User talk:Jcalavitta
Can you help make the factual contribution more notable rather than deleting? Please be more helpful: there are many notable sources on this topic, why are you blocking these facts?
I have an user removing important notable facts that are sources with major news sources, can someone help?
Hi, looking at some of your edits, they look more like *opinion*, rather than fact. As an example, if someone says that black actors earn less on average in 2021 for similar roles compared to white actors, that could be verified as a fact (I haven't checked, just making up an example). A link saying that Walter White get favourable empathy because he is white, or that Worf is portrayed according to racial stereotypes isn't *factual*, even if the link is verifiable. Not sure if that makes sense, and I am not saying whether what you are putting up should or should not be there, but there are guidelines around what should/shouldn't be placed on a page, and [link] to the dispute process might help. Heywoodg talk 17:07, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
- WIKI calls for neutral and diverse variety of views, and I feel like you are de-limiting facts and views, and since these are views from POC authors, writers, and thinkers, I think this is a major silencing of basic facts from verifiable sources. Jcalavitta (talk) 22:49, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
- Also, it seems like you are systematically taking down my classroom and students contributions, is this true? Jcalavitta (talk) 22:50, 11 March 2022 (UTC)