User talk:Kenixkil

March 2012[edit]

Before adding a category to an article, please make sure that the subject of the article really belongs in the category that you specified according to Wikipedia's categorization guidelines. Categories must also be supported by the article's verifiable content. Categories may be removed if they are deemed incorrect for the subject matter. Thank you. Siawase (talk) 12:01, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Siawase (talk) 12:01, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Doll edits[edit]

Re: the see also entries, see the WP:SEEALSO guidelines, in particular: "As a general rule the "See also" section should not repeat links which appear in the article's body or its navigation boxes." Also, the Dollfie brand is really no more relevant to the Ball-jointed doll article than any other 1:6 fashion doll (aside from the brand name confusion, which is explained in the prose.) So there's no need to give it weight as if it was.

Re: the link to the Dollfie article, I generally try to keep the number of links in the lead section down to only the most important and weighty things, to not overwhelm readers. The lead tends to be very information dense as is. Also, your edits seem to have a general goal of increasing visibility of the Dollfie brand, something which goes against Wikipedia's policies on Neutral point of view and Promotion. Hope that clears things up. Siawase (talk) 17:46, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Questor Tapes[edit]

Hello, Kenixkil. You have new messages at Spinningspark's talk page.
Message added 15:14, 29 April 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Second warning[edit]

You again added items to "See also" at Psychology already linked in the article. Please stop. Consider this a warning. Sundayclose (talk) 02:02, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Devil Wears Prada characters[edit]

While I have no problem with you restoring those articles so the links lead somewhere, I should warn you that, as bold as doing so was, it still might be interpreted as going against consensus (to the extent that it exists for those articles). I'm not even sure either of them would survive a deletion !vote ... they're just characters in one book and one movie. Daniel Case (talk) 02:26, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

June 2015[edit]

Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Papi (The L Word character) does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Neelix (talk) 19:35, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Papi (The L Word character). Your edits have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Sundayclose (talk) 00:00, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Veteran (short story)[edit]

I'm not sure if anyone spoke with you in detail but I made the page back into a redirect at the AFD. The general criteria at Wikipedia:Notability (books) (more generally at Wikipedia:Notability (fiction)) is that the story itself must have reliable third-party discussions about it. The fact that other short stories exist or that other works of Forsyth exists isn't the issue. Even all of Forsyth's books don't have articles (such as The Biafra Story) so the single short story instead redirects to The Veteran (short story collection), the collection of stories where there are reviews of the entire collection as a whole. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 01:32, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

November 2021[edit]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from one or more pages into another page. While you are welcome to re-use the content of Wikipedia, here or elsewhere, our licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please either provide attribution in this case, or identify the source article so that someone else can do it. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Please be aware that editors who repeatedly copy content without attribution risk being blocked from editing. Thank you. Rastinition (talk) 20:42, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 7[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of scale model sizes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 1:1. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 14[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited IA, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Internal affairs.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:08, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]