User talk:Matt. P
 | This user may have left Wikipedia. Matt. P has not edited Wikipedia since 25 November 2010. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Altocelarophobia, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at its talk page. Removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, but the article may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. CobaltBlueTony 17:34, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
- I'm not sure what you feel is patronizing or unhelpful: my comments here, or on the talk page of the article. The article message was related to the below message only. Your comment there, however, was definitely unhelpful. "Site proposed for deleteion," excuse me? What does that mean? You want to propose the deletion of the whole Wikipedia website because you didn't like my prod tagging? By all means, discuss it with me! Since you obviously do not wish to be seen as a "newbie" (and upon examination of your edit history it seems you are more prolific than it appears based on the total lack of messages on your talk page), you should recognize the distinction between content- and process-related discussions, and personal problems with other users. Addressing me as patronizing is a personal opinion, not an editing concern. I made no edits that were patronizing; I used appropriate user talk page templates. If that offends, I apologize, but again, you appeared new with no user talk page messages. - CobaltBlueTony 18:45, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
- I apologize form my poor use of English (I meant article instead of site) and merely fought "cute" was an unneccessary comment on it. I'm sure we can agree calmly on a way to settle the articles problems and I'm completely open to any constructive comments you or anyone else has. If these proves impossible, and there is no other interest in the article, then I will agree to its deletion. Matt. P 18:58, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
- I understand now that you are not a native English speaker. That definitely does change the meaning of your comment! As to my reaction being "unnecessary," that's open to interpretation. A mildly sarcastic comment (as yours originally appeared to be) is likely to invoke a mildly sarcastic response. Since that was not your intent, I retract my statement (as you have done for me in editing the talk page of the article. So, then, let's dispense with the breakdown in communication and focus on the article.
- First, you have no resources that identify this as a legitimate medically diagnosed phobia (let alone any sources at all). As a Wikipedian for approximately 8 months, I'm certain that you have come across the policy which explains and enforces the strict need for proper verifiable sourcing. Without a source, an article has no legitimacy.
- Second, my prod contains a link to the description of unstable neologisms in wikispeak, so that there should have given you something to think about. Certainly you may think a word is legitimate, or suitable for an article, but it must pass the standards for Wikipedia, thereafter on the opinions of the editors (you, me, and all the other users and admins). Perhaps you may have tried to read it, but had trouble with the English. If you give me yournative language, I can try to find this page or similar in your language so that you can get a better sense of the policy.
- CobaltBlueTony 19:30, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
Upon reading the links provided, I realise correctly that the site contains original research in that it contains neologisms and introduces an original idea which, although exists, I have not found any reliable sources. Therefore, I'm currently looking for reliable sources on the internet and, if unable to find any, there will be no other choice be to remove the offending article. Again my apologies for any rash comments I have made and will try to assume greater good faith in any criticisms. --Matt. P 21:52, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
- Duly noted. Advice well taken, and I'll try to do the same for seemingly sarcastic remarks I find in the future! Happy editing! - CobaltBlueTony 22:14, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
I haven't been able to find any sources so far, so the article is free now to be deleted. Matt. P 14:25, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LVII, November 2010[edit]
|
To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 22:52, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LVIII, December 2010[edit]
| |||
The Bugle: Volume LVIX, January 2011[edit]
|
To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 16:15, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LX, February 2011[edit]
|
To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 22:17, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LXI, March 2011[edit]
|
To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 04:09, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LXII, April 2011[edit]
|
To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 23:06, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LXIII, May 2011[edit]
|
To begin or stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 23:05, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LXIV, June 2011[edit]
|
To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. BrownBot (talk) 23:30, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LXV, July 2011[edit]
|
To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. BrownBot (talk) 22:36, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
Military Historian of the Year[edit]
Nominations for the "Military Historian of the Year" for 2011 are now open. If you would like to nominate an editor for this award, please do so here. Voting will open on 22 January and run for seven days. Thanks! On behalf of the coordinators, Nick-D (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 23:45, 15 January 2012 (UTC) You were sent this message because you are a listed as a member of the Military history WikiProject.
Military history coordinator election[edit]
The Military history WikiProject has started its 2012 project coordinator election process, where we will select a team of coordinators to organize the project over the coming year. If you would like to be considered as a candidate, please submit your nomination by 14 September. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact one of the current coordinators on their talk page. This message was delivered here because you are a member of the Military history WikiProject. – Military history coordinators (about the project • what coordinators do) 09:29, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
WikiProject Military history coordinator election[edit]
Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election, which will determine our coordinators for the next twelve months. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September! Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 22:15, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
WikiProject Military history coordinator election[edit]
Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 29 September. Yours, Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 05:22, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
User group for Military Historians[edit]
Greetings,
"Military history" is one of the most important subjects when speak of sum of all human knowledge. To support contributors interested in the area over various language Wikipedias, we intend to form a user group. It also provides a platform to share the best practices between military historians, and various military related projects on Wikipedias. An initial discussion was has been done between the coordinators and members of WikiProject Military History on English Wikipedia. Now this discussion has been taken to Meta-Wiki. Contributors intrested in the area of military history are requested to share their feedback and give suggestions at Talk:Discussion to incubate a user group for Wikipedia Military Historians.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:29, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive[edit]
Hey y'all, the April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive begins at 00:01 UTC on April 1, 2021 and runs through 23:59 UTC on April 31, 2021. Points can be earned through reviewing articles on the AutoCheck report, reviewing articles listed at WP:MILHIST/ASSESS, reviewing MILHIST-tagged articles at WP:GAN or WP:FAC, and reviewing articles submitted at WP:MILHIST/ACR. Service awards and barnstars are given for set points thresholds, and the top three finishers will receive further awards. To participate, sign up at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Military_History/April 2021 Reviewing Drive#Participants and create a worklist at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/April 2021 Reviewing Drive/Worklists (examples are given). Further details can be found at the drive page. Questions can be asked at the drive talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:22, 31 March 2021 (UTC)