User talk:JemmaBrossel

April 2008[edit]

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Existence of God. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Woland (talk) 19:31, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Richard Dawkins. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 19:44, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to God. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 19:54, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of GOD is good[edit]

A tag has been placed on GOD is good requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later." You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. RichardΩ6 12 19:56, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Advocacy[edit]

Please stop trying to push your own point of view on Wikipedia. Wikipedia has policies against biased articles or articles which 'push' one side of an argument, such as that about the existence of God. ><RichardΩ6 12 19:59, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to User:Richard0612, you will be blocked from editing. Please stop trying to push your point of view or you will be blocked. RichardΩ6 12 20:03, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked[edit]

I understand that you feel strongly about your position and your religion, and I hope that you're happy for that, but you must understand that Wikipedia is not a place to proselytize or attack people like this -- it's a collaborative encyclopedia. I've currently blocked you from editing for 24 hours; please use this time to review our welcome page and our community portal to learn more about contributing to Wikipedia. Thank you for your time. – Luna Santin (talk) 20:18, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Abuse of Deletion Processes[edit]

Your recent participation at RFD ([1] & [2]) and your MFD nomination seem to be retaliatory for the warnings and block given above. Such actions are disruptive. Continuing in such a fashion is likely to get you blocked again. I suggest you take some time to become more familiar with our policies and procedures. If you wish to participate here, you must do so within them. A good starting point is Wikipedia:Five pillars. -- JLaTondre (talk) 21:34, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I closed one MfD, even though I lack the mop, and Hu12 closed the other. This user is being pointy and is likely to be blocked if that continues. Also, I find it odd that despite this user having only 21 contributions, and having been on Wikipedia for only two days, they've dived in to the MfD process already. Coldmachine^Talk 22:01, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Jesus is Almighty GOD[edit]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Jesus is Almighty GOD, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/jesus_is_almighty_god.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 22:02, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked[edit]

Due to your constant disruption, vandalism, point-of-view pushing, etc., you have been blocked from Wikipedia indefinitely.¤~Persian Poet Gal ^(talk) 22:09, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Db-userreq[edit]

I have denied the request for speedy deletion. You may blank or archive your talk page if you so desire, but the history of the page should be preserved. Besides, you've been indefinitely blocked, so it doesn't really matter. VanTucky 00:05, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]