User talk:Kaiseredit

Hi Jingiby,

Where can I talk to you or message you. Do you have email?

Minor[edit]

Please read wp:minor, you have marked many edits as minor that were not.Slatersteven (talk) 13:30, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

SPA[edit]

I also feel wp:spa might be worth a read.Slatersteven (talk) 13:31, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (October 9)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Eagleash was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Bulgaria national football team instead.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Not certain what this meant to be. It appears that the existing article has been copied to the sandbox and then bizarrely submitted for review.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Kaiseredit/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Kaiseredit/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Eagleash (talk) 19:04, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kaiseredit! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Eagleash (talk) 19:04, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

November 2020[edit]

Hello, Kaiseredit, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia. Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. Jingiby (talk) 18:16, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:Kaiseredit/sandbox[edit]

Hello, Kaiseredit. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:15, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 21[edit]

I feel like you might need to read this WP:NOTDUMB.Slatersteven (talk) 15:47, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2022[edit]

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits while logged out. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of both an account and an IP address by the same person in the same setting and doing so may result in your account being blocked from editing. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. CaptainEek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 21:18, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DS alert[edit]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in the Balkans or Eastern Europe. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

While the boilerplate alert notes there have been no problems, I in fact do find problems in your editing. Your recent edits in the Balkans topic area have not been up to par. You seem to have repeatedly been changing pages related to Bulgaria with no sources. You seem to be on a campaign to make Bulgaria's contributions seem grander or more important. If that does not stop, you will find yourself banned from editing about such topics altogether. CaptainEek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 21:26, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 2022[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Jingiby (talk) 16:52, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Jingiby (talk) 16:59, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, you may be blocked from editing. Jingiby (talk) 17:00, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 7[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Vika Jigulina, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Bulgarian and Russian. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:48, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023[edit]

Hello. Some of your recent genre changes have conflicted with our neutral point of view and/or verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you seek consensus for certain edits by discussing the matter on the article's talk page. Thank you. Jingiby (talk) 08:53, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Jingiby (talk) 06:40, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, you may be blocked from editing. Theonewithreason (talk) 07:37, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Slatersteven (talk) 11:27, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note as well that wp:3rr is not a right, you can be edit warring if you do not break it. If you revert again over at List of wars involving Bulgaria I will report you. Slatersteven (talk) 12:59, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 7[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of wars involving Bulgaria, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Withdrawal of U.S. troops from Iraq.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Stop edit warring=[edit]

This is your last warning, if you reverted again over at the list of wars involving Bulgaria I will report you, as I said 3rr is not a right, and you are edit warring, stop. Slatersteven (talk) 10:13, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ANI[edit]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Slatersteven (talk) 16:01, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 2023[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, you may be blocked from editing. Theonewithreason (talk) 05:07, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sep 23[edit]

Stop with the dishonest edit summaries and POVshing. Slatersteven (talk) 18:30, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Also read WP:NOTDUMB. Slatersteven (talk) 10:28, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]