User talk:Jackqbox

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Information icon Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Mean as custard (talk) 06:53, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

August 2016[edit]

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Tongxiao, Miaoli. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Cahk (talk) 07:47, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you insert a spam link. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. Cahk (talk) 07:50, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for adding spam links. Persistent spammers will have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia and potentially penalized by search engines. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  BethNaught (talk) 10:29, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jackqbox (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Hy BethNaught It is not my intention to create spawn, nor advertise, nor have any commercial intention The side is basically only an help for my daughter , and have added the map feature using the mysql database by an additional mediawiki extension in one of my servers I was under the impression that the data ( by the php script links) was adding real value to wikipedia as this data is in most cases fully missing in wikipedia nor wikipedia has the advantage of this graphical map info.

Presently i was adding an function that would guide people directly to (existing or create new) school pages in wikipedia as i am not an vehicle to create and maintain a public school information wiki ^_^

But apparently you have another opinion, but that can happen in life.

Perhaps it is an good idea to check with your colleagues if on the other hand the method that i am using to present the MAP info would be an good standard internal mediawiki extension addition inside wikipedia as the user interface is much more appropriate to gain (wikipedia) access to desired info in this case

regards

Decline reason:

You have added links to your personal website to about a hundred articles. That's linkspam. Huon (talk) 22:14, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jackqbox (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Sorry ^_^ about my enthusiasm to add indeed for some of the city's in taiwan the selective educational data that belongs to that city as that was missing fully in those pages. As you can see that the link https://qbox4u.com:8081/conf/abc/mwk/index.php?title=Taiwan_School_and_Buxiban_(Cram)_List consist at the end of an &sel=city&nam= ....... This triggers the database to select the data that belongs to the appropriate city and is maintained in an single place (MySQL table) The biggest problem wikipedia has regarding this subject, is that i already discovered that quite a big number of people are trying to do the same job by adding on an stochastic base schools in different pages without any correlation to each other nor that the data is correctly updated nor that there seems to be some lacking (mediawiki required) structure in the city pages. Updating the Wikipedia pages manually would be considering the amount of cities and schools an full time job, don't even mention my idea to expand this feature in an simple way to other countries ( multiply the affected page data by xxxx your best guess ^_^ ) Again, it is an hobby from me to expand and use the features of mediawiki as this free application is an perfect php platform with an magnificent easy user interface both for users and people that would make their own internal functions.... Back to your remark... linkspam yep, i added links, as the data is missing and wikipedia has no automated method to provide mysql==>school_data data sets, nor the required php extension functionality for that Adding the links is at this moment for me the only possible method to maintain correct information as adding missing school data is NOT inappropriate or you have another idea

An solution for your dilemma for external wikipedia links could easily be solved by making an mediawiki extension that would absorb the external data and inject it into the wikipedia page itself (meaning you are in control ^_^)

example

/******************
 *  This php function is an qbox4u.com utiity
 *  Copyright (C) 2010 qbox4u.com <qbox4u@gmail.com>  
 *
 *  This program is free software therefore you can redistribute 
 *  it and/or modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License 
 *  as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the 
 *  License, or (at your option) any later version.
 *
 *  Please consult and/or request the administrator of qbox4u@gmail.com
 *  to use the information and samples 
 * 
 *  You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License along
 *  with this program; if not, write to the Free Software Foundation, Inc.,
 *  59 Temple Place - Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307, USA.
 *  http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/gpl.html
 */
function grab($page_id){
	  
		// Extract from an external URL the data
		$ch = curl_init("https://www.Jackqbox.his.url/xxx page id xxxxx");
	  	// set appropriate https options
		curl_setopt($ch, CURLOPT_VERBOSE, true);
		curl_setopt($ch, CURLOPT_RETURNTRANSFER, true);
		curl_setopt($ch, CURLOPT_SSL_VERIFYPEER, FALSE);     
		curl_setopt($ch, CURLOPT_SSL_VERIFYHOST, 2); 
		// grab URL and pass it to the variabele $page
		$page = curl_exec($ch);
		// close cURL resource, and free up system resources
		curl_close($ch)
                etc etc etc

Decline reason:

Technical decline, unblock accepted below. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:30, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I think you misunderstand at least part of the problem. Your website, by Wikipedia's standards, is not a reliable source. Wikipedia should not link to it; much less should the MediaWiki software be modified to directly import data from someone else's database beyond the Wikimedia Foundation's control. Huon (talk) 00:09, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Jackqbox (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Thanks for the last info you gave Huon It is now crystal clear for me that as we are not an reliable source, no direct linking is possible
I will refrain myselves in the future to do so and will check if other page owners are willing to do the hard labour by updating manually an huge number of pages with the missing related data . ps: The source of a data where the origin lies will also be identified to assure reliability and continuity for others Perhaps it is possible for you therefore to unlock the account again?

Accept reason:

As you have agreed to stop linking to your site, I have unblocked your account. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:28, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]