User talk:Laska666

Laska666, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Laska666! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like GreenMeansGo (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:02, 7 July 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited French conquest of Vietnam, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Annam.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Laska666

Thank you for creating Rudravarman I.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 00:12, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Laska666

Thank you for creating Ja Lidong's Rebellion.

User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for the redirect.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 11:35, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Laska666

Thank you for creating Gangaraja.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 17:41, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 2

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Đại Việt, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Red River.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:47, 2 July 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Xiangkhouang rebellion (1834) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Xiangkhouang rebellion (1834) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Xiangkhouang rebellion (1834) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

ComplexRational (talk) 01:58, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Art of Champa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Javanese.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 25 July 2022 (UTC)

Anglo-Vietnamese conflict (1808)

I have the Lamb book and the referenced pages don't cover the subjects they're referenced to - not even the same year. Are you sure the references are correct? Acroterion (talk) 20:51, 7 August 2022 (UTC)

Please respond to this, the references, and the entire article, are in doubt. Acroterion (talk) 12:06, 16 August 2022 (UTC)

User:Acroterion - also, page 508 does not exist in either volume of Crawfurd's Journal of an Embassy from the Governor-General of India to the Courts of Siam and Cochin China: Exhibiting a View of the Actual State of Those Kingdoms. This is not the first time that Laska666 has written their own narrative and cited whatever. 79.251.251.208 (talk) 12:38, 16 August 2022 (UTC)

I am considering bringing this up at ANI, since there is a broad range of articles that may be called into question if this is a pattern of conduct. Acroterion (talk) 12:43, 16 August 2022 (UTC)

I just rethink & admit that both Journal of an Embassy from the Governor-General of India to the Courts of Siam and Cochin China: Exhibiting a View of the Actual State of Those Kingdoms and Lamb's book are actually not good sources. The only article that should be examined is Les Anglais à Macao en 1802 by M. C. B. Maybon, accordingly, Drury's ELC expedition in Tonkin was a brief stopover attempt to open Vietnam to trade. The outcome was unsuccessful and the British fleet then moved to Portuguese Macao.

Well then, can you properly cite the material and remove whatever isn't supportable by references? Acroterion (talk) 16:23, 17 August 2022 (UTC)

So why did you cite what are clearly the wrong sources in the first places, and what assurance do we have that the present ones are correct? Why is there no mention in more accessible media about six or seven British ships destroyed? This seems like an odd omission from the well-document history of the Royal Navy. Acroterion (talk) 01:59, 19 August 2022 (UTC)

There are a truckload of soapboxing edits recently eg see South Vietnam and also the AfD on the pov fork/essay Kingdom of Vietnam that was AFDed Bumbubookworm (talk) 21:38, 22 August 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 18

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Anglo-Vietnamese conflict (1808)

added a link pointing to Red River

Tai peoples

added a link pointing to Black River

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 18 August 2022 (UTC)

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Acroterion (talk) 00:58, 23 August 2022 (UTC)

I await your response at ANI. As other editors have noted, you've ignored ANI issues before.I will not allow this matter to drop without action. Acroterion (talk) 22:34, 24 August 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Anglo-Vietnamese conflict (1808) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Anglo-Vietnamese conflict (1808) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anglo-Vietnamese conflict (1808) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Acroterion (talk) 00:50, 24 August 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Anglo-Vietnamese conflict (1808), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Red River.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

Blocked from article space

Since you haven't participated at the ANI discussion or responded here, I've blocked you from article space until you constructively address the concerns of other editors about your sourcing and referencing. Acroterion (talk) 23:42, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

• I apologize for what my faults, however, I didn't respond because I Couldn't manage to do anything for Wikipedia at the beginning of fall semester. The block and following accusation of refusing to communicate or address concerns about sourcing and referencing isn't fully correct and a little bit personal regarding the editor is busy irl as usual. Laska666 (talk) 16:33, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

• • The refusing to communicate is primarily in response to previous events in which you've not communicated after your conduct was brought up at ANI. This is not the first instance. Acroterion (talk) 16:45, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

Bhadravarman (Đồng Dương) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Bhadravarman (Đồng Dương), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 22:28, 30 August 2022 (UTC)

Everything about the founder of the Bhrgu dynasty, King Indravarman II, is listed in a Dong Duong Cham slab inscription C. 66, written in Sanskrit, the liturgical language of Buddhism. It was engraved in May 875 and a testimony of how widespread Mahayana Buddhism was in Champa.

Line 19:

tasmaj jajñe raja sñdhih sñ rudravarmanámá yah / tasya sutah khyátayasáh sñsahito bhadravarmavibhuh

From him was born the intelligent king Sri Rudravarman. The son of the latter was the far-famed king Sri Bhadravarman

Line 20:

sríindravarmmaviditas sünuá sri bhadravarmmanas tasya mahesvaraprabhavac campanagare nrpo bhavati

The son of Sri Bhadravarman, known as Sri Indravarman has become the king of Campa through the grace of Maheávara.

We can see freely that Indravarman was the son of Sri Bhadravarman. His mom was Maheávara. His grandpa was Rudravarman. They were builders and royals of Campadesa (nowadays Vietnam). Indravarman ascended the position Mahārājādhirājā/pu pő tana rayā (great king of kings) in 875 and ordered the construction of a Mahayana Buddhist monastery in Dong Duong. That's the fact toldin rock indisputable.Laska666 (talk) 16:51, 4 September 2022 (UTC)

Tribhuvanadevi moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Tribhuvanadevi, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 22:29, 30 August 2022 (UTC)

@Mccapra:, are you sure that these articles aren't ready for mainspace? They look like typical stubs and their notability can honestly quite easily be established by the fact that they're Cham royalty about which plenty is written in both Vietnamese and French, the issue is that the creator tends to prioritise English-language sources (see also the AfD for the "Kingdom of Vietnam" article where they dismissed multiple reliable sources for being written in Vietnamese). I'm not sure if moving them to draftspace really benefits anyone as these articles are now "invisible" to anyone and it's highly unlikely that the people working in draftspace will actually improve them there. A simple Ecosia search will find a number of sources that mention her mostly in Vietnamese, though I assume that most sources are offline.

My main argument above being that stubs aren't supposed to be assumed to not be notable unless notability cannot be established. While I personally don't write stubs I commonly find stubs that have a lot of information about them that can be expanded, simply deleting stubs because of the fact that they're stubs seems counterproductive to me. --Donald Trung (talk) 09:25, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

@Donald Trung: hi the issue is primarily that they have a single source, unfortunately offline, so don’t meet our requirements. In addition the article creator has been blocked for creating hoax articles. If the draftified articles can show notability through additional referencing I’m happy to move them back to mainspace, but for the time being the suspicion is that they’re hoaxes. Mccapra (talk) 21:17, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

@Mccapra:, other than "Royal Vietnamese army" I don't think that user "Laska666" has ever created an actual hoax, most of their edits seem to revolve around POV-pushing, though this seems largely limited to "Kinh history" (the history of Vietnam outside of ethnic minority history). If you want to explore what kind of hoaxes they push I'd say seeing Đại Việt as a continuous state until 1802 (not 1804 for whatever reason) and including all names prior to the Nguyễn into this category and seeing it afterwards as the "Kingdom of Vietnam", they also spread the idea that all institutions of the Nguyễn were abolished in 1885... Alright, I can see now why they're accused of being a Hoaxer, but I haven't seen them do the same with the history of Champa, in fact they've been doing largely well in the last half year or so.

That aside, people aren't really able to expand the article and add additional sources of the article is in draftspace. At least if an article is nominated for deletion people will try to improve it and look for additional sources, when an article is draftified it gets ignored and then quietly deleted by a bot. So I'd say that nominating these articles for deletion might even be a better alternative because there will be at least some eyeballs on them by people willing to investigate and verify these articles. --Donald Trung (talk) 21:41, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

@Donald Trung: Well there’s nothing stopping you nominating it for deletion if you think that’s a better course of actions. Mccapra (talk) 22:14, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

Mccapra, I'm not allowed to. First of all it's in draftspace which I'm not allowed to edit, second of all it wouldn't go through AfD (which I am allowed to edit) but MfD. So I can't do anything with it, there also isn't a "nominate for deletion" button here like there is at the Wikimedia Commons. -- — Donald Trung (talk) 22:18, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

Ha Trung stele (Quang Tri province, dated 917 AD). The stele recorded the donation of queen Tribhuvanadevi to a local temple of Siva.

Line 4a:

sritribhuvanadevyah srih punyanani sthanam üdhakírttih syatpratimalingo devo nityam sri Indrakantesah

the chaste Tribhuvanadevi installed the image of Indrakantesa out of devotion.Laska666 (talk) 17:07, 4 September 2022 (UTC)

A so-called "POV-pusher" is just someone who interested in history and doesn't like the downplaying of achievements of indigenous American, Asian and African societies by inserting whites...

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tribhuvanadevi has been accepted

Tribhuvanadevi, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

~Styyx^Talk? 20:43, 24 September 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bhadravarman (Đồng Dương) (November 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Asilvering was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bhadravarman (Đồng Dương) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

asilvering (talk) 10:14, 1 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:48, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Blocked from editing

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Laska666. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 09:58, 4 February 2023 (UTC)