Hello fellow wikipedians, I do not contest any deletions, I may start stubs on random topics and simply not expand on them, this may not conform to wikipedia's guidelines, but it provides an avenue for thought and helps legitimize the creation of the page later. Thank you for reading this bootlegged header and have a nice day.[edit]

Removing comments[edit]

You know perfectly well that removing comments on article talk pages are not OK as long as they are legitimate. I have contacted another user who will take a look. You can not remove a comment simply because it is a comment which does not support your view . I will keep my eyes on you. Regards.--BabbaQ (talk) 06:39, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Klopsikon. I did take a look. Perhaps the removal was an accident due to an edit conflict? The two timestamps are the same. You're a fairly experienced user, so I'm sure you know talkpage etiquette. Bishonen | talk 09:23, 8 April 2014 (UTC).[reply]

Hello, Bishonen and BabbaQ. I am not sure which talkpage you are making reference to but I did not remove any comments. Due to the high volume of traffic to the Donetsk Republic page, which I believe you are referencing, there may very likely have been an edit conflict (in fact I do remember there being a few times when I posted comments where it did tell me about an edit conflict occuring). I apologize if any people were inconvenienced by this. Klopsikon (talk) 13:02, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

And I apologize if I overreacted. I probably would not have reacted like that if it had not been a removal on talk page about a current and hot topic. I will restore the comment and no worries :).--BabbaQ (talk) 17:19, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]