User talk:Kingchamar

March 2015

Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Chamar, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page.

Kingchamar, you are teetering on the edge of an indefinite block now. Blanking your talk page as you have done will not change that. How many more times must people advise you of the reliable sources policy? What is it that you do not understand? Pinging Bbb23. Sitush (talk) 13:45, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

• @Kingchamar, the only reason I haven't blocked you is because your recent edits to Chamar are not restoring the material that you were trying to insert before your last blocks (with the exception of one item that is the same). So, I'm giving you a last chance. Don't persist in edit warring, or you risk being blocked indefinitely.--Bbb23 (talk) 14:01, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

Sitush Bbb23 You said i can use google books as a source of information and that is what i have done Kingchamar (talk) 18:23, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

You've used that false assertion before; it won't wash.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:30, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

Bbb23 Yes before i did not use any reference and now i have used a reference and googlebooks is my reference so now i have found a book about this page and have used citations Kingchamar (talk) 15:44, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

And still you do not understand WP:RS. Just because something is on the web does not necessarily make it useful. - Sitush (talk) 02:05, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

And you've done it again, inserting H. A. Rose even after you took the matter to WP:RSN and were told it was inappropriate to use in the way that you do. - Sitush (talk) 19:13, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

April 2015

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for the third resumption of edit warring at Chamar after expiration of each block (WP:IDHT). If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 22:11, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kingchamar (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Sorry i forgot H.A Rose is an unreliable source, i should of double checked before i edited the page. I will not insert any information in the page chamar again without confirming. I know i have done that a few times but this time i didn't mean it. ThankYou Kingchamar (talk) 18:40, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

Decline reason:

It was made very clear that you were being given a last chance, and you blew it. Collateral damage on your network is not our problem. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 19:04, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Sorry for disrupting you but can you do a temporary block because it has blocked the whole wikipedia across my network which i didn't realise as i am new to wikipedia and it has blocked my brothers account which he wants to use. So sorry i will not do it again. Thankyou for you co-operation.

I have now tagged your user page as a  Confirmed sock master.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:20, 25 April 2015 (UTC)