User talk:Lenkhmer

This is Lenkhmer's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Welcome![edit]

Hi Lenkhmer! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! DoubleGrazing (talk) 19:44, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (February 11)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Lenkhmer/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 19:31, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have research and spent many time for Pich Sambath that is is a good fighter as you see here

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kun_Khmer#/media/File:Kneestrike_kun_khmer.jpg. what I do is independent and most reliable not value myself. I hope you understand and help me. Lenkhmer (talk) 15:23, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Lenkhmer! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 19:31, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (February 12)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Lenkhmer/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Qcne (talk) 15:00, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pich Sambath (February 12)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pich Sambath and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 17:15, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have learned from that experience and from the instructions already, but why do you say all references is not qualified enough? All information I use is from official TV broadcast real, independent. It is nonsense that I should fake for publishing the celebrity. Wikipedia is popular search web. I tell truth if I have other choice I will not use Wikipedia. I am volunteer and spend so much time for research without fake. I saw some articles is a little description with little references but it can be published.In related articles, I don’t understand how your work is I think you are unfair. Lenkhmer (talk) 06:08, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 13[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pich Sambath, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Koh Kong. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 18:04, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 20[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pich Sophann, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Takeo.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:01, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 11[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pich Sambath, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kampong Thom.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 23[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chhoeung Lvai, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Bati, Kampong Chhnang and Takeo.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:04, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]