User talk:LoganTheGeshrat
Welcome[edit]
|
==Regarding edits to Abarat==
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, LoganTheGeshrat! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the link you added, matching rule proboards\d{1,3}\.com, is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia's external links policy for more information. If the link was to an image, please read Wikipedia's image tutorial on how to use a more appropriate method to insert the image into an article. If your link was intended to promote a site you own, are affiliated with, or will make money from inclusion in Wikipedia, please note that inserting spam into Wikipedia is against policy. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! Shadowbot 22:04, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
User box creator with template[edit]
I noticed you made a userbox here are two useful userbox creators you might be interested in
- Userbox Creator with template - designed to easily generate Userboxes and has builtin template.
- Userbox Creator with template has religious image database - designed to easily generate Religious Userboxes and has builtin template.
Java7837 20:18, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
Zatch Bell[edit]
Never really played the Zatch Bell card game so I don't really know. I usually hang out on a couple Gash/Zatch LJs and that's about it since its such a small community. As for a Wikia for Gash, depends on how much is out there and what we could do. -StrangerAtaru 22:37, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
Regarding Vino[edit]
- Can you explain this further? If you recall, there was a big controversy during the Ancient Mamodo arc because no one could tell if Zofis was supposed to be male or female (this finally had to be settled by Raiku himself). Japanese "pronoun" words are no help because they're generally neutral (boku and ore are mostly used by males, but watashi can be used by anyone; second-person words do not give any hint to gender at all). JuJube 02:28, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
Awright, I'll try to ask for more concrete evidence. But if you haven't changed it already, could you please keep it as female for now? Someone else will probably change it due time anyway, but just wait and I'll see what I can find....--LoganTheGeshrat 02:35, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
- Yeah, no problem. I only reverted on the other pages because of XxKibaxX's revert on the characters page. Consistency is the hobgoblin of minds like mine. ^_^ JuJube 02:40, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
Abarat - vandalism?[edit]
When you delete a paragraph and replace it with "stupid chese", it sorta looks like clowning around. If you disagree, we don't have much common ground on which to stage a discussion. Chris the speller (talk) 18:28, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
- I don't disagree with that because it wasn't me who made the edit. I'm not sure if you will be able to read this because it is on my talk page and not yours, but if don't reply within some space of time then I'll copy and paste this to your page. Anyway, if you were to look on Abarat's editing history you would find that the "stupid chese" edit was made by someone without an account, and, as I stated before on your tlak page, when trying to fix this something went wrong and I ended up making absolutely no change to the page at all, though this was recorded as an edit to the page, which would make it seem like I did make the vandalising edit. I don't wish to start a fight, it just seems that you misunderstood my edit to your talk page, which is fine, but what I'm really trying to say is I didn't make the "stupid chese" edit. Look for yourself. LoganTheGeshrat 18:37, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
- I believe that you were not trying to trash the article. A certain amount of friendly fire must be expected when we do a lot of work on Wikipedia, as can be seen on my talk page under "Samson". Blame the "fog of war" for that one. Body armor is recommended for editors using the semiautomatic anti-vandalism tools. Happy editing! Chris the speller (talk) 20:16, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
You were 'spoiled'?[edit]
I saw your edit summary comment...you basically forgo any rights to be spoiled by editing a video game article, especially one with as much information we have coming from Dojo. -Sukecchi (talk) 18:02, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
Well, this was WAY more info then was on the Dojo, and I beleive other SE sections of the page have been deleted. The recent edit summary on the Brawl page says this (apparently the guy tried to put it up again) LoganTheGeshrat 19:04, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
Tim and Eric Awesome Show, Great Job[edit]
Your edit was point on. Certain charactrers do recur on TEASGJ, but this in itself does not make them notable. This information does need to be expanded. For instance, John C. Reilly has played characters on the show other than just "Dr. Steve Brule", while Al Yankovic has played only "Uncle Muscles". An interesting point that might be expanded is that oddball characters James Quall, David Hart, Michael Schmidt, and Richard Dunn all use their own real names for whatever episode they were in. Further, characters who die in one episode often come back in another. This last device was also used in Tom Goes to the Mayor.
I would love to see this expanded a bit, as we all have favorite episodes from season one and two. Godhead01 (talk) 18:38, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 9[edit]
Hi. When you recently edited Gorillaz, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Converse (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:17, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:18, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]
Hello, LoganTheGeshrat. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]
Hello, LoganTheGeshrat. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]
Hello, LoganTheGeshrat. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]
| Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |