User talk:Laguna greg
Hi Folks, I've been doing a lot of work expanding the article on Frieda Belinfante. Frieda was very unusal person and my first piano teacher. Amazingly, there's bunches of material available now about her and her activities during the war that simply were not available, at all, when I first knew her. It's really cool! Laguna greg (talk) 23:04, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
I'm done with Frieda, so I'm going to move on to the Dorothy Taubman page. It needs TONS of work!!!! And it happens to be a subject in which I am expert, having known her and her theories about piano technique. Laguna greg (talk) 18:41, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
Welcome![edit]
Hello, Laguna greg, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, visit the Teahouse Q&A forum, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!
Hi, Laguna greg. Thanks for developing the Frieda Belinfante article. Well done! I was previously unaware of her or the connection to Laguna Beach -- but she was quite a fascinating person -- and deserves a quality page.
However, I do have a problem with the intro sentence and the last paragraph of the The Orange County Philharmonic section which states Belinfante was fired because of her lesbianism. This information is referenced to an unpublished source -- and that fails our policy on WP:RS. Especially when reliable sources offer a different version. (e.g., "Belinfante left the Philharmonic Society in 1962, when, she said, the board decided to import big-name orchestras rather than cultivate a local symphony." LA Times, 1988, "A bigger obstacle was the unwillingness by the community to support a woman conductor; even members of her own board suggested it was time to bring in a man. 'There wasn't strong support for a woman to be in the public. Old-timers were very staunch supporters of me. Elaine Redfield, who has always been a very faithful friend, fought for me but lost.' LA Times, 1987) She confirms this in this 1994 interview. Although in the Muller interview, she discusses her belief that gossip about her sexual orientation was a factor in her contract not being renewed, there is no factual evidence of this.
Therefore, the article must state the facts as presented by the reliable published sources. At best, we can also add a sentence like: In a 1994 interview, Belifante said she suspected her contract was not renewed due to gossip about sexual orientation. Then reference it to page 66 of the Muller Interview. But without a reliable published secondary source, the text as currently written does not meet Wikipedia policy for WP:RS or WP:V. I'm sorry about that. Cheers. — CactusWriter (talk) 23:56, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
- By the way, I always like to keep replies to queries on my talk page. So you may wish to watchlist our conversation there -- so that I don't clutter your talk page with these templates. Cheers. — CactusWriter (talk) 00:40, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
RSI[edit]
Thanks for your work on the page! I'm glad to see someone is stepping up to the plate and reworking the article. a13ean (talk) 21:22, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:45, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Diacritics[edit]
Hi, Laguna greg.
I'm just wondering about your diacritics on "École Nôrmale de Mûsique" on your user page. École Normale de Musique seems to do without the circumflexes. Is there something Wikipedia doesn't know, or is this by way of your little joke? Cheers. -- Jack of Oz [pleasantries] 00:38, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks for your reply on my user talk page.
- In case you weren't aware of it, this query at the Reference Desk may interest/intrigue you. Cheers. -- Jack of Oz [pleasantries] 22:49, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]
Hello, Laguna greg. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
September 2018[edit]
Hello, I'm Toohool. I noticed that you made a comment on the page Talk:Gambler's fallacy that didn't seem very civil, so it has been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Toohool (talk) 03:42, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
- People can say whatever they like about my edits, but it should be reasonably polite. Ad hominem rarely adds anything to a debate.--♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 05:41, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
In response to your comment on my talk page: You can find your original comment by viewing the History tab of the talk page. This is the comment that I removed. The talk pages are for constructive discussion of how to improve the article, not for making uncivil personal attacks such as suggesting that another editor needs therapy. Toohool (talk) 00:10, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]
Hello, Laguna greg. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)