User talk:Knutinh
January 2009[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to HDMI, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses novel, unpublished syntheses of previously published material. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. Hi, I like others have reverted your changes. Two reasons: 1st please read WP:HOWTO and WP:SOURCES which doesn't include blogs, also it was quite WP:POV. 2nd, although in its current form is inappropriate for Wikipedia in general, the content would be more appropriate with the HDCP or Blu-ray article, not HDMI itself. Also note that "HDMI" is designated as a WP:Good Article, which means it is to be used as an example of how an article should look and also means it is now scrutinized more than some other articles. Anyways, please continue editing as your other contributions are technically sound. Any questions, contact me. Furthermore note that I added a short sentence to the end of the section as what I thought was your general point was relevant (a HDMI port ⇏ playable protected content) -- KelleyCook (talk) 16:05, 9 January 2009 (UTC) KelleyCook (talk) 16:05, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
I politely disagree about WP:POV. I think that the article fails to recognize that there are many people out there who actually have problems using HDMI on their PC the way that they had hoped to, and the way that marketing has made them believe that they can. I dont think that this is my POV talking, but an objective fact.
The mere fact that such struggles are not described in scientific papers but in discussion forums and on blogs does not warrant biasing an article in the direction of overly positive manufacturer reports.
I also think that the Anantech article that still is quoted in other parts of the HDMI-article is the best thing in the way of reputable sources, and I actually found coverage for most of the statements there. Do you think that it is fair to quote only positive parts of an article, neglecting negatives?
Your points about where to put this info are valid, although it is an interop-issue between Bluray, PCs and HDMI. I really cant see why it belongs more to one or the other, since it is the combination of all three that is relevant. The question is: if there is a real problem with the three, should wikipedia fail to mention it because it is difficult to place? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Knutinh (talk • contribs)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:20, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
File:Timing.png listed for discussion[edit]
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Timing.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:30, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
