Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sirdog was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of websites). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
The comment the reviewer left was:
What is desperately needed for this article are independent reliable sources that give it significant coverage. None of the sources currently present indicate whether that it warrants inclusion on Wikipedia. Also, please turn your sources into citation - see Help:Referencing for beginners for assistance with this. Feel free to reach out to me or the Teahouse for help.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:C-Net 12.0 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Hello, Jimmyzeet!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! —Sirdog(talk) 03:16, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Sirdog, thank you for you feedback on the article (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:C-Net_12.0). My inspiration for creating this page was that there was next to nothing on the internet available about this software that I and many others remember so fondly. Therefore, I was not able to find many references that refer to this topic directly. I did however find a lot of sources that I thought would be sufficient.
Looking at this page (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C-Net_DS2) which is another C-Net version from the same era, it has no cited sources whatsoever. So looking at my page, where I found several and cited them properly (I thought), I thought I was in much better shape than the page on DS-2. Do you have any advice for me? Should I remove the sources and only leave the official manual? Keep in mind that this was from 1987 so not a lot of out there. Which is why I wanted this page.
Thanks for your time and for any advice you could give me.
