User talk:Jeff G./Archives/2010/February
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
About your Admin Coaching request
|
Your submission at Admin Coaching has been removed from the request list, as requests where the submitter has not visited the page for at least 6 months (or been inactive for at least 4 months) are removed. You are welcome to re-submit a request should you wish to, but please note that you are expected to regularly check the page (and to update the "last visited" field of your request) to show your continued interest in the project. If you do re-submit, please carefully re-read the instructions for submission as they may have changed since you last visited! As noted on the project page, there is an on-going backlog with the project, as so few admins are currently coaching. This means that you may have a long wait for a response (if you receive one at all). If you no longer require admin coaching, I hope that you continue to enjoy editing Wikipedia! Regards, -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 08:23, 29 January 2010 (UTC) |
- Thanks, I have restored it. I also moved the comment "<!-- User:Phantomsteve/adco-removed -->" so as not to interfere with section editing. — Jeff G. ツ 04:57, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
Jeff, I wrote the Windows_Master_Control_Panel_shortcut article, and reverted an edit as I felt it was removing truth. You've undone that without discussion, and I have replaced it again. Rather than developing into an edit war, please discuss first. I've read many of these blogs, and linked to a number of them. It is a verifiable fact that they were repeating the same content without attribution. So why should that fact be removed from the wiki? I've kept the article as factual as possible, and provided numerous references. There was at least one prolific professional writer (and many popular bloggers) who didn't attribute. I've avoided naming specific writers/blogs in the interests of diplomacy, but anyone can follow the links and google a little to verify this.Hbachus (talk) 21:45, 18 February 2010 (UTC) - Harry
- Thanks for the clarification. Please note that your first reversion was the first edit from 86.182.164.171. — Jeff G. ツ 02:05, 19 February 2010 (UTC)