User talk:Masterpk404

Unblock Requests[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Masterpk404 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have been falsely blocked by User:Materialscientist as a sock puppet of User:Timwikisidemen even though I'm not. The reason listed by User:RicherMan66 was that I added unsourced, promotional content and Possible COI to W2S. None of that is true, I haven't even made a single edit to W2S, I only took part in the discussion of article's entry for deletion.

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 14:17, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Masterpk404 (talk) 10:34, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Masterpk404 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm vaguely told again that I have been blocked for abusing multiple accounts/being a sockpuppet of User:zaydx and User:timwikisidemen. Once again, I DO NOT own multiple accounts. This is my only account. I know User:zaydx, I live with 6 other students, he's one of them. As for User:timwikisidemen, I don't even know him. I did not make any unsourced edit, promotional content and Possible COI to W2S, I didn't even make a single edit to W2S. All I did was took part in the discussion of article's entry for deletion. None of the things listed by User:RicherMan66 is true, the fact that I have been blocked with no definitive evidence by someone whose first edits includes him claiming to be a WP:SPA and file an SPI report is absurd.

Decline reason:

This is now a CheckUser block, meaning that there is technical evidence of the use of multiple accounts, so you will have to address this in any unblock request you make. I am declining this one. 331dot (talk) 21:04, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Here's the deal. Though User:timwikisidemen appears

Unrelated, both this account and User:Zaydx edited the same articles and talk pages. Both accounts edited KSI (entertainer) as well as Talk:KSI (entertainer). Also Sidemen. This alone is enough to have both accounts marked as abusive sockpuppets. I'm not averse to unblocking if commitments can be made to prevent any overlapping of the roommate accounts. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 00:14, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, but every edit I have done on those pages is legitimate, its not vandalism or breaking any rules. I live with 6 students, why am I blocked if one of them has made edits to the same page I did ?

The other reason listed by User:RicherMan66 is that I added "unsourced edit, promotional content and Possible COI" to W2S which is also false. I didn't even make a single edit to W2S. - Masterpk404 (talk) 13:27, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

RicherMan66 is a long term abuser and was trying to set you up. That account is now blocked. Unfortunately, the report found the problem with your roommate account. The content of his report is not relevant and was not the reason you were blocked, so don't worry about the lies. The important thing is that you avoid even the appearance of collaboration with other accounts on your IP. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 16:02, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've already said multiple times this is my only account and I shouldn't be held responsible about the fact that one of the six students that I live with has made edits to the same page I did.

Every edit I have made to any person's wiki page has been legitimate and factual. I like editing. What should do I now ? I'm lost. - Masterpk404 (talk) 07:17, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Well, you need to figure it out. You need to make a point of avoiding editing the same articles as your roommates. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 15:58, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Masterpk404 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

As I've already explained User:zaydx is one of the six students that I live with. He has made edits on the same page as me in the past. This won't happen again in the future.

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. Yamla (talk) 11:25, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Masterpk404 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

As I've explained in the previous three unblock requests, User:zaydx is one of the six students that I live with. We live in the same hostel using computer provided to us by our college. He has made edits on the same page as me in the past and I think he has broken few other rules too. The point is I just feel like I have been blocked and remained blocked for almost a month mainly because of the mistakes he made and I wish to be unblocked. If I've done anything on my own, it won't happen again in the future. I just wanna edit. That's it, this is my final unblock request.Masterpk404 (talk) 07:16, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. Yamla (talk) 16:12, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.