User talk:LordVoldemort728/Archive 17

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 10 Archive 15 Archive 16 Archive 17 Archive 18 Archive 19 Archive 20

The Signpost: 16 January 2023

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sultan: A Memoir (January 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curb Safe Charmer was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 17:10, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
Teahouse logo
Hello, LordVoldemort728! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 17:10, 16 January 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Education of Yuri has been accepted

The Education of Yuri, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

— Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 17:14, 16 January 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, LordVoldemort728. Thank you for your work on The Education of Yuri. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 03:34, 17 January 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Bhagwati Devi Sharma

Information icon Hello, LordVoldemort728. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Bhagwati Devi Sharma, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:01, 17 January 2023 (UTC)

Draft: Jeffrey Wegener

Will remove the youtube citations and try and find more reliable sources. so many old newspaper articles are not available online. one major source was or is is a book by Aust music writer Clinton Walker, and will try to insert citations. otherwise, the intra-wiki links surely play a big part... this person is actively referenced in so many of the other wiki entries it links to, does wiki not even trust itself? PingerSlinger97 (talk) 22:10, 17 January 2023 (UTC)

No. Wiki and YouTube are not reliable sources because any person can edit them and that person can also vandalise them and Wikipedia don't want that wikipedia will full of wrong and vandal information. ​​​​​​​𝐋𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐕𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐭𝟕𝟐𝟖🧙‍♂️Let's Talk ! 01:13, 18 January 2023 (UTC)