User talk:Jule Firework

Julian augustine alexander, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Julian augustine alexander! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Doctree (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:16, 28 March 2013 (UTC)

Caccrop

I have blocked Caccrop for 24 hours for persistent vandalism, much of which was on your user page. Please feel welcome to contact me on my talk page if the trouble continues after the block has expired.

Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Caccrop has been deleted as an "attack page". I don't agree with the reason given for deletion, as I am sure you meant it as a constructive way of dealing with a disruptive editor, not as an attack. However, for future reference, the place to report persistent vandals is Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism, commonly abbreviated to WP:AIV. A "Long-term abuse" page is for very special situations. JamesBWatson (talk) 20:38, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

Oh ok. thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Julian augustine alexander (talk • contribs) 06:10, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

Developments

Caccrop is autoconfirmed so your user talk would have to be fully protected to keep them from editing your page. Full protection would mean that only admins would be able to edit your user talk. That would even prevent you from editing your own talk. Not really a solution, I think you'd agree. I've left Caccrop a message since JamesBWatson hasn't been around since this morning. JBW may find the need to re-block Caccrop, but I will leave that up to him. If Caccrop acts outside the bounds of policy again I will act. If you need explanation or clarification on any of this, post your message here; I'm watching this page now. Regards Tiderolls 21:10, 6 April 2013 (UTC)

Ohhhhh...Yea I wouldn't want to be prevented from editing my own talk page. It would also prevent other fello editors from communicating with me. Thanks! Regards Jule Firework

Developments, part II

Well, Caccrop saw fit to flaunt policy and convention so they are now blocked indefinitely. "Indefinitely" does not necessarily mean permanent, but they will have to make a very convincing case to be unblocked. I will leave your talk page on my watchlist in the event they return to their disruption here. As always, ask questions if need clarification. Regards Tiderolls 22:20, 6 April 2013 (UTC)

Thanks

January 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of best-selling singles in the United States may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "<>"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• 14-2013-songs-psy-gallops-221740402.html|title=Week Ending April 14, 2013. Songs: PSY Gallops Back]|date=2013-04-17}}</ref>
• |style="text-align: center;"| 4,410,000name="top102013">{{cite web |url=http://music.yahoo.com/blogs/music-news/chart-watch-top-10-albums-songs-2013-

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:01, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Stan (fan) may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• * "KatyCats" – [[Katy Perry]]<ref name=hollywoodtake>{{cite web|title=Katy Perry, Madonna art project amazing!|url=http://www.hollywoodtake.com/katy-perry-

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:13, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm IndianBio. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Prism (Katy Perry album), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. —Indian:BIO · ^{[ ChitChat ]} 15:29, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC)