User talk:LaurenCox600

This is LaurenCox600's talk page, where you can send her messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Can some Checkuser help me

This request for help from administrators has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please reapply the {{admin help}} template, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page.

Can any Checkuser like Jcpgordon (whatever the name is) explain to me how I'm an abuser of accounts. I am not an abuser of accounts period I'm being honest with you. I will still edit my talk page but I would like for a Cy to explain to me why I'm a abuser. I'm telling the truth I am not an abuser and I am not a sock of JiroDreamsOfMcRibs or anyone and I have no relationship with JiroDreamsOfMcRibs. I'm starting to cry. It's not fair! Please help! 😥 --LaurenCox600 (chat me here!) 04:58, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You should have cried before vandalizing wiki with sockpuppets! Oh wait, Supreme Genghis Khan? I still remember your disruption.

- INVISIBLE^-Talk! 10:54, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Even in the small amount of editing you have done on this talk page with this account, there are tell-tale signs that suggest that this account is run by the same person as the troll who used the name "JiroDreamsOfMcRibs". Add to those signs the technical evidence, and it is perfectly clear. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 14:56, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I really don't know why you guys are not listening to me or trusting me. Invincible Guy I am not Supreme Genghis Khan and I don't even know who that is. JamesBWatson, I am being honest I am not JiroDreamsOfMcRibs how can no one see that. Please believe me JamesBWatson I am not the same user as Supreme Genghis Khan. My indefblocked is not fair. I said this and I am going to say it again: Me and JiroDreamsOfMcRibs have no relationship at all I am telling the truth JamesBWatson. I will be good and stick to one account, this one JamesBWatson. --LaurenCox600 (chat me here!) 15:34, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

first unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

LaurenCox600 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Im not sure why you blocked me for. I didn't start editing yet and I haven't did anything to be blocked. Could you please explain to me why I got blocked for? --LaurenCox600 (chat me here!) 21:30, 24 June 2016 (UTC)(UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Your Technically indistinguishable to JiroDreamsOfMcRibs (talk · contribs). So in other words as a sock puppet account. PhilKnight (talk) 04:06, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

LaurenCox600 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

PhilKnight, if you are wondering, I am actually NOT JiroDreamsOfMcRibs (talk · contribs). I promise you that. I am actually not a sock of any account and JiroDreamsOfMcRibs and I are different if you or any admin want to know. I really want to edit here because I am not a sock of anybody. JiroDreamsOfMcRibs is actually a different person than me if you or any admin are wondering. I didn't admit to be a sock of anyone and Jiro is a different sock account. Just saying, --LaurenCox600 (chat me here!) 21:34, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Either a WP:SOCK or a WP:MEAT. Yamla (talk) 11:32, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

To Anthony Bradbury

"Just saying" cuts no ice here. What is your actual relationship to JiroDreamsOfMcRibs (talk · contribs)? If you wish ever to be unblocked now is a good time to be honest. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 10:03, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I will be honest Anthony. I am being honest and I am telling the truth. I am not JiroDreamsOfMcRibs in case you or anyone else is wondering. Me and JiroDreamsOfMcRibs are actually different accounts Anthony and I will be honest with you that me and Jiro are NOT related. That's my opinion. I am serious I'm not lying. I haven't admit to be a sock of anyone yet Anthony. Please reply Anthony. --LaurenCox600 (chat me here!) 21:36, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hopefully you reply Anthony I am telling the truth me and JiroDreamsOfMcRibs are not the same person. If you can't hopefully another admin replies to me in a friendly/nice way. --LaurenCox600 (chat me here!) 21:38, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

And I will stick to one account this one. Regards, --LaurenCox600 (chat me here!) 23:09, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I will promise to be good AB and I am being honest with you me and JiroDreamsOfMcRibs are not the same user trust me man I am ready to contribute. I'm not lying your thoughts on those comments Anthony! 🙁❤️LaurenCox600 (chat me here!) 04:00, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

LaurenCox600 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I will tell the truth and be really honest. I have no relationship with JiroDreamsOfMcRibs or any other sock and I promise you I will be able to contribute. I promise to be good and will now stick to this account. I don't want to say this and don't me mean to me when I say this: I am not a sock of anybody. Not JiroDreamsOfMcRibs. Not anyone. I hate to say this but I think this block was kinda shaky in my opinion. I am telling the truth and I am being honest. I am not a sock in telling the truth and nor am I got any relationship with JiroDreamsOfMcRibs. If any admin reviews this please respond in a nice way. I don't care if it's AB but if anyone replies to this, please say it in a nice way and treat me fair. I still want to use my talkpage even if you decline it. If anyone replies please I am begging you to PLEASE reply in a nice way. Thank you guys! Regards and take care, --LaurenCox600 (chat me here!) 04:20, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 04:31, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I just wanna cry I'm not a abuser period can't I just have some advice. Someone please reply I'm not an abuser how can you not see this? Just reduce my block to 1 year or 6 months if you can. Can any admin reply! Thanks! Smh! 🙁😥 --LaurenCox600 (chat me here!) 04:37, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Considering that at 2:41 a now blocked account created a page with Tikeem cumberbatch uttp tcgp own is a good man. He is a good sockmaster and will try to earn a barn star for socking, and then three minutes this account was created on the same IP, you don't have much of a leg to stand on. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 17:54, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I hate to say this Jpgordon but I don't want to be blocked indefinitely I am sorry to say that and don't be mean to me when I do say that I don't want to be blocked indefinitely. I also hate to say this but it's just not fair I be indefinitely blocked. I will say this and I will say it again: I will promise to be good and will from now on stick to one account, this one. --LaurenCox600 (chat me here!) 18:38, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your inability to be truthful pretty much eliminates any possibility of consideration. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 22:27, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

NeilN ^{talk to me} 18:48, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Three declined unblock requests are enough. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 18:49, 25 June 2016 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that her block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

LaurenCox600 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #16038 was submitted on Jun 26, 2016 15:33:24. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 15:33, 26 June 2016 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that her block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

LaurenCox600 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #16047 was submitted on Jun 28, 2016 15:29:54. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 15:29, 28 June 2016 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that her block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

LaurenCox600 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #16101 was submitted on Jul 09, 2016 01:41:12. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 01:41, 9 July 2016 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that her block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

LaurenCox600 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #16164 was submitted on Jul 18, 2016 02:13:06. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 02:13, 18 July 2016 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that her block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

LaurenCox600 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #20075 was submitted on Dec 15, 2017 16:30:08. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 16:30, 15 December 2017 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that her block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

LaurenCox600 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #20696 was submitted on Feb 21, 2018 15:54:48. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 15:54, 21 February 2018 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that her block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

LaurenCox600 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #20702 was submitted on Feb 21, 2018 22:34:06. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 22:34, 21 February 2018 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that her block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

LaurenCox600 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #21064 was submitted on Apr 01, 2018 17:16:02. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 17:16, 1 April 2018 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that her block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

LaurenCox600 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #21135 was submitted on Apr 07, 2018 17:46:39. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 17:46, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS Admin note Due to repeated unsuccessful appeals UTRS access has been revoked for 1 year. LaurenCox600 has also been advised to contact meta if they would like their global block reviewed.--Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 17:03, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Behavior on IRC

Flooding #wikipedia-en-unblock isn't going to get you anything but banned from #wikipedia-en-unblock . SQL ^{Query me!} 04:21, 10 January 2019 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that her block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

LaurenCox600 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #25072 was submitted on May 06, 2019 18:05:30. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 18:05, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS 41219

UTRS appeal #41219

This is a check user or oversight block. Please see your block log. The English Wikipedia unblock team is declining your unblock request and will not hear your case anymore. Your final avenue of appeal is to email the Arbitration Committee at arbcom-en

wikimedia.org. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 05:37, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]