User talk:Jd123

Welcome!

Hello, Jd123, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! TMS63112 22:20, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Eastbourne College[edit]

I have had a go at tidying this article for you Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! ^(Whisper?) 17:14, 23 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

University College London Law Faculty[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your work on the University College London Law Faculty article. Unfortunately I have had to remove a large section of it (the section on Research Institutes and Centres) as it appears to have been taken straight from the department's website and is therefore a copyright violation. If you have permission to use this content, please can you make this clear. Otherwise, perhaps you may like to rewrite this article section in your own words. For more information, see WP:COPYVIO. Thanks. ^Tom _Phil 16:47, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Davis Contractors Ltd. v. Fareham U.D.C. (1956)[edit]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Davis Contractors Ltd. v. Fareham U.D.C. (1956), and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.duhaime.org/LegalResources/Contracts/tabid/339/articleType/ArticleView/articleId/91/Default.aspx. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot 19:28, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]