User talk:Ktsquare/Archive II

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Series table[edit]

Should Xia Dynasty be added to the table? (Answer on my talk) --Jiang 08:49, 2 Jan 2004 (UTC)

Replied on Talk:History of China b/c the answer may also be useful to other wikipedians. 大将军, 都督中外诸军事 (talk) 00:31, 3 Jan 2004 (UTC)

Some minor modifications for the rest of them: I took out the second appearace of History of China in the table because we only need to link it once. I also removed the line break in the heading since the table is wide enough for it to fit one line. --Jiang 08:51, 2 Jan 2004 (UTC)

Sure 大将军, 都督中外诸军事 (talk) 00:31, 3 Jan 2004 (UTC)

Did you just vote on a six month old vote at Talk:List of French monarchs? Not sure what ever happened with that... john 05:21, 7 Jan 2004 (UTC)

I thought the vote still hasn't been OFFICIALLY ended. 大将军, 都督中外诸军事 (talk) 04:46, 8 Jan 2004 (UTC)
Yeah, nothing ever happened with that...it was all basically about fighting a troll who insisted on including the Merovingians. And then the troll left, and so on and so forth, and we never got back to figuring out what to do. john 05:38, 8 Jan 2004 (UTC)

Family trees[edit]

Hello Ktsquare! The answer for "what is the family tree software" is "there is no software". I just draw them by hand in Corel Draw and then export the files to a *png format. I would be glad to help but as you will understand, chinese languages for me are chinese. Does wiki has some kind of way to transport images across languages? Because Baldhur also wnats the family trees in the German wiki. Cheers, Muriel Victoria 09:42, 8 Jan 2004 (UTC)

rocks and minerals project[edit]

Since you've contributed in the rocks and minerals area before, wanted to let you know that I created a WikiProject Rocks and Minerals if you'd like to join. Elf 05:01, 5 Feb 2004 (UTC)

signed up already :) 大将军, 都督中外诸军事 (talk) 04:37, 8 Feb 2004 (UTC)

Geneaology[edit]

The Sima family tree is great. I added it to List of family trees. Try saving diagrams in PNG instead of JPG to eliminate the artifact like those liquid paper-like smudges around the names. ----Menchi 10:41, 4 Mar 2004 (UTC)

Emperors[edit]

I've been using the info on the individual dynasty pages, which is usually the same as that on Table of Chinese monarchs, but it seems to me that the table of emperors for each dynasty should have its own page, linked to the relevant dynasty page but not on it. If the tables are on the dynasty page, it makes the page too long and cumbersome (the Chinese monarchs page is already way too long), especially as the entries get more developed and more detailed as time goes by. They are not needed there, but should be easily accessible. I've already done that with the Qing dynasty, and plan to with the Ming dynasty when I can get around to it. That's my humble opinion anyway... Madw 14:21, 20 Mar 2004 (UTC)

Go for what you have planned for as I don't oppose reasonable and sensible moves. Ktsquare (talk) 17:49, 22 Mar 2004 (UTC)

Matriarchal past[edit]

Do you have materials that could shade light on the discussions at Talk:Chinese family name#Matrilineal surname? --Menchi 21:59, 12 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

replied there. Ktsquare (talk) 04:02, 13 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

I just noticed your Wikipedian with Chinese interest page. Good job organizing this. You deserve much of the credit for keeping a tightly run ship on the China-related articles and helping users stay well organized on these pages. I'm also honored to be included among such an able group of users. 172 18:48, 19 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]


Splitting those Era of Disarray Up[edit]

It's much more digestible that you've sliced the 16 Kingdoms up into Cheng Han et al. It'd be nice if you can complete that slicing process, and also do it for the 5-10 bunch. The appreciative reader, --Menchi 05:21, 22 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

okay Ktsquare (talk) 18:06, 24 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

Chinese Cannibalism[edit]

Ktsquare, have not seen the Kuwabara Jitsuzo text you referred to in VfD. Can you provide a pointer? Thanks. Fuzheado | Talk 02:31, 25 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

I am working on it. Ktsquare (talk) 02:43, 25 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

I mean commented work at the talk page and the pointer will be provided there. Ktsquare (talk) 05:20, 25 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Ktsquare. I understand what you mean and I have that feeling too. But what I mean is that we should not hide the things really occured in our history which would be regarded as ugliness, rudeness or bloodiness in the modern time just because we are caring too much what others think. They did and do have discriminations. But we should not cry out like children just because the they, foreigners, especially the people have some anti-China thoughts, pointed out something wrong with us. The truth is truth. We will be truely respectable when we can face them all. People said: 知耻而后勇. If there was anything I said made you sad, I am sorry.

---yACHT nAVEL 17:42, 26 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

Well said. You have earned my respect. I.H.S.V. (talk)

MediaWiki[edit]

Your welcome - it's a pleasure. - Madw 07:37, May 26, 2004 (UTC)

I have the occasional look at the Chinese version, but there's never enough time for everything I want to do! - Madw 08:28, May 26, 2004 (UTC)

Talk:Dan, Crown Prince of Yan. Badanedwa 22:22, Jun 21, 2004 (UTC)

replied. I.H.S.V. (talk)

Wikiproject Chinese Cities[edit]

Want to help me on WikiProject Chinese cities? Colipon 04:57, 6 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Your expertise is appreciated on Asian Cup 2004 (history), where POV has become a problem with User:Nanshu and User:TakuyaMurata. Fuzheado | Talk 02:16, 15 Aug 2004 (UTC)

replied there. Ktsquare (talk) 16:52, 18 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Unit 731 protected[edit]

FYI, I've protected Unit 731 and moved the disputed text/photo to the talk page. Feel free to discuss there. Thanks. Fuzheado | Talk 02:06, 23 Aug 2004 (UTC)

checked. I.H.S.V. (talk)

Naming conventions for place names in China[edit]

Hi Ktsquare:

If you have time, please take a look at Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (Chinese). We need help in hammering out a sensible set of naming conventions for Chinese place names.

A table summarizing the tentative conventions in use is at Wikipedia:Naming conventions (Chinese)#Summary.

Thanks. -- [[User:Ran|ran (talk)]] 14:23, Aug 26, 2004 (UTC)

checked. I.H.S.V. (talk)

Proposed formatting of Chinese Emperor articles[edit]

Since you've been the person working on these articles, please take a look at Wikipedia_talk:Manual_of_Style_for_China-related_articles#Emperors_formatting. --Jiang 00:04, 28 Aug 2004 (UTC)

checked. I.H.S.V. (talk)

Image:Mesitylene.jpg[edit]

Hi there! Thanks for adding the image Image:Mesitylene.jpg. It currently doesn't have an image copyright tag, and I was hoping that you would add one as untagged images may be deleted eventually. (You can use {{gfdl}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{fairuse}} if you claim fair use, etc.) Thanks! --Diberri | Talk 18:17, Sep 1, 2004 (UTC)

Hello, I see you've made numerous edits at Huns in the past, and you may be familiar with the elaborately named and dated tables of dynasties that are laid out at that entry. Would you contribute a brief introduction to those sections, telling readers how we happen to have such complete material, and giving the most familiar form of the annals where this material was preserved? Just tell readers what anyone familiar with this history would know. Thank you. Wetman 21:19, 2 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Hello, Zestauferov provided the tables of dynasties and asked me for the corresponding Chinese characters which I provided. I would refer your question to Zestauferov. The exceptions are the kingdoms of Han Zhao and Later Zhao for which I have writtem two stubs. Ktsquare (talk) 20:59, 11 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Your image of Sihanouk[edit]

Hi! Thanks for uploading Image:Sihanouk.jpg. (It's even on the front page today!) I notice it currently doesn't have an image copyright tag. Could you add one to let us know its copyright status? (You can use {{gfdl}} if you release it under the GFDL, or {{fairuse}} if you claim fair use, etc.) Thanks so much, Quadell (talk) (help)[[]] 13:28, Oct 8, 2004 (UTC)

Thanks for getting back with me. I tagged it as fair use. Quadell (talk) (help)[[]] 20:56, Oct 11, 2004 (UTC)

China-related topics[edit]

You may be interested in the new Wikipedia:China-related topics notice board. --Jiang 02:16, 24 Oct 2004 (UTC)

bookmarked in my watchlist. Ktsquare (talk) 05:08, 29 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Article Licensing[edit]

I've "started" the Free the Rambot Articles Project which aims to get users to release all of their contributions to the U.S. state, county, and city articles (if any) under the CC-by-sa 1.0 and 2.0 license (at minimum) or into the public domain if they prefer. A secondary, but equally important, goal is to get those users to release ALL of their edits for ALL articles. I've personally chosen to multi-license all of the rambot and Ram-Man contributions under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike License so that other projects, such as WikiTravel, can use our articles. I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all your contributions (or at minimum those on the geographic articles) so that we can keep most of the articles available under the multi-license. Many users use the {{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}} template (or even {{MultiLicensePD}} for public domain) on their user page, but there are other templates for other options at Template messages/User namespace. If you only prefer using the GFDL, I understand, but I thought I'd at least ask, just in case, since the number of your edits is in the top 100. If you do want to do it, simply just copy and paste one of the above two templates into your user page and it will allow us to track those users who have done it. For example:

Option 1
I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:
{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}

OR

Option 2
I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions to any [[U.S. state]], county, or city article as described below:
{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}

Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain (which many people do or don't like to do, see Wikipedia:Multi-licensing), you could replace {{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}} with {{MultiLicensePD}} -- Ram-Man 00:05, Nov 26, 2004 (UTC)

Seal script[edit]

Hi, and thanks for your comment on my talk page. About the seal script, I found it on a website that I discovered recently, at www.chineseetymology.org. A really great site, the first time I see so many examples of ancient Chinese scripts accessible so easily. Hardouin 17:52, 6 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Thanx. I.H.S.V. (talk)

Louis X of France[edit]

Hello. In Louis X of France link to Polish Wikipedia should be [[pl:Ludwik X K%C5%82%C3%B3tliwy]] not [[pl:Ludwik X Kłótliwy]]. Regards Lzur 07:36, 29 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Thanx. I.H.S.V. (talk)

Thanks for uploading the image

I notice it currently doesn't have an image copyright tag. Could you add one to let us know its copyright status? (You can use {{gfdl}} if you release it under the GFDL, or {{fairuse}} if you claim fair use, etc.) If you don't know what any of this means, just let me know where you got the image and I'll tag it for you. Thanks, Kbh3rd 16:23, 8 Jan 2005 (UTC)

It's already been deleted. thanx Ktsquare (talk) 06:29, 9 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Here is another untagged image: Image:Ring Lardner Jr..jpg. Same rules as above apply. Hit my up on my user page if you want me to tag it. It is currently tagged {{unverified}}. Thanks! --MaxPower 20:20, 2005 Jan 11 (UTC)
Checked. I.H.S.V. (talk)

nl wikipedia[edit]

Hello KTsquare first of all thx for your great work with interwikilinks. One small note though. On the Dutch wiki we put interwikilinks in alphabetical order of ISO code, this means that fi: comes before fr: and not at the end as is done in the english wikipedia. I noticed that everytime you change the order in which fi: is placed. Thx again for your help! Waerth 05:01, 13 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Thanx. I.H.S.V. (talk)

Image[edit]

The image is of a mosaic of Christ at Hagia Sophia, and was taken by me in May 2002. Adam 02:36, 18 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Thanx. I.H.S.V. (talk)

This image that you uploaded a year ago has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Thuresson 04:54, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC)

replied on VFD. Ktsquare (talk) 01:52, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Image:Mausoleum of Theodoric.jpg[edit]

Hello Ktsquare,

I've a question about Image:Mausoleum of Theodoric.jpg. It has not yet a copyrightstatus and the link that is placed on the descriptionpage is broken.
We use this picture on the Dutch Wikibooks, but we in Holland and Belgium aren't allowed to use pics under the fair use licence. Do you know anything more about the copyrightstatus?
Yours sincerly, Koos Discussion 09:10, 2005 Mar 29 (UTC) (b:nl:Overleg gebruiker:Firefox)

Thanks for the labour you do for me. I hope the reply of the Ufficio Turismo del Comune di Ravenna will be positive. Koos Discussion 07:55, 2005 Mar 30 (UTC)

Thema[edit]

I'm not sure where to find extensive information about that on the Internet, but try http://cc.ece.ntua.gr/~conster/English/PageData/byz_themas.htm, that seems to be pretty informative. Adam Bishop 12:35, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Thanx. I.H.S.V. (talk)

HKWNB, HKCOTW, Current events[edit]

Hi. I noticed you have edited some Hong Kong-related articles. You might be interested to take a look at HK wikipedians' notice board, HK Collaboration of the Week and Current events in Hong Kong and Macao. Happy editing! — Instantnood 12:38, Apr 13, 2005 (UTC)

Thanx. I.H.S.V. (talk)

WYK[edit]

Hello, fellow Wahyanite. The zh Wikipage on our alma mater looks good. Nice work. I may have some e-pictures, but I have to look. ... BTW, this at the WYKAAO website may be useful if you want to expand the alumni section. (N.B. Mike M.C. Lo in 1988 was actually the first 10-A scorer in HKCEE only in WYK, but the second in HK. The first ever 10-A scorer in HKCEE came from WYHK in 1987. Dr. Lo is not too impressed with the error...) -- PFHLai 13:30, 2005 Apr 13 (UTC)

Oh, no ! You've found my old webpage ! Don't tell me you've found my face in the Shield, too ! 8-) -- PFHLai 16:43, 2005 Apr 13 (UTC)

References on East Asia[edit]

Thanks for contacting me about accountable references and especially search services on East Asian studies. I know the trouble you are having. There is so much information on the WWW but so little is properly referenced, and this is also true of the Wikipedia (which is why I spend so much time adding references whenever I can). I can only suggest that you check reputable websites (such as the Silk Road Foundation, Silk Road Seattle, and various websites that give Full Text copies of important documents). If you let me know what specifically you are looking for I will do my best to steer you in the right direction to find it. I am looking forward to checking out your websites too. I may then have a better idea of what you are doing and what might be of interest to you.

Now, please excuse me as I must rush. I am editing my first book for publication later this year as a paperback, and I am well behind schedule (and also my Chinese input program has just broken down, and my son's wife has just had a lovely baby girl), so it looks like a busy time ahead!!!

All my very best wishes,

Cheers,

John Hill

Thanx. I.H.S.V. (talk)

Nine-grade system[edit]

Hey, do you mind checking what I wrote on Nine-rank_system, and see its historical accuracy? Colipon+(T) 05:03, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Checked. I.H.S.V. (talk)

great[edit]

You are very outstanding for know many kinds of languages.--Memes 18:26, 12 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I knew, you register only except English.--Memes 18:41, 12 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

List of past Chinese ethnic groups?[edit]

I have queried the use of 'Past Chinese ethnic groups' as a title for that page (see Talk). There hasn't been any response yet. What are your ideas on this?

As you wrote the bulk of the article on the Juan_Juan, I believe you are also best qualified to comment on my suggestion that the article should be placed under Rouran rather than Juan Juan. The grounds are the very ones that you stated yourself -- Juan Juan was a derogatory name that they were called by the Chinese. The Rouran may not be around any more, but surely they have the right to go down to posterity with something approaching their own name, not an insult made by their enemies! Would be interested to hear your views.

Bathrobe

responded on the corresponding page. I.H.S.V. (talk) 21:27, 25 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

VMI peer review[edit]

You've worked on the VMI article. I have posted the article Virginia Military Institute at Wikipedia:Peer review/Virginia Military Institute/archive1 and would appreciate your comments. Rillian 14:21, 7 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

User categorisation[edit]

Greetings, Ktsquare/Archive II! Please accept this message as an invitation to categorise your user page in the category Category:Chinese Wikipedians overseas and removing your name from the Wikipedia:Wikipedians/China#Overseas page. The page will be deleted when all users have been removed. Even if you do not wish to be placed in a category, could you take a moment to remove your name from the Wikipedia:Wikipedians/China#Overseas page? Thanks!!

To add your name to the category, please use the tag [[Category:Chinese Wikipedians overseas|Ktsquare/Archive II]] to ensure proper sorting.

For more information, please see Wikipedia:User categorisation and Category:Wikipedians by location. --Miborovsky 02:51, 9 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

You were listed on the Wikipedia:Wikipedians/Ontario page as living in or being associated with Ontario. As part of the Wikipedia:User categorisation project, these lists are being replaced with user categories. If you would like to add yourself to the category that is replacing the page, please visit Category:Wikipedians in Ontario for instructions.--Rmky87 03:46, 10 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

VMI peer review[edit]

You've worked on the VMI article. I have posted the article, Virginia Military Institute, at Wikipedia:Peer review/Virginia Military Institute/archive1 and would appreciate your comments. Rillian 00:50, 10 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Xuzhou or Battle of Taierzhuang[edit]

Your draft of the Battle of Taierzhuang seems great, but the Battle of Taierzhuang is sometimes considered a part of Battle of Xuzhou(台儿庄大捷是徐州会战中中国军队取得的一次重大胜利), and IMHO some part of the Battle you described is not part of the Battle of Taierzhuang.

Would you like to point out which part of my description is not part of the Battle. I.H.S.V. (talk) 04:40, 19 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The battle in 1st War Zone , and the execution of Han Fuqu, for example. --Skyfiler 03:33, 20 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ktsquare. Just wanna let you know that I've come across an old file of the school badge and added it to the WYK page. Had your defence yet ? Good luck. Cheers. -- PFHLai 17:47, 16 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Cool. I.H.S.V. (talk) 04:40, 19 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Trouble with the two versions template[edit]

Hello. Could you advise what I should do to such situation: [1]? Briefly, it was resulted from the new section that I've added for Macao. User:Huaiwei insisted it should instead be spelt "Macau". Both spellings are used by the Macanese government in English, but "Macao" is preferred, and is the spelling used in the English name printed on the passports the government issues. In my opinion, no particular preference should be given to any of the two spellings, as colour vs. color. To avoid edit warring, I put on the {{twoversions}} tag, but Huaiwei keeps reverting back to the other version which he prefers. — Instantnood 17:01, 7 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I would just like to take this opportunity to point out (for the sake of balance in arguments), that Instantnood has been unwilling in recognising the fact that a spelling dispute exists [2], let alone displaying a genuine desire in dispute resolution. Even after being reminded that the spelling controversy is far from over, he proceeded to continue using Macao in all his edits including in the above article, knowing full well that others disapprove of it. He tried to use the {{twoversions}} tag on his version, but fails to also conduct discussion in the relevant talkpage until I lambasted him for it [3]. The discussion there appears to be grinding to a rapid halt, as has also happened in Talk:Macau, something he probably forsees. Hence his preference for over-using {{twoversions}}, as he uses the impasse and stalled discussions to justify the continued display of his prefered version. As for content issues over how Macau should be spelt, it is all there in the relevant talk pages as mentioned. Instantnood's inclusion of his views on this content matter in your talk page suggests to me that he is far from nuetral in his call for outside comments.
I do hope you may take these facts into your consideration when assessing this issue. Thank you, and I apologise in advance if this amounts to misusing your talk page.--Huaiwei 17:30, 7 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

For your information, Ktsquare, that my policy in using the {{twoversions}} template is to display a version according to what the certain article was like before the disputes. I do not choose a version to display arbitrarily, nor a version that I preferred. List of railway in China is an example.

As for Macao/Macau, it's unavoidable to choose one of the two spellings when adding new content, like creating new articles, or adding information about Macao/Macau to articles that previously have nothing about Macao/Macau. — Instantnood 17:45, 7 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Merge[edit]

Hi can you please help merge the edit history of University (MTR) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) and Shek Tong Tsui (MTR) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) under the title Shek Tong Tsui (MTR)? An anonymous contributor has started the article with a new title, instead of using the move button. Thanks. — Instantnood 16:50, 13 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]


Hi, perhaps you'd like to take a look at my changes to article, to check them over.--File Éireann 00:17, 20 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

checked