User talk:Llewee/Archives/2022

Your thread has been archived

Hi Llewee! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Destructive editing, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please . See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 1 January 2022 (UTC)

COVID-19 pandemic in the UK article

Hi! In this edit, you consolidated a number of citations into a block. However, in doing so, you broke the citation template formatting that provides detailed information in the generated cites, so I've reverted that change. If you want to group cites together, could you please keep the internal formatting of each citation intact? -- The Anome (talk) 13:29, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

I'm sorry, but you've done it again: see this diff. Can you see that you have replaced cites that use templates such as {{cite web}} and {{cite news}} with text and links? In doing so, information such as archive URLs has been lost, together with the structure inherent in these templates that is useful for anyone wanting to reformat citations or extract data from these tags. This represents a significant loss of information, so I've reverted your change again, but restored your most recent edit, which has no problems. Have you tried using the "Edit source" option? -- The Anome (talk) 14:42, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

The Anome I am aware that this format of grouping citations isn't ideal but as this overview is lumping together several events into single statements I think it is necessary to tidy up the references. As a tag indicating overuse of citations has been added it is likely that if these changes are not made then several citations will eventually be entirely cut away removing information from the article alltogether. As none of the links are dead or in particular danger I didn't think to much was lost by removing the archives but I could re-add them if you prefer.--Llewee (talk) 15:17, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Yes, but can you please preserve the archive links and the original use of citation templates? The links may not be dead currently, but the archive links exist as a method to prevent link rot. Note that the Internet Archive is not the only web archive out there, so having the URL is not redundant. -- The Anome (talk) 16:16, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

The Anome Ok, I'll revert your last edit and then re-add the archives.--Llewee (talk) 16:26, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:European Parliament constituencies in the United Kingdom (expanded example)

Hello, Llewee. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:European Parliament constituencies in the United Kingdom (expanded example), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:02, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 17

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Walter Padley, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ray Powell.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

My mistake on Labour Party Conference

Sorry about that content deletion, it was a mistake. I must have accidentally edited an old version and missed the warnings. Thanks for fixing that. Rwendland (talk) 12:35, 23 January 2022 (UTC)

Rwendland OK, no matter--Llewee (talk) 12:38, 23 January 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:European Parliament constituencies in the United Kingdom (expanded example)

Hello, Llewee. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "European Parliament constituencies in the United Kingdom".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:20, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

Category:Opinion polling for United kingdom votes in the 2020s has been nominated for renaming

Category:Opinion polling for United kingdom votes in the 2020s has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Jmorrison230582 (talk) 14:25, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

ITN recognition for Shirley Hughes

On 2 March 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Shirley Hughes, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Ks0stm ^{(T•C•G•E)}  If you reply here, please ping me by using {{re|Ks0stm}} in your reply.  17:37, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Life After Life (TV series)

Hello! Your submission of Life After Life (TV series) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 22:39, 25 April 2022 (UTC)==DYK for Life After Life (TV series)==

On 26 May 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Life After Life (TV series), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the TV adaptation of Life After Life was described as "bingeworthy", but also "practically plotless"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Life After Life (TV series). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Life After Life (TV series)), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Murder of Arthur Labinjo-Hughes

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Murder of Arthur Labinjo-Hughes you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Etriusus -- Etriusus (talk) 20:41, 9 June 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Murder of Arthur Labinjo-Hughes

The article Murder of Arthur Labinjo-Hughes you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Murder of Arthur Labinjo-Hughes for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Etriusus -- Etriusus (talk) 21:02, 9 June 2022 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Llewee! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Not sure about the quality of a citation, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please . See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 12 June 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Murder of Arthur Labinjo-Hughes

The article Murder of Arthur Labinjo-Hughes you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Murder of Arthur Labinjo-Hughes for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Etriusus -- Etriusus (talk) 18:41, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Llewee

Thank you for creating Homes for Ukraine.

User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 17:17, 24 June 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 5

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Murder of Logan Mwangi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page C..

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 5 July 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Murder of Logan Mwangi

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Murder of Logan Mwangi you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Steelkamp -- Steelkamp (talk) 09:03, 19 July 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Murder of Logan Mwangi

The article Murder of Logan Mwangi you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Murder of Logan Mwangi for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Steelkamp -- Steelkamp (talk) 11:42, 19 July 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Murder of Logan Mwangi

The article Murder of Logan Mwangi you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Murder of Logan Mwangi for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Steelkamp -- Steelkamp (talk) 04:42, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Curriculum for Wales (2022–present)

On 29 September 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Curriculum for Wales (2022–present), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the new curriculum in Wales allows schools to set their own curricula? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Curriculum for Wales (2022 to present). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Curriculum for Wales (2022–present)), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

~ ONUnicorn^{(Talk|Contribs)}problem solving 04:38, 29 September 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Make Me Prime Minister

On 18 October 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Make Me Prime Minister, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that one reviewer of the British reality TV series Make Me Prime Minister said "Technically it's worth five stars. In every other way, I wish I was dead"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Make Me Prime Minister. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Make Me Prime Minister), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:03, 18 October 2022 (UTC)

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 8,431 views (702.6 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of October 2022 – nice work!

theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/her) 01:58, 19 October 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 27

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Make Me Prime Minister, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rehabilitation.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 27 October 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Sophia Kennedy for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sophia Kennedy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sophia Kennedy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Styx & Stones (talk) 11:08, 15 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)