is that you will no longer have them marked as minor by default.

For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you are familiar with the contents of WP:MINOR, and believe that it is still beneficial to the encyclopedia to have all your edits marked as such by default, then this discussion will give you the details you need to continue with this functionality indefinitely. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 21:30, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]