User talk:Jat1321

May 2022[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; however, please remember the essential rule of respecting copyrights. Edits to Wikipedia, such as your edit to the page Khizr Khan, may not contain material from copyrighted sources unless used with permission. It is almost never okay to copy extensive text out of a book or website and paste it into a Wikipedia article with little or no alteration, though you can clearly and briefly quote copyrighted text in the right circumstances. Content that does not comply with this legal rule must be removed. For more information on this, see:

If you still have questions, there is the Teahouse, or you can click here to ask a question on your talk page and someone will be along to answer it shortly. As you get started, you may find the pages below to be helpful.

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! — Diannaa (talk) 21:01, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for informing, I will make alterations and cite the source Jat1321 (talk) 14:19, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Firoz Shah Tughlaq. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Packer&Tracker (talk) 14:09, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Saadullah Khan (Mughal Empire), did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Packer&Tracker (talk) 15:35, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Khokhar. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. please don't edit war, the dynasty is a Sayyid dynasty, the possibilities to the background has been shared on the dynasty page. There is no reason to add this dynasty on Khokhar based on Eaton, most other writers don't say the same. Akalanka820 (talk) 11:40, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Akalanka820 Go argue with Digby or Eaton

I only cited their books Jat1321 (talk) 12:05, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

there are various such references. As we can see Eaton's point is already added on main dynasty page. You cannot use that to add it everywhere, when there are lots of contrary references to it. Here- :

The first of these two dynasties was founded by Khizr Khan, who bore the appellation 'Sayyid', which identified him as a descendant of prophet Muhammad, so the dynasty he founded came to be known as the Sayyid dynasty. The veracity of Khizr Khan's claimed lineage is uncertain, but it is likely that his forebears were Arabs, who had migrated to India in the early Tughluq period and settled in Multan. The family prospered in India, gaining wealth and power. This advancement culminated in Malik Suleiman, Khizr Khan's father, becoming the governor of Multan under the Tughluqs. When Suleiman died, Khizr Khan succeeded him to the post, but lost it during the political turmoil following the death of Firuz Tughluq.^[1]

and many such references. Akalanka820 (talk) 12:05, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

now please stop adding stuffs which look like pov. A writer took a different stand than others doesn't mean you can use it on all pages to push it. The points of Eaton are added on main dynasty page. Thanks Akalanka820 (talk) 12:09, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Akalanka820 Sure, Thanks Jat1321 (talk) 12:15, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Important Notice[edit]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Packer&Tracker (talk) 12:33, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022[edit]

It may not have been your intention, but one of your edits may have been a change that some consider controversial. Due to this, your edits may have been reverted. When making possibly controversial changes, it is good practice to first discuss your edit on the article's talk page before making it, to gain consensus over whether or not to include the text, phrasing, etc. If you believe that the information you added was correct, please initiate that discussion. PS:- The author you cited was a Civil servant in Raj era, apart from being obviously dated/archaic, it's not a WP:HISTRS to push for such absurd claims. ∆ P&t ♀√ (talk) 04:47, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I have reverted your edit on Khokhar page, you added it even after explaining you the counter viewpoint to it here- [[1]], only Eaton and Digby took a different line, other writers aren't saying the same. Please, stop pushing a particular pov based on just 2 writers contrary to what it has been on the main Sayyid Dynasty page. Akalanka820 (talk) 07:47, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing information based on the way you view topics[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Gujarat Sultanate. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. You removed information that was properly cited based on the way you view the topic. At least three sources were given from recognized authors, you removed them. GujaratiHistoryinDNA (talk) 19:11, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@GujaratiHistoryinDNA I believe you have left the message on the wrong page because I have not removed anything from that page

Thanks and Regards Jat1321 (talk) 19:14, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

^ Eraly, Abraham (2015-04-01). The Age of Wrath: A History of the Delhi Sultanate. Penguin UK. ISBN 978-93-5118-658-8.

[1] Eraly, Abraham (2015-04-01). The Age of Wrath: A History of the Delhi Sultanate. Penguin UK. ISBN 978-93-5118-658-8.

[1]