User talk:Majoka4321

Important information[edit]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Just so you know, the topic of castes has been a perennial source of conflict, and any sort of content added or changed must be directly attributed to reliable published sources. If you have any questions about the community rules surrounding castes, please ask at WikiProject India. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 23:57, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Orh, you may be blocked from editing. Do not revert to the old unreliably sourced version of the article which was rewritten as per policy few months back. If you want to append something, discuss in the talk page. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 15:01, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I can change it continously, if you blocked my account i make change with different account. because this is not our history. If you want to know history, then go to village of Orh/oad community. No one from oad community know who are chasas, we are not subcaste of them. Even we don't know them. You said untouchable, even, not in single state we are treated as untouchable. We comes under kshatriya varn, we establish the Odisha state, Odra kingdom of odisha belongs go us, you can read in Mahabarat, vishnu puran etc. Please, Don't put anything on the behalf of Britisher History. They comes in 1608, how they know about us. If a brahman do any occupied they remain Brahman. So how we become untouchable when we are kshatriya in history. Even we celebrate Kshatriya Samrat Sagara Jayanti Every year. We are Orh/oad Rajput. Don't put anything on our caste page when you don't know practical situation. So, if you don't change this content. I repeatedly change it. Majoka4321 (talk) 15:13, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article version you are reverting too was poorly sourced and mostly unsourced. It was up for a rewrite and it was done using reliable sources. WE only use WP:RS and WP:HISTRS complaint sources when writing content about caste articles. We write content based on sources. If you make another account to do such things, WP:SOCK investigation will be done against you and all of the users will be blocked. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 15:20, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Majoka4321, please read Wikipedia:Ownership of content. Wikipedia is a collaborative project; no single editor has any right of ownership or editorial control over an article's contents. You cannot insist that an article remain at a version you prefer, or tell others that they cannot make changes. Editors are expected to assume good faith towards others; do not accuse others of harmful motives without clear evidence.

Consensus is Wikipedia's fundamental editorial model; disagreements over content must be discussed calmly on the article talk page to attempt to find compromise. If that does not resolve the disagreement, further dispute resolution measures can be utilized. Adherence to these principles is necessary for the smooth and collegial functioning of the encyclopedia. Violating them will be considered disruptive editing and invite sanctions, so please carefully consider your next response. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 15:26, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dear, it is my humble request to you. Why you make our history very bad. Britisher have a very wrong perspective, they don't know anything. I already read books my them on our Caste. They written wrong. Thats not true. We even don't know about those facts. Like you write orh is subcaste of chasas. Dwar6we even don't know who is chasas. So how would we subcaste of them. Even our forefather never tell us about those facts. And even the books written by Brahman, Jaga community peoplenon our caste. They never wrote this. Please please don't make these kind of changes. It will make bad impact on our image, our newer generation. Please Majoka4321 (talk) 15:27, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you cannot, put right things. Please delete this page. Even by this efforts, our newer generation will not affect. Majoka4321 (talk) 15:29, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Majoka4321 We are aware that systemic bias exists, and your concerns might be completely legitimate. However, the way in which you are trying to correct that bias is confrontational. I know that is difficult if you are emotionally invested in a topic, but if you can make an effort to work with other editors through civil discussion and compromise, then I am sure other editors will make the same effort in return. I am certain that the outcome will be much more satisfactory. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 15:52, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dear, i hope the future outcome may be satisfactory. But please remove the batch of untouchable as soon as possible. Otherwise, please delete this page. We are not untouchable. Untouchable caste are chamar, Dahnuk, mehar, valmiki, somehow dhobi, Kanjar, Nut etc. Orh is not untouchable caste. Majoka4321 (talk) 15:59, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Drm310: The sources used now in the article are not from British era, actually British era sources have been deprecated as per multiple consensuses at WP:INB and other venues. The sources used in the article as of now are from modern Indian scholars and they conform WP:HISTRS policy. The older version to which this user is reverting to, as well as many of their probable socks and IPs, was poorly sourced with large chunks unsourced sections. That even had a YouTube video for reference! - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 16:02, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ohk, now i will give you resource that they are kshatriya caste. Please go to google book kshatriya(kshatriy) prampara, and search for ओड्र. ओड्र is sanskrit word which deform in thousad years and use as ओड in hindi. Like जट as जाट, ब्राह्मण as बामण. So please add that resource also and remove untouchanle banner. Majoka4321 (talk) 16:14, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey my dear editor friend you can also search for google book jatibhaskara and search for ओड. It also shows that we are kshatriya caste, and the odra kingdom belongs to us. Majoka4321 (talk) 16:23, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Link the URLs of the source. we have to see whether that is reliable. Second, discuss in the article talk page. Also the terms → artisans, farmers, untouchable, chasa have sources accompanying. Many castes are considered general in some region, OBC in some and SC in others. Jats for example are considered general in Punjab (Jat Siks), but are both OBCs and general in other parts of the country. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 16:27, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, jats are obc, genral both. But as they are not untouchable. We also are not untouchable. We are backward in some state. But not untouchable. Majoka4321 (talk) 16:48, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It is sourced, but please continue the discussion in Talk:Orh. It would be better. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 16:55, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Orh. Dirkbb (talk) 23:11, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I already give many source. And proofs. So why would you don't change the content. As he wrote untouchable caste. Orh is not untouchable caste. If you have a problem with this. I have a simple solution for this. Please delete the page of my caste. We don't want wrong information, so please delete this page. Majoka4321 (talk) 23:15, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Majoka4321 reported by User:Fylindfotberserk (Result: ). Thank you. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 15:24, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Majoka4321, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi Majoka4321! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cullen328 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

February 2021[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bishonen | tålk 13:18, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I see you announce that you intend to create sockpuppets if this account is blocked.[1] Yes, it's common that caste promoters do that, along with other disruption of the encyclopedia. But you do realise that socking is against our policies, I hope, so please don't. Bishonen | tålk 13:19, 3 February 2021 (UTC).[reply]

Brother, i give many reliable source. I can complaint to this page in FIR. How you can do this with other caste page. When i put content from reliable sources. If you can't maintain it in a right way. So please delete this page. Majoka4321 (talk) 19:40, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]