User talk:Kghusker

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hey, Kghusker here, thanks to the Wikipedians who contributed here, whose notes I then summarized. Please feel welcome to add more!

Bookmarks[edit]

Notes[edit]

  • Please be sure to capitalize when you rate. For example, |class=Stub not |class=stub.
  • Delete personal pages with {{db-owner}}, not Proposed Deletion. The latter is for main namespace and takes 5 days. The former is quicker.
  • Use [[Tommy Tenny]] not [[Tommy_Tenny]] for links. The underscore shows up in the URL but is not needed on the wikipages.
  • Film template: {{Film|class=Start|importance=Low}}
  • Novel template: {{Novels|class=Stub|importance=Low}}
  • Biography project: {{WPBiography|class=Start|priority=Low|core=no}}
  • Disambiguation autotag: {{otheruses}}
  • The name trick, {{BASEPAGENAME}}
  • Contributions trick, [[Special:Contributions/{{BASEPAGENAME}}|contributions]]
  • {{GAnominee|[[2006-12-25]]}}
  • Footnote needed: {{verify source}}
  • Footnote form: <ref name="test1">[http://www.qqwxyz.com external link here.] Further explanation here.</ref>
  • Footnote ibid: <ref name="test1"/>
  • Footnotes section at bottom: <references/>
  • "Prodding," or nominating for deletion for cause: {{subst:prod|reason}} to the top of the main article page, and {{subst:PRODWarning|Article title}} ~~~~ on the author's page.
  • <blockquote> and </blockquote>
  • {simplify}
  • Priorities Table:
urgent
not
urgent
important
1
2
not
important
3
4

Copyright problems with Image:Bridge jesus.GIF[edit]

An image that you uploaded, Image:Bridge jesus.GIF, has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sixtrojans 03:57, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Replying to your comments on my talk page here: the image you recreated is substantially the same as what appears on the Web site you referenced. Just because you used a graphic design program to recreate it does not give you the right to release it into the public domain. You may want to consult with an intellectual property attorney before you pursue this matter. --Sixtrojans 16:19, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It definitely isn't a PD, but it may be Fair use. So currently, you are wrong. Cbrown1023 talk 21:53, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Do not delete comments from your talk page![edit]

  • It is against Wikipedia policy to remove comments from your talk page.--Sixtrojans 16:31, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • SECOND WARNING: Do not delete comments from your talk page. --Sixtrojans 15:06, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    • Technically, it is not against policy to remove comments from your talk page, although it is is greatly frowned-upon. Cbrown1023 talk 21:56, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thank you for attempting to make Wikipedia a better site. I am however concerned that a number of your edits to the Four Spiritual Laws article do not follow Wikipedia policies and guidelines. I would recommend you review the following articles before making additional contributions:

These policies and guidelines were established to ensure the integrity of Wikipedia as a reliable encyclopedia. --Sixtrojans 16:44, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

NFL Playoffs: request new review for GA[edit]

I noticed you made the last Good Article review. I have made the requested changes. Could you re-review it and see what you think? --Jayron32 00:24, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Service flag GA failed[edit]

I have failed service flag as a GAC at this time for the reasons described on its talk page. If you have any questions, please contact me on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. --Nehrams2020 07:58, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cleanup of Schuerman[edit]

In case you're wondering: I am cleaning up surname pages that got created by a now banned wikipedian. One of your surname pages (Schuerman) followed the exact same bad pattern, therefore I cleaned it up as well (per WP:SU). Since you didn't provide any people with the exact same spelling of the surname, cleaning up your page meant merging useful content into Schürmann and putting all other redirects up for speedy deletion. – sgeureka t•c 09:00, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Facing the Giants Good Article review[edit]

An article you have contribute to Facing the Giants has been nominated for WP:GA/R. You are welcome to contribute to the discussion concerning the article's GA status there. Drewcifer 04:00, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Facing the giants.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Facing the giants.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:27, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Facing the giants2.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Facing the giants2.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:27, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Facing the giants3.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Facing the giants3.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:28, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Flywheel poster.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Flywheel poster.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:44, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:OneNightWithTheKing.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:OneNightWithTheKing.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 16:47, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Flywheel (film)[edit]

The article Flywheel (film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No reliable sources, assertion of notability or any mainstream coverage. Self-promotional

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SuaveArt (talk) 01:01, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Flywheel (film)[edit]

I have nominated Flywheel (film), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flywheel (film). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. SuaveArt (talk) 04:13, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Facing the giants2.jpg[edit]

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Facing the giants2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:59, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Facing the giants3.jpg[edit]

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Facing the giants3.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:50, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Kghusker&oldid=1083926285"