User talk:Jimmygotyback
Jimmygotyback, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]
|
Hi Jimmygotyback! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:02, 18 June 2016 (UTC) |
Regarding your edits to this article, I think it is best to discuss the contested content on the article's talk page, Talk:Exit Calm, rather than "edit warring" back and forth. Thank you. Deli nk (talk) 17:44, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
Whilst it may take 2 to edit war - I am not the editor removing referenced information just because I don't like it. There's no justification for removing it - and it's up the other editor to justify removing referenced content.
January 2017[edit]
Your recent editing history at Exit Calm shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:39, 27 January 2017 (UTC)