User talk:LeoFrank/Archive 18

Archive 15

Archive 16

Archive 17

Archive 18

Archive 19

Archive 20

→

Archive 22

Neerali

Hello LeoFrank,

thank you for your kind response in talk neerali

references

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6CL8RdmcYwQ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3L7ZqbkfX4E

And many news article available on request — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sameershan (talk • contribs) 13:15, 10 July 2018 (UTC)

@Sameershan: YouToube is not a reliable source. If there are news articles, please cite them and open the request again. — LeoFrank  ^Talk 15:05, 10 July 2018 (UTC)

I did. waiting for reply ? thank you Sameershan (talk) 19:35, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

@Sameershan: Looks like it is done already. Please check. — LeoFrank  ^Talk 16:01, 13 July 2018 (UTC)

yes. thank you Sameershan (talk) 02:08, 14 July 2018 (UTC)

Information

Hi, there are direct flights from Srinagar with one stop at Sharjah (SXR-SHJ-MED) , flight number- AI5103 , AI5105, AI5107. 649pardeep (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 06:24, 14 July 2018 (UTC)

@649pardeep: I do not see this anywhere in the schedules. And Hajj AFAIK is only to Medina, Sharjah is not a Hajj destination. — LeoFrank  ^Talk 08:59, 14 July 2018 (UTC)

Air Deccan destinations to Agartala

You have asked me the source from where I have learned that Air Deccan fly to Agartala. You will find it in the official website of Air Deccan. You can check it now there you will find that Air Deccan serves Agartala. I don't know what is your problem with me all the time your are reverting my edits with out knowing that whether I am right or Wrong. This is very disgusting. I am not at all illiterate that I will do all sorts of nonsense. You can find that in the Official website of Air Deccan. So, please check it as soon as possible. Chandrakant Sarkar (talk) 15:19, 14 July 2018 (UTC)

@Chandrakant Sarkar: If something is disgusting, it's how you and your meat puppets do not understand the policy on WP:BURDEN. In simple words, if you add it, then prove it, don't ask editors to go and check xyz website. Simple. It just simply shows how you and your friends fail to understand basic policies and how things work here in Wikipedia. — LeoFrank  ^Talk 17:01, 14 July 2018 (UTC)

How can I prove the fact? If you don't want to check the fact in the official website of Air Deccan. If you go to that website you will find that it is clearly written that Air Deccan serves Agartala. And if you are not interested to that I can't help it out.Chandrakant Sarkar (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 03:14, 15 July 2018 (UTC)

@Chandrakant Sarkar: WP:BURDEN has been cited numerous times and yet you are least bothered to go through this policy. No one can help you if you are adamant in not understanding how thing work here. — LeoFrank  ^Talk 03:17, 15 July 2018 (UTC)

Can I just list out the tourist attractions in and around Belagavi district?

Hi, You recently removed the list of tourist attractions from Belgaum district wikipedia page saying the page is not a travel guide. But I had seen the list of tourist attractions in many Wikipedia pages of places. So, can I just list out those without explaining the tourist attractions? Rishi Muni (talk) 07:46, 15 July 2018 (UTC)

@Rishi Muni: PRose is preferred over a list. The list would violate WP:NOTDIR. Even in the prose form, not every place needs to be mentioned, but rather only a few, that too those which have a wikipedia article of their own. — LeoFrank  ^Talk 17:11, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

/* United Kingdom */

Is there a problem including a work of literature which refers to the UK withdrawing from the EU? I included the book's details including ISBN

This request was just for the sake of completeness

Regards

--GovernmentBoffin (talk) 09:48, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

Vizhinjam International Seaport

Abandoned; article is largely unreferenced and the text resembles advertising copy, and is not suitable for a full c/e. Also; GOCE is not cleanup. Baffle gab1978 22:48, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

Hi LeoFrank, your request for the GOCE to copy-edit the above article has been declined. Please feel free to re-submit your request once the problems have been dealt with. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 21:07, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

Improper article reversion

That was a very immature edit reversion I have ever seen. You are welcome to edit/revert the unsourced 'statements' any user adds. But makes sure you revert the statements or changes which are unsourced, that is precisely not what you have done. Well, this is a kind of vandalism, although you seem to fight against it. Did you at least read the cited reference article from 'The Hindu' or go through the DGCA data for the fiscal year 2017-18?. It is highly unlikely that all the statements I have added are wrong. Some are self-explanatory with links to other Wikipedia articles. If you feel like it is violating Wikipedia's policy, remove that 'statement' which does so by quoting the precise reason rather than vague statements like 'reverted to last good version'. The meaning of 'good' is not defined.

Not all statements in Wikipedia will not have a published source which exactly states the result as in the statement. For example, in your 'good' version there is a statement like: " It is the third-busiest airport in Kerala after Kochi and Thiruvananthapuram", which doesn't have any source currently cited to it. But, you still keep it. So, "No original research" applies here as well. Hence your activity itself is an oxymoron.

The paragraph on different flight destinations from Calicut is self-explanatory, which is supported by the latter part of this page and links, and the next paragraph on places of Interest is also linked with proper pages.

I have put a little bit of effort to come up with a better description of the airport introduction part, which was not up to the level of other airport Wikipedia pages. But, it seems like you prefer describing the data of 2011-12 when the airport was listed as the 12th busiest airport in India. Well, FYI, this is 2018, things need to improve accordingly, the reader needs to know the latest information, not what it was a couple of years ago! Just a thought. — Preceding unsigned comment added by IFlyCCJ (talk • contribs) 10:21, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

@IFlyCCJ: Based on your message, it is very clear that you do not understand the No Original Research policy. Content you add needs sources and neither can you synthesize content from multiple sources which you have done in your edit. Also, go through WP:OSE. Just becuse there may have been one or two statements that did not have a source, it does not justify you adding unsourced content. You are free to remove unsourced content from the article. — LeoFrank  ^Talk 10:51, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

How to use information provided in Photo

I see the recent content was deleted by you. In this regard kindly let me know what is the right method to provide reference when some information is available in a photograph of Baord, Banner etc. --BhailalK (talk) 15:55, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

Lent Bumps 2018 rejection

I don't quite understand why they pages for Lent Bumps 2017 or Lent Bumps 2016 exist when I provided sources of the same, if not better, quality for the article.

Should these pages be removed then? (My only reason for making the 2018 page was to help to complete the set)

Raptokvortex (talk) 12:37, 11 August 2018 (UTC)

Nepal Airlines to Bangalore

There is no sort of evidence that the bangalore airport is serving kathmandu; and the airlink is being operated by nepal airlines. It seems like an promotional ancedote! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Samueljjohn (talk • contribs) 12:53, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

@Samueljjohn: Your repeated reversions just shows how ignorant you are! Nepal continues to serve BLR. See this. Promotional anecdote huh? I can't help if you cannot notice what is being displayed in the link! — LeoFrank  ^Talk 08:50, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

Nepal Airlines to Bangalore

There is no sort of evidence that the bangalore airport is serving kathmandu; and the airlink is being operated by nepal airlines. It seems like an promotional ancedote! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Samueljjohn (talk • contribs) 12:53, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

@Samueljjohn: Your repeated reversions just shows how ignorant you are! Nepal continues to serve BLR. See this. Promotional anecdote huh? I can't help if you cannot notice what is being displayed in the link! — LeoFrank  ^Talk 08:50, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

Tirupati Airport Improper revision

Hello I could notice that you are continously indulging in edit war despite the content was sourced with official records. As I already invited you to the talk page to discuss before reverting you kept ignoring the same. I have already put forward the relevant sources from official website. This is the last request to you to not indulge in reverting sourced content with official reference. You are not supposed to revert based on your personal understanding or personal consent.I could see many of your edits on various airport articles. Now it raises a question of data integrity and availability with all your reverts By LovSLif (talk) 07:27, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

@LovSLif: It's common sense. Just be a grant of international status, does not imply that the airport has indeed become international by a mere announcement. It just means that there is work that needs to be done to upgrade the airport to reach the status! Such a teeny weeny airport with no international connectivity at all is already international? Even if international flights begin, it will first be deemed a customs airport. You need to have an understanding first before ranting around that your airport is already international. — LeoFrank  ^Talk 08:53, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

Destinations on an airport page

Hi Leo. Are destinations that are not directly connected to an airport supposed to be listed in the "Airlines and Destinations" section of the airport page? I am asking since I've seen multiple destinations on "Chandigarh Airport" page that are not actually directly connected to Chandigarh by an airline, rather they can be flown to with a stop in some other airport such as Delhi. Kanwarpreetsingh25 (talk) 07:12, 17 August 2018 (UTC)kanwarpreetsingh25

@Kanwarpreetsingh25: A direct destination can either be non-stop or with one or more stops. In the case of the latter where a direct destination has one or more stops, passengers do not disembark from the aircraft and just continue to their destination on the same flight. So in any of the above cases, these destinations can be listed. But in cases where, passengers disembark from an aircraft and then board another one (mostly at a hub), the destinations cannot be listed as they end up being deemed connections even if the entire journey carries the same flight number. — LeoFrank  ^Talk 16:43, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

In that case, what can be done for the case of "Chandigarh Airport"? There is this user(649pardeep) who repeatedly edits and removes the changes I've made to the destinations section on the airport page to remove destinations which aren't direct. He however argues that since it is the same flight number it should be listed here, even though passengers can disembark and embark at the layover airport. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kanwarpreetsingh25 (talk • contribs) 07:50, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

@Kanwarpreetsingh25: Actually I agree with 649pardeep with the changes they have made wrt one-hop flights. All the flights added are operated using the same aircraft, carry the same flight number and just continue onto the next sector, so these are valid destinations out of IXC. — LeoFrank  ^Talk 13:59, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

Why my edit was reverted?

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Hi, Recently you have reverted one of my edit where I have added an image to an article. Here is the edit. Why do you think this is irrelevant? The object show present at the airport and it can be there in the article I believe. I'll be happy if you explain me why. That was image there since some time some ip has reverted my image, I have reverted that change now You have reverted mine :) . --Jnanaranjan Sahu (ଜ୍ଞାନ) ^talk 09:50, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

@Jnanaranjan Sahu: To highlight each and every object in an airport is not notable. So, the presence or no presence of the Indian flag is not relalavnt in anyway. — LeoFrank  ^Talk 09:55, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

So why don't you remove other images? like (Plaza Premium Lounge, domestic side), the British airway flight? Why this image. it's not like you keep what you like to keep and you remove what you think shouldn't be there. Please undo that change. I am not a big photographer neither I contribute to Wikipedia or commons for any sort promotion. --Jnanaranjan Sahu (ଜ୍ଞାନ) ^talk 10:13, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

@Jnanaranjan sahu: You firstly need to understand WP:OSE. Coming to the images you have pointed out, they represent the airport's functions. A flag of the country does not define what an airport is and what's its functionalities are. Posting pictures of flags may be more relevant in articles related to the government or defense. — LeoFrank  ^Talk 14:04, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

Hey! I think you should read that well before suggesting someone else. The image shows the national flag is hoisted outside the airport. This can be a feature, a particular object of the airport as well as showing an area of the airport. I'll not force you to undo the edit and I'm not going to add that image again, but what I want to say that please don't spend(not waste) your time with this kind of stuff rather than actually fighting with vandalism and please don't be judgmental about an image and revert someone's edit like this. You are a senior editor, an understanding gesture is expected from you rather than sticking to what you have done is right. Anyway thank you for your contribution to Wikipedia. --Jnanaranjan Sahu (ଜ୍ଞାନ) ^talk 13:45, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

It's of no use discussing with you. I cannot help if you cannot understand that a flag picture is irrelevant to an airport. Instead of trying to understand, you just accuse. In fact what I rather see, is your interest in adding the image only cause you have taken it. In any case, we are done talking here. — LeoFrank  ^Talk 11:18, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

---

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Change of name -- CIPET , khunti wiki page

Leo Frank

Someone by mistake created page of CIPET institute of Ranchi in the name of khunti. You can check on official website of Indian government ( link is on page ) that this institute has named for Ranchi city. Only its permanent campus is under construction at khunti locality. I can't change the heading of page. I request you to do that please.[1] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tantrik7 (talk • contribs) 15:16, 11 September 2018 (UTC)

@Tantrik7: You can create a requested move thread on the talk page of the article. — LeoFrank  ^Talk 12:53, 11 September 2018 (UTC)

Amritsar airport

Hi Leo, Why are you removing Indigo Dubai-Amritsar and Spicejet Amritsar-Bangkok and Goa Flight.All these flights are newly launched and available on official respective airline websites for booking and even included in shedule.Many press reports have also reported these 3 flights.I request you kindly revert back with research and add these flights with proper sourcing in the Airport pages of ATQ,DXB,GOI and BKK — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2405:205:4180:B9E0:AE63:D0D7:A198:E8D8 (talk) 06:26, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

@2405:205:4180:B9E0:AE63:D0D7:A198:E8D8: None of the additions were sourced. Also, it is the responsibility of the editor adding content to cite sources. — LeoFrank  ^Talk 08:44, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

Direct flights

Hi Unfortuanately I suspect you have got the wrong end on the stick here - In your edit summary to me you say "If passengers disembark, then it does not qualify to be listed per WP:AIRPORT-CONTENT." is completely the opposite to what is actually written - to quote ".....If passengers cannot disembark at a stop on a direct flight, then do not list it as a destination or as 'via'. Direct flights are not always non-stop flights.....". This is saying if the stop on a two or three hop flight is purely a technical stop don't list that stop as a destination not what you are taking it as. Andrewgprout (talk) 07:06, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

Biju Patnaik International Airport

@Leofrank User:LeoFrank

The flights are available . Just visit the websites of respective airlines (Air India and Indigo) and check wheather they are offering the flights to Kochi and Guwahati or not. . without valid sitation and reason you are removing edits . why ?? I am not trying to be smart but your are .. Both Guwahati and KOchi flights are available from respective date. YOU HAVE REMOVED THE earlier edits by other users too siting false edits . how come they are false edits. You may have entire day to edit these pages we took out time to edit as it is not our day job, all I wanted to do is to update the infomration available so that out city airport remain updated. Without verifying any thing you just remove the information . why and you are calling me over smart does not that violates any wiki rules (personal attack) wish I could report such things ??? ~~Casudipta~~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Casudipta (talk • contribs) 09:04, 4 October 2018 (UTC)

@Casudipta: Instead of wasting your time writing all this nonsense, spend time in reading WP:BURDEN. The guideline is very simple. If you cannot prove what your are adding, it will be challenged and removed by other editors. You cannot tell editors to go and check and verify, It is your responsibility to prove what you have added. — LeoFrank  ^Talk 09:40, 4 October 2018 (UTC)

Regarding Lokpriya Gopinath Bordoloi International Airport

Dear LeoFrank,

I have added a reference from a news article in my last edit for the article "Lokpriya Gopinath Bordoloi International Airport". Why did you undo the edit without even having a look at the reference? This is very unfortunate! Have a look at the "Airlines and Destinations" table. It looks a mess after your "undo".

Debanjan ray (talk) 06:58, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

You reverted my Gujarat edits

Hi LeoFrank,

My edit to the page Gujarat was reverted by you with https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Gujarat&oldid=857708292.

The religion section includes images of Jama masjid, Jewish Synagogue, Gurudwara but not Somnath temple, Dakor , Dwarika, Ambaji temple, which has number of followers in Gujarat higher and older history. As Somnath and Ambaji has followers across the indian hindu population and these places being one of the most preferred religious places across India, should be included in the list. I find no reason to exclude Somnath mandir from "religious section of Gujarat".

May I know on what basis these religious places have been selected and why you reverted those changes?

Regards, Hrishikesh Thula — Preceding unsigned comment added by HRISHIKESH THULA (talk • contribs) 17:10, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

issue about Page Revert of Kolhapur Airport

The Official Name Of Kolhapur Airport is "Chhatrapati Rajaram Maharaj Airport" The Peoples Can understand It by their Official Name also. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rsd95 (talk • contribs) 17:27, 26 September 2018 (UTC)

Vijayawada Airport revert

Dear LeoFrank,

I appreciate your promptness at ensuring the Vijayawada Airport page is free from misinformation and at preventing vandalism to the same. I am leaving this message to ask why my changes were reverted. IMHO I added pertinent information with relevant and standard citations to the DigiYatra news. Please tell me the reason.

--Pmwiki15 (talk) 01:55, 12 October 2018 (UTC)

@Pmwiki15: I missed adding one more reason in the edit summary, WP:NOTNEWS. From what I see, there is very little information on the same to add it to the article. Once there is enough information, we can go ahead and add the same. Please note, there are too many IPs and new users adding a hell lot of unwanted or unsourced content, in this light, I would've missed adding the complete reason for revert. — LeoFrank  ^Talk 02:13, 12 October 2018 (UTC)

-- I respectfully disagree. the news first came in Mar18 and there have been subsequent updates on it. At the very least, the sources I provided are credible. I even added the source of the program that stems from GoI. If you have a problem with my description of the DigiYatra program, then so be it. I can modify it or even get rid of it altogether. But I don't think you have enough of a case denying the fact that the airport was chosen for the program. That fact was elucidated time and again by many credible news outlets and no news has ever came out redacting Vijayawada Airport from that list. And as such, I believe that the Wiki page must reflect that as it is general, factual and public domain information

--Pmwiki15 (talk) 21:01, 12 October 2018 (UTC)

Reverting changes to King Fahd International Airport

I made several changes to the passenger routes served in King Fahd International Airport after an extensive search using the leading schedules provider OAG. The least I hoped you would do is to check on any travel website if the changes I made were valid or not. Unfortunately, you just reverted all the changes without checking their validity. If the matter was having a source, you should have contacted me to add the source instead of reverting all the edits I made. Anyways, there was so many outdated information there, and to mention the source of each would be an extensive work that is unnecessary as all changes come from one source. I reintroduced the changes again, and mentioned the source in my comment on the changes. If you have any further issues with that, please contact me. Imdashti (talk) 05:53, 19 October 2018 (UTC)

@Imdashti: I made several changes to the passenger routes served in King Fahd International Airport. All without providing sources. you just reverted all the changes without checking their validity: It's the responsibility of the editor adding content to prove what they have added. I reintroduced the changes again, and mentioned the source in my comment on the changes: Not acceptable, inline citations are required. — LeoFrank  ^Talk 13:32, 19 October 2018 (UTC)

Arjun Kapoor filmography

Hi Leo, re: this edit, I'm not quite sure I understand where you're coming from. A film is considered a primary source, and can be used for uncontroversial information like cast and plot. I don't see why we'd need secondary sources unless you had a bona fide concern that the filmography was bogus. Do you have such a concern? Regards, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:23, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

@Cyphoidbomb: Alright. I was anyways trying to keep the article clean by removing unsourced content which I usually do for articles across Wikipedia (since that's the main crunch of the problem here). Was unaware of WP:FIMOGRAPHY as such. Feel free to revert my edit. But I guess since this is allowed, the article on the film should be well sourced if I am not wrong? And even the list in an actor's article should contain films that have articles right? I'll keep this in mind now while editing any article on actors. — LeoFrank  ^Talk 04:00, 23 October 2018 (UTC)

For something like a filmography, I tend to operate on the "is it feasible?" system. If I'm looking at a filmography for an established actor, I'm probably not likely to doubt many additions to the list, unless there's something else that piques my suspicion, like a history of fake films being added to the filmography. Even if a film doesn't yet have an article, I'm probably not likely to delete it outright, depending on the context. (I'll spare you the examples unless you want some.) But if someone adds an upcoming 2019 film to a filmography and there's neither any references nor an article, I'm more likely to delete that, especially if it's alleged to be in pre-production, because we don't normally add pre-production films to filmographies. Typically for lists like "Notable people in X city" we want there to be articles for the individuals first, because we want to establish that the people are notable before we go adding them to these lists. But for films in an actor's filmography, I don't see the need to be draconian about removal. An actor might have had some bit parts here and there, or may have worked in web series before becoming notable, so there is some academic value there. Anyway, I might be rambling. If I can clarify anything, please let me know. Thanks, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 00:18, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

Lufthansa's Pune operations

Hello there, please note that your recent change is a violation of the aviation portal guidelines regarding operating carriers. Since a few months ago, we no longer state operating carriers in the destination tables but only the brand that "operates" the flights. So it is a Lufthansa flight and noted as such, no matter which airline operates it on their behalf. This is done for all airlines. Best regards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.174.28.198 (talk) 13:09, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

BIAL T2 Revert

Hi, I have added details about BIAL T2 with reliable citation. But you reverted the changes. I would be like to know what's wrong with my edit. As a beginner, if there's anything wrong, it will help me to improve as a responsible editor. Arajc (talk) 10:47, 26 October 2018 (UTC)

@Arajc: Please go through WP:COPYVIO and WP:PARAPHRASE which I have also mentioned in the edit summary. As such there are more details about T2 in this section. — LeoFrank  ^Talk 11:57, 26 October 2018 (UTC)

Help needed

Hi , Someone non registered user/editors doing removing destinations after sometime from Chandigarh Airport (IXC) , these destinations are one stop with same aircraft and number , now I'm unable to undo , please do something to solve this problem permanently. I'll be grateful to hear from you. 649pardeep (talk)

@649pardeep: I have reverted the edits. You may start using twinkle which I have used to revert to a specific edit. I request you here to add references for all the airlines which will help us in maintaining the right content in the destination table. — LeoFrank  ^Talk 13:06, 26 October 2018 (UTC)

Vijaywada Airport

Indigo released Singapore schedule, log in to website. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 223.238.116.157 (talk • contribs) 19:39, 26 October 2018 (UTC)

Unless there is a reliable source for the same, we can wait, no hurry. As such, read WP:BURDEN. — LeoFrank  ^Talk 14:15, 26 October 2018 (UTC)

Urgent

Hi There's disruptive editing on Ranchi Airport by unknown editor , please take some action to stop false editing. 649pardeep (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 08:55, 4 November 2018 (UTC)

Help needed

Hi There is disruptive editing on Chandigarh Airport(IXC) , unregistered editor removing one stop destinations and references again and again citing them as false . Please protect the page or either take strict on them please. 07 November 2018, 13:50 649pardeep (talk) 08:22, 7 November 2018 (UTC)

@649pardeep: This time, the IP is correct. Per GoAir's schedule page, only AMD, BOM and SXR are are listed as destinations out of IXC.

In future, if there is an obvious WP:disruptive editing, you may request for protection here. — LeoFrank  ^Talk 10:16, 7 November 2018 (UTC)

Thank you. Hi. Today I added 3rd Column for Refs on (New Delhi Airport (DEL) but (FlyJet777) editor removed that column stated that there is no need for that. I believe Refs column is best and hazle free and it should be on destinations list . If possible then please add that please. Thank you 649pardeep (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 15:26, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

@649pardeep: I have reverted them. Their reasons to remove the added column has no logic. You can continue to add references where they are missing and also move the references to the 3rd column where it is yet to be done. Thank you for making this move in adding the third column esp given it being quite a tedious task in cases where the table is too long. — LeoFrank  ^Talk 02:26, 9 November 2018 (UTC)

Hi. Previously I had moved references of (DEL Airport) Airlines and Destinations to Refs column as per your direction but editor Andrewgprout reverted back stating that "reverted to situation before bold format change - currently being discussed" 649pardeep (talk) 07:48, 9 November 2018 (UTC)

@649pardeep: Andrewgprout is disrupting here trying to make a point. I have reverted their edit as their argument make no sense. Please take time and add more valid references to Indira Gandhi International Airport. Thanks, — LeoFrank  ^Talk 15:05, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

Clarification on my aviation travel news on GX Airlines, Hainan Airlines and IndiGo

Hello, LeoFrank,

My news about GX Airlines' inaugural flight to Singapore on 12 December 2018 as mentioned on my aviation travel web-site is based on my searches in the web-sites of GX Airlines, short for Guangxi Beibu Gulf Airlines and on the on-line ticketing platform Trip.com. My web-site is powered by Blogger but I do not consider it as my blog. The news is open for public reference. I am not telling any personal lie. Therefore, I believe that my aviation news about GX Airlines' actual inaugural flight to Singapore on 12 December 2018 should replace the earlier news of Routesonline (an external website). Routesonline has not corrected the inaugural flight date from 29 March 2019 to 12 December 2018.

I also confirm that the resumption date of Hainan Airlines' flight to Singapore on 30 November 2018 is true. Your original source Routesonline states tickets are not available for sale but these tickets are available now, as mentioned in my aviation news on Hainan Airlines' resumption flight to Singapore.

My news on IndiGo's inaugural flight from Singapore to Vijayawada is based on checks in the ticketing system of IndiGo. Please read the details before concluding the news is not reliable.

Asianperu (talk) 12:41, 11 November 2018 (UTC)

@Asianperu: Please read our policy on self published sources and in general on what constitutes a verifiable source. — LeoFrank  ^Talk 15:07, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, LeoFrank. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)