User talk:JudeB5

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Conveying User About False Article Edit[edit]

Wikipedia has certain regulations to follow which I respect as an editor but whatever you are trying to do as an editor is defamatory to me and my content handling which can lead to your ban from Wikipedia and I didn't felt it in that way about it until you flipped all false allegation which in actual case you did as an editor starting from invading a stable article, not only changing it totally according to your preference but handling it as an owner, personal attacking by questioning a community's historical presence of people despite provided references attaching your references as only truth, making unrequired fallacy theory out of it.


As a responsible editor i didn't started edit warring it was you from start who came with a book reference, oneself not mentioning exact page number and citation but questioning and forcing other to do it. Whatever you did to this article is wrong and will be wrong, this will promote wrong caste knowledge sharing through your article edit to mass users of Wikipedia even if it takes restrictive actions against me as an editor.

TheJeSUSTICE108 (talk) 19:59, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@TheJeSUSTICE108 just cite a WP:RS for your claim. Any unsourced claim will be considered as ORIGINAL RESEARCH. JudeB5 (talk) 19:01, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet[edit]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Nobita456 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Nobita456. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 09:16, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]