User talk:Mark 2000

Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2006-05-02 Chuck Berry[edit]

Aloha. I have chosen to mediate Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2006-05-02 Chuck Berry. User:Dr. Gonzo has left on wikibreak, so I'm not sure how much progress we can make without him. —Viriditas | Talk 05:11, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please see User talk:Dr.Gonzo for an update on mediation status. —Viriditas | Talk 01:45, 8 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, Mark, thanks for the message, and no, you're not bothering me at all. Just to be clear, I'm not entirely sure it's a good idea to give up on mediation just yet. Would you be willing to give it a go for another week? The reason I ask, is because I don't think the issue is resolved. You don't exactly have to do anything just yet, but if you could be willing to negotiate with Dr.Gonzo, if and when he decides the issue is resolved (along with you of course) I would really appreciate it. It would be great if we could get the both of you to come to some kind of an agreement. What do you think, is it worth your time? —Viriditas | Talk 09:23, 8 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Well, I think that as long as you are open for mediation, the ball is in Dr.Gonzo's court. I also think we should take this slow. I'll try and add some more notes to the talk page and ask for your comments when I'm finished. You can take a look at some of my notes on Wikipedia talk:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2006-05-02 Chuck Berry. —Viriditas | Talk 07:17, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:F-knoll01.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:F-knoll01.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 04:08, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Note, I have also listed this image as having no source information. Please add such information else it could be deleted after 7 days. Thanks, Localzuk^(talk) 19:07, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Kilborn1996.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Kilborn1996.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Localzuk^(talk) 18:48, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I don't quite understand your confrontational tone. (I don't play warcraft for one...) Second, I believe that the image doesn't add anything to the articles in question as you can't really show an example of 'pausing the show' in a single snapshot. I think that it can be replaced for the article about Kilborn with an image of him that has a free license.

Finally, I would remind you to remain civil and refrain from personal attacks when talking to people.

(PS. bear in mind I have tagged about 200 images in the last 36 hours, so even though I may have them right for 99% of them I may be wrong on one or two).-Localzuk^(talk) 19:03, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your age[edit]

Mark Farinas upgraded to Mark 2000 on the eve of the second Chistian millenia

That would be 31^st December, 1000, making you over a thousand years old! Wow! That's impressive. Perhaps you even merit your own article, given your unusually long lifespan.

--Awesome 11:07, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Kentish Plover[edit]

The addition gave no sources or references, but more to the point, it is incredibly parochial. This species breeds across the northern hemisphere, and, like other beach-nesting waders, is adversely affected by human activity everywhere, despite legal protection. It is difficult to see why the beaches in one town in one country are special, and I don't think we want this to turn into a list of hundreds of beaches all over the world where this bird is threatened.

I've left it for now, to give you a chance to respond, but imho, unless there really is a reason why SF is different, it would be better to make this into a general comment on the threats to a beach nesting bird. jimfbleak 06:35, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Kita001.gif[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Kita001.gif. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 10:52, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Pubpaint01.jpg[edit]

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Pubpaint01.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:12, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:PCPAINTBRUSHDESIGNER.JPG[edit]

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:PCPAINTBRUSHDESIGNER.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:18, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

1000 Years?![edit]

Holy!!! How'd you do it?!Connell66 08:47, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:PCPAINTBRUSHDESIGNER.JPG[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:PCPAINTBRUSHDESIGNER.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 00:45, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Pubpaint01.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Pubpaint01.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:20, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license[edit]

Unspecified source/license for Image:KaneKramer.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:KaneKramer.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 21:45, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I thought that said milfbot. That would be very cool. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.166.197.2 (talk) 00:28, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:KaneKramer.jpg[edit]

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:KaneKramer.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NW (Talk) 00:18, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs[edit]

Hello Mark 2000! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 938 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Kane Kramer - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 20:49, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:IXI.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:IXI.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:52, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

SPEEDY DELETION![edit]

when? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.166.197.2 (talk) 00:31, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]