User talk:J.delanoy/Archive 8

Archive 5

Archive 6

Archive 7

Archive 8

Archive 9

Archive 10

→

Archive 15

---

August 1, 2008 — August 31, 2008

Have a Coffee

- Sorf^ane has given you a cup of coffee, for that quite amusing series of edits earlier on my talkpage earlier. Hoperfully this will wake you up a bit ;)
Coffee somehow promotes WikiLove and hopefully this has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a coffee, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or someone putting up with some stick at this time. Enjoy!

Spread the lovely, warm, bitter goodness of coffee by adding {{subst:WikiCoffee}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Header added

then who is the one who decides what information is right and what information is wrong. Can the people that write this info prove without a shadow of a doubt that their information is correct? If I'm not the only one who feels this way then there must be a method to my madness. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.255.174.115 (talk) 03:12, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

so if i were to create a page called kosovo is serbia, but maintain a neutral stance and give plenty of sources to back it up, would the page still stand? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.255.174.115 (talk) 03:32, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

Query on block

Did you really levy an indef block on Deevee337 (talk · contribs)? That seams awfully harsh considering this editor never received a single warning. --Kralizec! (talk) 04:52, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

Well, indef blocking without a warning definitely isn't policy. However, I highly doubt the said user would have ever done anything constructive. The vandalism was very blatant, and clearly in bad faith. Landon1980 (talk) 05:03, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

• I'd have done the same, and the editor did receive a warning. Given their edits, it was clear that they had no intention of contributing constructively, and blocking as a vandal only account was the appropriate thing to do (I think so anyway). Steve Crossin (talk) (contact page) 05:06, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

They didn't edit after the warning though. Only because they were blocked in my opinion. Landon1980 (talk) 05:09, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

I would be perfectly fine with the block if the editor had received even a single level-4im warning. However the fact is that this editor got absolutely nothing from the community except an after-the-fact warning that was immediately followed by a block notice. Where is the AGF in that? --Kralizec! (talk) 05:12, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

• True, however as AGF says, "Unless there is strong evidence to the contrary, assume that people who work on the project are trying to help it, not hurt it.". I'd say that their contributions indicate that they had no intention of contributing constructively. Assume good faith unless there's evidence to the contrary. I am all for assuming good faith, even stretching it at times, but this seems a clear circumstance of a vandal only account. Steve Crossin (talk) (contact page) 05:25, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

Just a note: I am sorry for bowing out of this, but I have to be at work in 6 and a half hours, so I really need to get some sleep. Kralizec!, if you really want to unblock him, I will not consider it wheel warring, but all of the vandalisms the user makes if/when he is unblocked will be on your head. J.delanoy^gabs_adds 05:35, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

When it comes to fellow admins, I generally follow a 0RR policy, so your invitation to bring the consequences of an unblock upon "my own head" are quite unnecessary. From my perspective, this looks like an out-of-process block because the editor got zero warnings before being indefinitely blocked. WP:BLOCK states that "before a block is imposed, efforts should be made to educate the user about our policies and guidelines, and to warn them when their behaviour conflicts with our policies and guidelines" ... but that did not happen here. --Kralizec! (talk) 06:30, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the apology note, I very much appreciate it. This just re-confirms exactly what I said about you in your RfA, and I really wish that more admins could do what you did and step back to re-assess the situation rather than get defensive and emotionally involved. I would also like to apologize if you felt I was harping on you too much, and in retrospect I recognize that I should have issued this editor a {{uw-vandalism4im}} warning rather than the level one warning I gave. As I said to Landon1980 on my talk page [1], I honestly believe that the AIV process works very smoothly and without unnecessary drama when we are all operating on the same wavelength. In the case of Deevee337, what is done is done and I do not feel it is worth going back to change the block. While I will not presume to interpret the official blocking policy for you, I can say that I am always extremely hesitant to block editors who have not been sufficiently warned. Perhaps I was spoiled by your gazillions of well executed AIV reports, but blocking is serious and all AIV reports should be held up to the same high standard. --Kralizec! (talk) 18:35, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

Do not get me wrong, I block certain sock masters on sight, and likewise I do not hesitate to block spammers or editors on a heavy vandalism spree. However I always make sure to dot my i's and cross my t's for everything else. If vandal fighters are correctly following policy, editors may be blocked in as little as four or five vandalism edits (or two if they are extremely blatant), so the potential gain of doing an early but out-of-process block is not worth the pain (drama and endless whinging on AN/I) if the vandal were to request an unblock on procedural grounds. (Sorry my replies are coming so long after yours ... I am at work and cannot give wiki my undivided attention.) --Kralizec! (talk) 18:53, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

Your RfA

Sorry I'm late, but congratulations on your successful RfA! I'm pleased to have been a part of it. Cosmic Latte (talk) 19:06, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

Yes! Congratulations!--Xp54321 ^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 19:08, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

Same here. - Diligent Terrier (and friends) 19:28, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

Help

Hi J.: Some children are running wild this evening. If you're around, please check the vandalism noticeboard. Thanks, JNW (talk) 05:44, 2 August 2008 (UTC)

Thanks. I saw that you had been active recently, so I was hoping you were still checking in. Cheers, JNW (talk) 05:48, 2 August 2008 (UTC)

SF3 needs to ask you something!!

Hello, J. I just logged into Huggle and was on it for less than 5 minutes until it encountered that annoying pop-up window with options like "Send Error Report" and "Don't Send". I closed out, and then tried to log back in, but it says this: "Huggle is not enabled for your account, check configuration subpage." (And I've had this program for about three weeks) What does that mean? If you could look at my Huggle.css, can you tell me what my problem is? I've decided to ask this on your talk page because you're the user who helped me get Huggle. Thanks, SchfiftyThree 16:34, 2 August 2008 (UTC)

Hello, J.delanoy. You have new messages at SchfiftyThree's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hello... I was wondering if you could help...?

Hi. I think someone has hacked into my wi-fi. Anyway, occasionally I make anonymous edit's to wikipedia. I just ent to do one of those now but my account was blocked. I also just noted activity on my wi-fi other than me. I was wondering if you could unblock my I.P. now i've changed my WEP key. (To note, i made it WPA so it cant be hacked =) Thanks Mczack26 (talk) 16:51, 2 August 2008 (UTC)

AIV

Just wanted to say it's nice to check my watchlist and find an AIV edit summary that says, "...blocked 1 day by J.delanoy".

Hell yeah. Kafziel ^{Complaint Department} 20:18, 2 August 2008 (UTC)

Thanks. It's still a bit surreal for me. I look at my watchlist and I'm like, "Holy crap, those bots are talking about me!!!" J.delanoy^gabs_adds 20:20, 2 August 2008 (UTC)

My thanks!

		The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
		For your assistance in blockin 'dem vandals, I award you this barnstar. I appreciate a fast-reflexed admin. Thanks again. --eric (mailbox) 23:28, 2 August 2008 (UTC)

Hello Again

Perhaps you can help me out. I might have a potential move-vandalism and general vandalism problem. BeerBelly82, TitleRanch903, and BuffaloSam. The latter of the three left Wikipedia in December of 07 and came back yesterday. The others appear to be new accounts.

BeerBelly82 moved the Johnstown/Altoona Television Market template to Template:Johnstown/Altoona/State College TV, though I can find nothing to show "State College" is part of the official Nielsen "name" for that market. All of the pages that linked to the old template were then changed. TitleRanch903 appears to be following in this changing of old templates.

BuffaloSam has moved two radio market templates to "names" that don't appear to match the official Arbitron "name". This user also changed all of the pages that linked to the old template.

To me, this seems like move-vandalism and general vandalism. I could be wrong, but as Kubigula and Firsfron are out (the admins I bring stuff like this to), I bring it to your attention. Thanks...NeutralHomer ^T:C 01:35, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

I haven't, as I am not really sure what to ask. That's why I normally just let Kubigula or Firsfron handle these things (they appear to be off for the weekend). Do you have any ideas on what I should ask? Thanks :)....NeutralHomer ^T:C 03:53, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

No worries :) I ask Kubigula when he comes back and see what he thinks. Sometimes these edits are just good-faith goofs, sometimes not. That's why I ask an admin.

I will go think another tough question for ya (kidding!). Have a Great Weekend...NeutralHomer ^T:C 04:19, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

Re: Your subapges

Yes I would like that because my userpage has been vandalized before and I don't really want that to happen again. Thank you. Hmrox (talk) 03:39, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

Edit war taking place, can you do something?

Greetings, I just want to inform you that an edit war is currently taking place in the article: List of hollows in bleach; could you please step in )and solve this issue once and for all? Please act quickly, I am one of the peolpe involved in the edit war; please review our statements and help us to medite this situation. Thank you Cristian Cappiello (talk) 05:22, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

Maybe this would be more appropriate at Requests for Page Protection? IceUnshattered (talk) 17:27, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

Minjo brotherhood

I don't think either revision is any good on that page. check the whole page, it is a total mess. Might not be worth the bother to revert. Let's put it this way: if the IP were going from (rather than to) the edit they keep changing it too, we would probably be reverting that as blatant nonsense.  :) Protonk (talk) 03:08, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

Hey

I'm back from wikibreak. Delighted it all went well. Enjoy mopping. --Dweller (talk) 09:34, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for removing the vandalism from my page

Thanks for cleaning up the vandalism on my user page. Ajh16 (talk) 15:28, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

I was just asking something

I was just asking him something. Why did you treat it as personal attack?

Actually, your post here and there was a personal attack. Saying that users have no life and only use a "gay tool" is a personal attack. Erik the Red 2 (AVE·CAESAR) 15:42, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

Small furry animals

When dropping by on your user page after your block of Mister friendly i noticed an infobox on your main page that i would like to use on my own page (Hence the title of this subsection). Before simply copying and pasting it over, i would first like to ask if you have no objections on me doing so. In case it is, would you by any chance have a version around that does not contain an overload of HTML comments as vandalism protection? Of course its reversible, but well... :) Excirial ^{(Talk,Contribs)} 18:15, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

Heh, nope. If you want to demean yourself, by all means go ahead :-)

The non-html-commented version is (ironically) included in an html comment in this message. You may want to replace or remove the diffs I linked to.

Feel free to stealborrow anything you want from my userpage in the future without asking... Cheers! J.delanoy^gabs_adds 18:24, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for saving me from having to invest valuable hours of time to uncomment that box.

As for demeaning myself, well, don't they say that knowing oneself is the basis of all wisdom? No matter that, i changed the text a little notch, due to the much more pressing quote that says: "its better to shut up and make them think you are a fool, then to speak and remove all doubt". Sillyness aside, the infobox its just to fitting of what im doing (Both in old and new form) for me to just walk by :) Excirial ^{(Talk,Contribs)} 18:45, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

Don't think...

That just because you are an admin now, that you can just beat me to the reverts and all that jazz. I demand that you stop! ;0 KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 18:16, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

Pure wickedness you are! KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 18:21, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

Cowabunga

Aw, the turtle page is gone! I even looked up the youtube video that was part of the campaign :) Yeah, it was a crappy page, but it made me smile. For me, being non-american, wikipedia is an important source to understanding jokes in family guy; this "chicken, turkey" page might have elucidated an obscure joke. Oh well. Stijndon (talk) 19:14, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

Advice on "spam"

You recently deleted an article I posted on Salient Media. I read the section on Blatant advertising and don't understand how the article met that criteria. It's written in a neutral tone. It doesn't link to anything. It isn't an attempt to sell anything. Everything is factual. What can I change to have an article about Salient media on the wikipedia?

Thanks for your help, Erik —Preceding unsigned comment added by SalientMadsky (talk • contribs) 20:24, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

Jimmy Carter page

Please explain why you undid all of my content additions, enhanced references, and increased organization of the Jimmy Carter article. I am a journalist who has covered the Carters for several years. I believe the post-presidency section of the article could stand to be condensed, reorganized and better referenced. I was attempting to do that. None of my contributions were biased or vandalism. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ddwyer (talk • contribs) 20:43, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

I did reload the page and your changes were not undone. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ddwyer (talk • contribs) 20:48, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

Many thanks!

Thank you... ...for participating in my RfA, which closed with 119 in support, 4 neutral and 5 opposes. I'm honestly overwhelmed at the level of support that I've received from the community, and will do my best to maintain the trust placed in me. I 'm also thankful to those who opposed or expressed a neutral position, for providing clear rationales and superb feedback for me to build on. I've set up a space for you to provide any further feedback or thoughts, should you feel inclined to. However you voted, thanks for taking the time out to contribute to the process, it's much appreciated. Kind regards, Gazimoff 21:31, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the T shirt too!Gazimoff 21:31, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

Have a barnstar

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		For beating me to one trillion reverts tonight and completely ruining my evening. Nice work ;) - Toon05 22:59, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

Lol, excellent, I'll make the most of it. I'm sure my highly original barnstar will stand out on your page. Ahem. - Toon⁰⁵ 23:06, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

Jetsunma Ahkon Lhamo and User:Longchenpa

Hi appreciate your involvement here. What advice do you have for my dispute Talk:Jetsunma_Ahkon_Lhamo#WP:NPF_enforcement__relief now that User:Longchenpa is engaging in multiple reverts and Talk page section forking. Zulu Papa 5 (talk) 00:03, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

83.138.162.78

Hi. I'm not sure if I understand the block log,[2] but I would strongly suggest this IP is hardblocked. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 00:24, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for responding on my behalf. It is unfortunate that dynamic IPs can confuse some users. Let's hope s/he creates an account. κaτaʟaveno^T_C 01:56, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

P.S. Congrats on your adminship, BTW... I have seen you around WP for a long time and your dedication to the project is obvious. κaτaʟaveno^T_C 02:40, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

Template vandalism

Thanks for helping undo the vandalism at the John McCain article. Can we also protect the images? And, is protecting the images something that would be done at Wikipedia, or at Commons, or at both?

Incidentally, semi-protection is a definite improvement, but we may need full protection for both templates as well as images, by the time the election rolls around.Ferrylodge (talk) 02:35, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

Your message

This HTTP proxy can be used by changing your web browser settings. For Firefox, go to Tools > Options > Advanced > Network > Settings > Manual proxy configuration > Enter "170.210.215.253" next to "HTTP Proxy" and "3128" next to "Port" and save settings. If you can browse the net, you've got an open proxy. You can see your IP using Special:Mytalk. There should probably be a tutorial on this somewhere. Spellcast (talk) 04:15, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

Yeah your method has too many steps, so just stick to the one browser you prefer most. You don't have to use the IP to leave a block notice. If you can load one page, go ahead and block it. The most common ports I find are 80, 3128, 8080, and 8000. If you're determining what port an IP from the WP:OPD list is using, try googling the IP first. The easiest ones to test in that list are the "open proxy" types. The "exit server" and "anonymizer" IPs are harder to deal with. Spellcast (talk) 16:39, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

Yep, and it's a good idea to give the site in the block log in case the IP requests an unblock. Spellcast (talk) 16:14, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

My very first barnstar!

Thank you very much! --  Darth Mike  _{(Talk • Contribs)} 04:40, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

Robot

Are you a robot? Or an actual human contributor? I'm confused, you revert my friends USEFUL edits to stuff INSTANTLY. You also are quick to edit my images. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.244.78.68 (talk) 16:42, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

Proxy tagging

Hi J.delanoy. I'll just mention this, especially if you are making the IP's last edit, it really helps to note (I think preferably in the block log) how the proxy is accessible so that it can be checked in the future. We get a lot of unblock requests from open proxies, and it helps people dealing with the unblock request if they know what to check. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 17:43, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

Interstate 5 in California,...

...Interstate 80 in California, and U.S. Route 101 in California

I have no idea what's up with those fights either. You can ask somebody to take a look at it by WP:ANI. Splat5572 (talk · contribs) is the one who continues to fight over, when we say not to have Santa Ana, Golden State, Hollywood, Ventura, East/Bayshore Freeways on he exit list on I-5, I-80, and US 101. I'm tired of dealing with fights too. Splat5572 is soooo selfish, he doesn't care what other people thinks but himself.--Freewayguy ^{Call? Fish} 20:10, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

Joe on Drums - flickr photo

Hello.

You may use the photo, as I am assuming I would be credited. The easiest way is just for me to attach the photo on an email, does that work for you?

http://i36.tinypic.com/bfh0rm.jpg <-- is the photo you requested.

Thanks! Jules —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.147.62.137 (talk) 17:03, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

I'm testing!

Hi. I'm about to test rollback, because I'm curious what the edit summary says, but I can't do it in my own talk space because (I think) it would rollback too far, or maybe it wouldn't, but I'm afraid it would, so I'm going to leave a message here, and then I'm going to take it away! And then I'm going to look at the edit summary. So, that's what I'm up to. Hope all is well with you. :D --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 19:00, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

Test is done. It was kind of unexciting, actually. :/ I can see the point about it being polite to leave an honest to gosh edit summary when undoing somebody else's edits, but given the aura of grave severity around misuse of rollback, I kind of wondered if it was going to say, "U SUCK! I IZ REPORTING U!" It didn't. So...anticlimactic. Not that I 'm condoning reverting people without the politeness of an edit summary, mind you. Gosh, no. I'm all for civil! --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 19:02, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

Template:CostaRica-politician-stub

Hi. I added about 100 Costa Rican politician stubs the other night in Category:Costa Rican politicians. I took for granted the stub category didn't exist and just added CostRica-bio-stub but it does. Could you use AWB to quickly stub sort the stub categories of the articles. I aim to get some of them expanded in the coming weeks by translation ♦Blofeld of SPECTRE♦ ^$1,000,000? 20:53, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

Header truncated

Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#User:Sponge417

[3] Not really that funny, but it reminds me of the Citybest section. Someone writing out their credentials, as if they're real. Enigma ^message 22:38, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

Hey

How's it going? Last time I talked to you, you asked me if I could forward you Huggle ;)   jj137 (talk) 03:07, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

I know, it's crazy. The thing that caught my eye (in my watchlist) is, you're an admin now? Well, firstly congrats :) Unfortunately I guessed I missed your RFA in my random times of inactivity :(

I haven't really been up to much, really. I sometimes use Huggle, but like you said, it's a) a TON of people (pretty much everyone) use it now, b) less vandals, it seems like, and c) Huggle is about 5x a better tool than the "good old days". I guess it just makes it harder to actually find vandalism to revert... in March, every other click was vandalism and I could easily hit 20 edits per minute from reverting and warning. Or, maybe it's just me.   jj137 (talk) 03:24, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

Ha ha, that page is... odd. For one, I don't even see the point of putting private information somewhere where anyone can see it. (Well, it looks like they may be foreign and may not know things like that, but still...)

Yeah, it's surprising how much it comes in handy, mostly at random times. I guess you sort of get "used" to the buttons being there after a while. As for Huggle, well, I almost forgot that most of the vandalism came from schools (that would make sense). I'm guessing within a week or two it will increase. Also, if you want, you can delete one of my random user subpages and I'll "yell" at you. ;)   jj137 (talk) 04:09, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

Ha ha, that's pretty funny. As for the "deletion addiction", I wouldn't worry, I doubt there's an admin here that hasn't clicked the delete button on one of those pages at some point. :P (Yeah, it's that tempting...)   jj137 (talk) 04:19, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

Ha ha yeah, MediaWiki pages would cause SO much more havoc if you vandalized/deleted them than if you vandalized the Main Page or something like that. As long as you're careful not to get blocked (or I guess if you don't care, then go right ahead), admins have the most fun here on April Fools' Day ;)   jj137 (talk) 04:34, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

Hmm, I personally like crush by elephant the best :P If you look through the history of any major MediaWiki page (besides ones like Common.js), about half of the edits were on April Fools' Days alone... wow, what a great community we are.   jj137 (talk) 04:41, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, I guess not. It seems like this year most admins were either acting as silly as usual or trying to put a complete stop to it (I have no idea why, but I remember there was a long ANI thread about it, and 8 admins were blocked). It's just a joke, I don't see why people take it so seriously...   jj137 (talk) 04:49, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

(unindent) Perfectly true. For some reason, it seemed like nothing was being tolerated (whether only admins or everyone could see them), but I just don't see why. You've got a good point, nothing is wrong with a little harmless fun.   jj137 (talk) 17:47, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

Politician stubs

Hi thanks for that. Wow your edit count will be surpassing mine soon the amount of edits you;ve made mostly revertin vandalism in the last few days. Keep up the good work! ♦Blofeld of SPECTRE♦ ^$1,000,000? 09:45, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

Yeah it soon adds up I'm telling you. If you are making edits every few seconds for maintenance tasks, categorical changes, tagging or template work not to mention stubbing work for a period, and discussion of project progression it rockets my edit count. If I was your standard editor who just browses and makes a slight correction or two everynow and again my edit count would be less than 30,000 I;m sure. 30,000 of my edits alone however went towards stubbing french communes at the rate of 5 a minute. It all adds up!! ♦ Dr. Blofeld ♦ ^"Talk"? 12:46, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

Sorry

Sorry, I didn't mean to save those changes. Thanks for letting me know about the sandbox. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.173.151.154 (talk) 23:46, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

Antm 11

Well, the only thing I did was to delete the judges that were write and were false. I thought that it was stupid to write that Dora the Explorer was a judge and I delete it. I don't see where it's nonconstructive! Recently, it was write that the judge was Mario&Luigi and I was like Come on! and I delete it! You should do so! : Fabzzz —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fabzzz (talk • contribs) 23:59, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

They were some, kinda vandalism on the page of ANTM and I decided to delete all of the bad things that were wrong... I don't see why it's such a big deal... :Fabzzz

Huh, why did you sent me a message on the unconstructive I've done? :Fabzzz —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fabzzz (talk • contribs) 00:13, 8 August 2008 (UTC)

Ohhhhh! Yeah, maybe ^^ —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fabzzz (talk • contribs) 00:18, 8 August 2008 (UTC)

Yes, that's it... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fabzzz (talk • contribs) 00:22, 8 August 2008 (UTC)

Well, at the right moment I guest! I need help because, you were able to notice that I don't know how to sign... )-: Like :Fabzzz —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fabzzz (talk • contribs) 00:39, 8 August 2008 (UTC)

Ohhh! I think I get it! Like that! Thank you for that! Fabzzz (talk) 00:46, 8 August 2008 (UTC)Fabzzz

Thank you... AGAIN!

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		For you help in reverting vandalism from my talk page, I award you this barnstar. Thank you again. :) eric (mailbox) 04:59, 8 August 2008 (UTC)

hi

Hi um can you help me with my userboxes and help me tidy up my userpage. Please and thank you!Mooncrest (talk) 20:02, 8 August 2008 (UTC)

Thank you! I'm sorry to be a bother but I haven't been here for a while due to school so I don't know much about wikipedia. Mooncrest (talk) 00:01, 9 August 2008 (UTC) Thank you!!!!!!!!!!!

I dunno. I think fixing my userpage is kinda boring, I like giving warnings and stopping people from vandalizing wikipedia. It's exciting in a way. Mooncrest (talk) 00:09, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

I'm not so much of a nerd because I don't like reading a whole list of things to do I'm more like a go with the flow person. :) I think fighting vandals is exciting because it makes me feel good that I stop someone who was doing horrible things. It's like BAM! I caught you red handed! :) Mooncrest (talk) 00:28, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

I am so sorry, I was trying to undo the last revision which was obviously vandalism. I messed up, however. :( —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kreagan82 (talk • contribs) 03:16, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

need help

Hi, I got into trouble while trying to revert vandalism in Sean Hannity article. Can u pls help. Docku^Hi 03:25, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

If you can get Deacon to come to the talk page, that would be great. I've been trying to get him to discuss his reversions for the past 3 days without success. Benkenobi18 (talk) 03:35, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

J., with all due respect, one revert is not a violation of 3RR, unless someone drastically reedited the rules when I was away. Deacon of Pndapetzim (Talk) 03:37, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

Hey man, why you giving me this hassle? On that link the last revert before August 9 was August 6. What you trying to argue? That I've performed more than one revert to this guy? Yeah, I've performed scores. But 3RR last time I checked was calculated on a 24 hour period. I'd love for you to help out, but this isn't help. Regards, Deacon of Pndapetzim (Talk) 03:51, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

Someone who's uninvolved needs to get involved to sort this out. If not you, then somebody else. Benkenobi18 (talk) 03:45, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

Grats. That's much appreciated. Goodnight.Benkenobi18 (talk) 03:53, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

Deacon continues to revert without a discussion on the talk page. This is unacceptable for any admin on wikipedia. I don't care if he disagrees, he has to talk it out with the editors on the talk page rather then just reverting at will. How am I supposed to work with someone who refuses to discuss his edits? Benkenobi18 (talk) 02:19, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

Yell at me all you want. I haven't reverted Deacon without posting on the talk page. You are right, the page should be List of Roman Catholic dioceses in the UK, which means that the Northern Ireland dioceses get moved into the cat. Thanks. Benkenobi18 (talk) 03:12, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

STOP REVERTING OTHER PPLZ EDITS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

</joke>

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		You have so many of these that one more might just look like a trifle...but I couldn't help but honor a fellow hugglist (teh awesomest, btw). But what are you doing reading this message? Get back out there; the wiki needs you! :) —LaPianista! «talk» 21:57, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

Aye, but the secret lies not in speed; 'tis reason! (actually it lies in shortuct keys...) —LaPianista! ^«talk» 23:13, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

Thankies

WikiThanks

Thanks for helping me :)

Mooncrest (talk) 00:06, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

		The Excellent Userpage Award
		You know what this is for :) Mooncrest (talk) 00:08, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

Re: Protecting pages

Yeah, sorry about that. I hit the button and then found out about the page. Thanks for the link. Xeltran (talk) 05:47, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

Will you help?

Will you help a discussion to resolve the 9/11 problem?

14 days ago or more, I proposed SIX versions to address problems that others noted about the lead sentence. A 7th version was added to the talk page to incorporate the suggestions of an editor. Although there was little discussion, there was some. I added the best of the 7 versions. I am willing to talk, compromise, listen to suggestions. The other 2 editors are aggressive, will not discuss or compromise and simply falsely assert that their version is the consensus when it is not.

Being a moderator of a discussion for a few days may help. Can you help? Presumptive (talk) 06:40, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

User:RandorXeus

Thank you for removing the vandalism from my talk page. Most people ignore vandalism if it is not on an article or not on their own talk page. That was really nice of you. RandorXeus (talk) 14:35, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

Chess game.

Bring it on :p Malinaccier (talk) 23:36, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

Heh, we should play on a real-time server. :) Malinaccier (talk) 23:47, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

This works. Malinaccier (talk) 23:53, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

Social, room "Squirrel Square." Malinaccier (talk) 23:59, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

Re:Huggle weirdness

It's alright, I understand completely :) CL — 23:46, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

Deleting Crank Squad and 2 David Mize's

You can go ahead and delete all 3 of the pages. I was just doing them for fun anyway! —Preceding unsigned comment added by HairyPerry (talk • contribs) 17:14, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

Block

User talk:202.146.8.98 31 hours? With that block history? You sissy ;-) Tan ǀ 39 03:54, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

Sandpit

Love the new ASCII art in the header. It's an elegant solution to a vexing problem. - Dravecky (talk) 06:17, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

It amused me when I saw your edit on my watchlist. Not subtle... but that's the point. I may have to borrow it! -- Flyguy649 ^talk 06:25, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

Re:Your userpage

I replied to your message on my talk page. Thanks! -- RyRy Public (talk) 21:08, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

Thanks...again

Per recent edit on my talk page. Cheers! LaPianista! ^«talk» 03:45, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

LaPianista! ^«talk» has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Cheers, and Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Re: Roundhouse Kick

Geez your fast, I was going to revert back to that SAME edit but you got to it first! :) Happy editing. Nice to know some admins are still awake. eric (mailbox) 05:32, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

32.172.164.174

Hi J.delanoy. FYI see my recent blocking log. [4]. I'll carry on with them as they are very effective, though the individual blocks should perhaps be a bit shorter. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 15:07, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

re:edit

I just got a message saying that I made an edit to a wiki topic. I didn't even acknowledge that I'd even done it. I don't even have an account,let alone know Karl Pilkington. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.107.55.221 (talk) 15:30, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

Hello again

Just dropping a quick note to say that I think you're doing a wonderful job as an administrator. I always knew you'd be an asset to this encyclopedia. Keep up the excellent, excellent work. :) Lradrama 17:34, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

Lradrama has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Lradrama 17:34, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

Yes, it's evening for me, and I should be in bed in over three hours. Don't worry about your image as an inexperienced admin, you're doing a fine job, and in the 9 months I have been an admin, few I have worked with have been as good as you. :) Lradrama 17:45, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

truce

You and zzuzz have been working overtime to chase me down. I feel bad now so I'll call truce. The penis bandit will hang up the browser. --32.157.248.138 (talk) 19:10, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

More block evasion

User:75.168.207.54 :( CL — 03:20, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

Too late, Luna Santin got to it first :) CL — 03:22, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		For always beating me at those oh-so crucial reverts that get a user reported at AIV CL — 03:34, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

/me eats

your damned rollback and huggle. Meanie. ;) KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 03:27, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

Don't get cocky kid! (Stops channeling Han) I've got about 5,500 blocks you got quite a way to go mate. ;) KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 03:35, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

Dunno where you got "5,096" or 2 years and 15 days (well I guess technically speaking I wasn't a sysop for about 5 months due to relinquishing the mop for a while) but this tool shows my block count at 5483 :) KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 05:23, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

lol. Sleep is not a bad thing you know. *Looks at the clock and sees that it's 1:37 in the morning* I got ya beat here though I'm sure! KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 05:38, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

Believe that all you want, if it'll make ya feel better. KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 05:50, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

0_0 ooooookkkkkkk. LOL KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 06:08, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

LOL. Didn't work eh? You should have known better! KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 06:10, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

Hey, Thanks

Thanks for reverting that vandal on my userpage! It's been a little while since it's been protected; I'd like it to be semi-protected again [edit=autoconfirmed, move=sysop]. SchfiftyThree 04:55, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

Hello, J.delanoy. You have new messages at SchfiftyThree's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Thank You from the Bottom of my Heart

Thank you for reverting the vadalism my talk page[5]. I owe you one. --InfamousAmos (talk) 15:37, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

		The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
		For protecting my userpage. InfamousAmos (talk) 17:06, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

Non-controversial speedy deletion

Based on your suggestion for an enhancement to {{admin dashboard}}, I've proposed a new category, see Template talk:Db-meta#Re-jig db-u1.2C db-empty.2C db-g7 and db-g6 into category: Candidates for non-controversial speedy deletion. –xeno (talk) 15:51, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

Clay Davis & IP posting "fictional" email

Hi! I'm unsure how to approach this issue, can you help? User:216.248.131.130, for the last few months, has been putting an email address of fictional character Clay Davis in the infobox name section of the article. Hes received a few warning templates, but I'm not sure what to do considering that its an email to a fictional person. Should one just uw-vandalism him, or uw-unsourced or something else? Or maybe there's a joke/good reason here that I don't understand, having never watched The Wire. Thanks! THEN WHO WAS PHONE? (talk) 21:22, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

heh I never thought of the possibility of email harvesting. Will keep an eye on the page. THEN WHO WAS PHONE? (talk) 00:16, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

Deleating My page

Hey, why did u have 2 deleate my page i made of a friend —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gluestickboy (talk • contribs) 21:57, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

Nice catch on my user talk, I appreciate it! Nothing quite like disruptive editors to keep one's life interesting. Risker (talk) 00:38, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

Template:Sports-videogame-stub

Template:Sports-videogame-stub please do not fully-protect templates without consensus or discussion. You've reverted a vandal to the last version by me, and now I cannot touch it? That is ridiculous. ~ JohnnyMrNinja 01:35, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

I unprotected it, but I fail to see why you are so indignant that I protected it in the first place. You have not made any edits for more than a month, and my "reverting to the last version by you" means utterly nothing. All it means is that you were the last person to make an edit to the page before the vandal did. J.delanoy^gabs_adds 01:37, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

I was not aware that it is common practice to fully-protect things after one act of vandalism with no discussion or consensus. I am not an administrator, but I have maintained and edited most of the video game stub templates. Should I have to become an administrator to decide that a soccer icon is more useful than a golf one? I would not object to semi-protection, but a full-protection without very good reason is just saying that those who aren't sysops have no business touching it, and have nothing of value to add. ~ JohnnyMrNinja 01:48, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

I apologize if that cam across harshly, but please understand that I make many small edits to vital things all the time, and sometimes large edits. Many of those video game stub templates I actually created. It may not seem that way, but full-protection is offensive to a non sysop who does maintenance work. ~ JohnnyMrNinja 01:59, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

No, you were correct. I overreacted full-protecting it right out of hand. I'll semi-protect it, as it is used on a lot of pages. Sorry for the hassle. J.delanoy^gabs_adds 02:02, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

And I'm sorry for hassling you. Countering vandalism isn't easy. I hadn't seen this edit, so overreacting is very understandable. To be honest, I would support semi-protecting the Template namespace, as these sorts of attacks are getting much more frequent. Thanks for switching it to semi-protect, and you have a nice day. ~ JohnnyMrNinja 02:46, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

Block time?

Grossly uncivil IP. You have already met him once. — Realist² 05:10, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

I'm quite sure it's related to this editor, me and bookkeeper work on all the same articles, good friends. We were both attacked in the same manner at the same time. — Realist² 05:13, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

Cheers. I really don't think it was a coincidence that we both hot hit. The other guy is blocked anyway.— Realist² 05:42, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

He's been making more grossly incivil comments over the last 2 days. — Realist² 02:36, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

Can you help me?

I am working in this article, but hasn't categorized, i wanna say you too!. I'm not an English wikipedian, so my english level is limted, if i was make ortography-lacks, can you correct?. --Ravave (talk) 08:21, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

Aquella casa maldita en Amityville —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ravave (talk • contribs) 08:22, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

P.D The name of article is in Spanish, can you change to English Language?, thanks

Thank you, i need improved my English, I saw now in the article, you are put a copyedit, In Spain are one TV Program where the anchorman talks about that house and the book with Carlos Cala, i think in Youtube has a video of that program, could be better like reference? --Ravave (talk) 16:26, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

They star talk about the novel in the minute 2:00. Because you know--Ravave (talk) 16:31, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

OK, Pues mirare por internet a ver si encuentro algo --Ravave (talk) 16:45, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

I can't find anything about a reference, only are reference on the Youtube videos, I was loaded one image of the cover. --Ravave (talk) 18:13, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

OK, Thank you for your help.xD--Ravave (talk) 18:27, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the revert

on my talk page. :-)

Gunnar Hendrich (talk) 17:00, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

Vandalism

Just wondering: What to do about vandalism to a nice page, Elisabeth of Austria?Hohenloh (talk) 21:00, 15 August 2008 (UTC) What to do —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hohenloh (talk • contribs) 20:57, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

Thanks...

for keeping an eye. --jpgordon^∇∆∇∆ 21:27, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

Hot, steamy, rollback action

Hi-- Thanks for adding rollback to my account. As it is, I'm already armed with Vandal Fighter, Friendly, and Twinkle, so I'm not sure if it will add any additional functionality, or will it? Thanks. --Blehfu (talk) 04:11, 16 August 2008 (UTC)

Apologies, but my pianist-trigger fingers are to blame. However, seeing as it is you who granted me rollback privileges in the first place, you have no one to blame but yourself. ;) --Blehfu (talk) 18:45, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

thank you!

Thank you for reverting the vandal on my talk page! --ɔɹǝɐɯʎ!^Talk 12:25, 16 August 2008 (UTC)

Carol Shea-Porter

why did you revert me without providing a reason? Just because some program Huggle told you to, you feel you are justified in not providing a rationale?24.147.52.247 (talk) 02:48, 17 August 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Jordin Sparks - Tattoo.ogg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Jordin Sparks - Tattoo.ogg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:11, 17 August 2008 (UTC)

58.178.105.125

You are fast! By the time I had slapped a Warn4im warning on the talk page and got to AIV, you had already blocked 'im. Nicely done :) Take Care...NeutralHomer • Talk 05:17, 17 August 2008 (UTC)

SOCK?

I think that Jman505 is the same as 72.224.49.240. The talk page for this article reads this as one of the edit summaries:

"00:08, 17 August 2008 72.224.49.240 (Talk) (11,247 bytes) (jman505: Fix this you fuckin bitches) (undo)"

Is there anything I can do? Or you? ——Mr. E. Sánchez ^{Wanna know my story?}/ _{Share yours with me!} 07:20, 17 August 2008 (UTC)

egyptians

I don't get it. why did you undo my edit? i was reversing deletion on the page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.72.192.24 (talk) 18:36, 17 August 2008 (UTC)

I see that's alright. could you undo your edit on the egyptians page then? thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.72.192.24 (talk) 18:39, 17 August 2008 (UTC)

• Why are you reverting back to an IP version which goes against talk page consensus? FunkMonk (talk) 18:46, 17 August 2008 (UTC)

where is the consensus on the talk page to delete most of the page? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.72.192.24 (talk) 18:50, 17 August 2008 (UTC)

• "Most of the page" has not been deleted, there was consensus between everyone but Zerida and his sock-puppets that the article was a duplicate of much of the ancient Egyptians article and that there was too much undue weight to the Pharaonist POV. FunkMonk (talk) 18:53, 17 August 2008 (UTC)

Aww, Gosh Darnit

Now I have to fall on my knees and beg for a temporary semi-protection, don't I ;) NuclearWarfare ^{contact me}_{My work} 20:27, 17 August 2008 (UTC)

Recent IP block

Hi there; you have blocked 62.30.169.162 as an open proxy user. He was recently blocked by user:Sandstein for the same reason, and unblocked when it was determined that he was not in fact working through an open proxy. He has asked to be unblocked. Am I missing something obvious? Obviously, I have not touched the block. --Anthony.bradbury^"talk" 20:52, 17 August 2008 (UTC)

I think that that does not count, but I would be wholly happy to defer to someone with greater expertise. --Anthony.bradbury^"talk" 20:58, 17 August 2008 (UTC)

Possibly Sandstein? --Anthony.bradbury^"talk" 21:01, 17 August 2008 (UTC)

Re. Warning

I was NOT promoting anything at all. The section that referred to "Messin With Sasquatch" by Jack Links Jerky (I did NOT write that section) had no source. Found it and placed it, then got reverted. The source is http://www.messinwithsasquatch.com , which should've been placed long ago, but was not. Appreciate your help, assisstance in this matter. 65.173.104.93 (talk) 21:41, 17 August 2008 (UTC) :)

I don't like Spam either. 65.173.104.93 (talk) 21:42, 17 August 2008 (UTC)

Thanks!

Thanks for the revert on my userpage! LittleMountain5 ^review! 22:49, 17 August 2008 (UTC)

Consider retracting a warning against 75.85.82.78

This edit is not vandalism. The previous edit made (both were rolled back) could be considered misinformation and might be construed as disruptive but the second is clearly a capitalization error. I'm looking through this user's contributions and the record is truly troubling, so I assume that you placed the warning template in good faith, but it seems to have been placed in error. There is some discussion of the user's contributions here. Thanks for your time.

the above was added to the wrong admin. I guess I meant you when I wrote it. :) Part of it doesn't apply since you started the discussion of the user's contributions. No action needed unless you think it is worth it to retract the warning. Thanks. Protonk (talk) 23:51, 17 August 2008 (UTC)

Range"tracking" IP ranges

Hi there!

I was just itching to ask an admin if there was a way to track IP ranges, as explained here. In fact, I asked one, but that user didn't know and told me to ask someone else may be.

Can there ever be such a tool that can track the edits of an entire IP range? Because, you know, admins can rangeblock extreme cases, but there really should be a way to keep a good hold of vandals within the range so you don't have to block innocent people on the way. It no longer appears to be effective to track IP contributions individually as they can change their IPs in such a short time if they know how to. I already experimented with that and found out that there was a way to do so (at least on Vista, I don't have a Mac or XP) ...however, while I was easily able to change my IP address, I noticed that it is simply impossible to change the IP range.

It's just a thought, but I really feel that it's gotten out of hand—if I were a vandal, being anonymous would have more benefits simply because you can evade blocks within seconds! Thanks and best of luck, ~ Troy (talk) 01:44, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

No problem ...that's a great start for my search. Actually, if you really want to know what I was up to, I was trying to program RegEx on JavaScript in User:Lupin/badwords (Aaargh!) to make sure that I could track vandalism more thoroughly with that tool. The most intruiging gadget that I recently found was this Cross-Wiki Global Contributions tool, which I came across today. You should try it out some time. Thanks for the help! ~ Troy (talk) 02:24, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

Yet Another Barnstar for Your Trophy Shelf

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		I had to applaud your vigilance in protecting the article about The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints from its frequent vandalism. You're amassing quite a collection of these things! RobertJWalker | Talk 15:05, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

User:82...

Hi again. It almost seems like a coincidence when I asked you about IP ranges the other day when 82. ... vandalized my user & talk page earlier on, as well as Luna Santin's User and talk page, and then your user page as User:82.132.136.195. The moment you see that guy blubbering about how great his IPhone is, I suggest you give him a multipleIPs warning. As a matter of fact, recent IPs that I noticed changin' their addresses convinced me to look for a way to spot them.

...let me know if you see anything suspicious. Best Regards, ~ Troy (talk) 19:26, 18 August 2008 (UTC) :-)

That's just it - people are using their iPhones to IP Hop. --FilmFan69 (talk) 21:56, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

Tuesday Wilkinson

Well done on keeping on-top of Tuesday Wilkinson. I wanted to suggest the user for a block. Is there any way for an average wikipedian to flag a user for a block to the administrators? i appreciate your help -- a relatively new wikipedian. I have your talk page on my watch. Plhofmei (talk) 23:41, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for reverting the stupidity on my talk page. Kids. Shrug. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 00:05, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

Barnstar

		The Half Barnstar
		Uh-oh, looks like you only half-deleted this one. Next stop: Main Page! mboverload@ 00:59, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

why did u delete my page?

i hadnt finished it i simply need sleep- after all, i am human- so had to leave it at that stage. i do deserve a page but at the end of the day, other places will make sites about me and i'll make sure yours isnt one of them.

I'm not sure what you are refering to exactly but I can assure you that people who have to make their own Wikipedia page do not deserve one =) --mboverload@ 01:01, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

Anti-Vandalism Barnstar

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		You've consistently been beating me to repairing vandalism. Instead of getting jealous ad you're Superman-like speed and your awesomeness, I've decided to give you a barnstar that you deserve. Thanks for the work you do, it definitely makes Wikipedia a better place. RandorXeus (talk) 05:16, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

Silly Administrator, don't you know that its 1:30am your time as well? Then again, I notice you on alot around this time, so I guess its a good time for Wikipedia editing, huh? RandorXeus (talk) 05:29, 19 August 2008 (UTC) Its always a good time to edit Wikipedia, as long as your edits are legit and true.

Re:Huggle

Sure. I stopped using it a few minutes ago but I don't mind ;)   jj137 (talk) 16:06, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

Hah, go right ahead. And I just tried it out again... wow, it took about 1 second to notice the difference. :)   jj137 (talk) 16:12, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

Haha, don't worry, I'll be careful. But who exactly would take your head off?   jj137 (talk) 16:17, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

Hmm, well in that case, chances are my head would be taken off first for actually making the mistakes. :P   jj137 (talk) 16:25, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

Nirvanix

Hi J.delanoy,

Thanks for reverting Nirvanix vandalism. You might want to check out Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Mharvey23 as I'm not sure what needs to be done from here - they (Nirvanix's PR company?) have added the AfD template but have not yet created the corresponding entry in AfD. It could be removed as vandalism presumably, only the template says it must not be removed. Please help. MediaMob (talk) 18:34, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

Ok the AfD nomination was eventually created; you may want to weigh in on this one, or not. MediaMob (talk) 18:50, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

User:Playwert

Yeah, I was thinking the account looks like it was compromised. Thanks. Corvus cornix_talk 21:38, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

Hello!

Why did you remove my contribution? 68.0.119.139 (talk) 02:51, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for reverting my talk page. --  Darth Mike  _{(Talk • Contribs)} 08:12, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

Re:Huggle

That depends.... what do you want to do to it?!? ... discospinster _talk 13:23, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

Sure, go for it. ... discospinster _talk 14:09, 21 August 2008 (UTC)

Chess

Sorry about that, I was a bit confused. LegoK^ontribsT^alkM 16:47, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

Query re possible block evasion

Hi there - wondered if you'd take a look at this for me. The user has made no mainspace edits as of writing this, but he appears to be admitting a block evasion and you're obviously not on his Christmas card list. I'm reluctant to barge in, poke him with a metaphorical stick when he's not vandalising, warn him for a relatively mild personal attack and report him for block evasion. I wondered whether you'd have a clue to his previous ID, and what (if anything) needs to be done at this stage. Thanks Karenjc 19:04, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

1995-96 nhl season

I was trying to delete the standings in the 1995-96 nhl season page when I noticed there were standings for two different years. Both the 1995-96 standings as well as the 1994-95 standings are in this page. I tried to delete the 1994-95 standings but it said that this was considered vandlism. Could you tell me what to do in this situation? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tedster1357 (talk • contribs) 23:15, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

Ladder Golf

On college campuses, where ladder golf is frequently played, the game is commonly referred to as "Testicle Toss." Google the term if you do not believe me. I know the word testicle is not prohibited on wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.202.212.27 (talk) 23:54, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

Republican Party

Political joke from a Democrat. Sorry. Won't happen again.--74.95.135.46 (talk) 00:02, 21 August 2008 (UTC)

Ostrander, Hawaii

Its been deleted four times in as many minutes. I would suggest salting the article. Best, --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 19:17, 22 August 2008 (UTC)

External link to "Scheduled Caste" and "Ram Vilas Paswan"

Hi

 Thanks for sending the message. You are contributing a lot.

 However, I do not agree why you have removed the link. Those links are highly relevant to "Scheduled Castes" and "Ram Vilas Paswan". Content is really relevant. Otherwise, users would not be clicking on those links. I am not directing them to my personal shopping site. I am directing them to articles and blogs on the SAME topic.

Please add the link back. I would appreciate that.

thanks samatha Samathawiki (talk) 13:55, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

Thank you

...for restoring my user page. Looks like I need to update the counter :) De728631 (talk) 20:56, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

Possible Hack?

It seems that very recently I have been repeatedly (in separate instances) warned over vandalism on the Cavan Article. I do not recall making any of these edits. I'm worried that I may have been hacked and was wondering what you or I could do. Thank you. James Brown Monster, (talk) 00:09, 25 August 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for that! My password is changed. I think I know who might have done it and will ask them about it. --James Brown Monster, 00:57, 25 August 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jamesbrownmonster (talk • contribs)

Block

Can you block this guy? He keeps adding unsourced info, final warn, done it twice after final warn. Shapiros10 ^{contact me}_{My work} 23:33, 25 August 2008 (UTC)

User Attack

Please tell the user to stop editing my verified posts. I worked hard to find that information and it all abides by Wiki's terms. Thank you —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fftest12 (talk • contribs) 23:45, 25 August 2008 (UTC)

hi

please don't be mad at me i wanna make the good school better but don't be mad and please remove my blocking! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Benjamin zygorodimos (talk • contribs) 01:31, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

don't you ever block me and you know why?we need the edit and we need to study and learn how to use the computer and we need some of the account and plz don't block mark tonkin account! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Benjamin zygorodimos (talk • contribs)

thank you very much for helping and please make me a admin —Preceding unsigned comment added by Benjamin zygorodimos (talk • contribs)

Rollback

Hello. I saw your name on a list of admins who were willing to consider granting access to rollback. I am interested in it. I haven't been an editor that long (not sure if there is a minimum number of edits or not), but I do spent a lot of time doing counter-vandalism stuff and I think that it would be useful. I also reviewed the page to make sure I understood when it should and should not be used. Please let me know if you'd consider this and, if not, what type of behavior you'd like to see to consider it in the future. Thanks! Movingboxes (talk) 06:05, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

Header added

The Liverpool Senior Cup page had been amended prior to myself editing it to post events that had not taken place

e.g stating that AFC Liverpool won the trophy in 2009. Clearly the event hasn't taken place.

In attempting to add in a link to extensive results and lineups for Liverpool FC in this competition I also tried to edit the page to read correctly. The link previsouly entered by AFC Liverpool had actually hindered the pages main look and feel. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Liverweb (talk • contribs) 14:30, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

I've just seen your update on my talk page and although I see and agree that you don't know everything about everything I initially tried to edit the page to remove wrongly entered spam information. Entering a winner for 2009 is wrong as the competition hasn't even started and was blatant spam in my opinion.

Having removed that I actually tried to add a link in as well to Liverweb which actually has listings of every single game Liverpool have played in the Liverpool Senior Cup plus lineups and scorers. This is surely extra data for wiki? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Liverweb (talk • contribs) 14:40, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the replay I realise I added a number of updates in one go and accept wiki is more than just a link to websites. In terms of the multiple links I can only apologise from that point although can assure you that the links are to very specific areas of a website - player profile pages which include specific data referring to an individual.

As for the Senior Cup link that goes to specific archive yeared data. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Liverweb (talk • contribs) 14:47, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

RE: My talk page

No worries! My tolerance for the shenanigans of that particular banned editor is pretty short these days. Perhaps we need an updated version of WP:RBI that is delete-block-ignore. --Kralizec! (talk) 15:45, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

Vandalism

Hi, someone was spamming a forum about redirecting your secondary talk page, which I guess was intended as a back-up in case of vandalism. What, exactly, did you do to merit all of this? :| Yohan euan o4 (talk) 16:27, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

It was 4chan's /b/; and it wasn't generating a lot of interest, which is somewhat evident I guess. Yohan euan o4 (talk) 11:36, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

Semi protection

Hi, can you extend the protection please, even my sandbox is being attack and it won't be long before the protection is deactivated. Cheers. — Realist² 19:32, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

Replied at mine. — Realist² 21:56, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

Look good, if anything pop's up I'll let you know. Our next alternative is to move protect every article relating to Michael Jackson and any other article I touch, lol. I hope this goes away at some point. — Realist² 22:14, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for not protecting your user page- it gives us non-admin types great rollback practice[6]. :) Erik the Red 2 (AVE·CAESAR) 01:22, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

Revert of my edit to a page

Hello,

I recently realized that if you type "Leana Lopez" or "Leana López" into the wikipedia search engine, it redirects to "Histrionic Personality Disorder." My friend (username Lkutch14) and I tried to remove this redirect, because it is inappropriate and inaccurate (and my name). We did this on these two pages: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Leana_Lopez&redirect=no and http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Leana_L%C3%B3pez&redirect=no. Please, please allow me to remove this offensive redirect. Thank you.

Pajaritaleanita (talk) 02:46, 28 August 2008 (UTC)Pajaritaleanita

I have deleted both redirects as attack pages. Useight (talk) 02:53, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

Thank you! I'm definitely happy to have that gone :) Pajaritaleanita (talk) 03:02, 28 August 2008 (UTC)Pajaritaleanita

Haha, thank you!  :-)Lkutch14 (talk) 03:03, 28 August 2008 (UTC)LKutch14

No problem, I'm only here to help. Useight (talk) 03:04, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

Czechoslovaks × Czechs and Slovaks

That was a nice hockey :-D
I recently made an article about term "Czechoslovaks" which can explain more than I did in article about Czechoslovakia. Enjoy ;-)
--Niusereset 28.VIII. MMVIII, 18:40 CEST

Revert of my edit to Washington, D.C.

J Delanoy, I will report you if you do that again. Anonymous doesn't mean worthless. Washington DC was renamed to the District of Columbia in 1871. The page should contain the correct name. The source for this info was already cited below. Do you have an alternate agenda or were you just being careless? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.74.225.18 (talk • contribs) at 16:54, August 28, 2008

I'm with J Delanoy. "Washington DC, (formally District of Columbia)" is *fine*. "Washington, DC" is the name of the article, for goodness' sake. "District of Columbia", the "official" name, is just a redirect. JohnInDC (talk) 16:57, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

I am as well and J.delanoy beat me to that particular revert as I was pushing the button. "Washington D.C." is the title of the article and the commonly used name; we don't call Los Angeles "El Pueblo de Nuestra Señora la Reina de los Ángeles de la Porciúncula" or Bangkok "Krung Thep", whatever the official designation may be. – iridescent 17:49, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

I blocked the IP. When their first edit has "asshole" in the ES, my tolerance plummets ;-) Tan ǀ 39 17:51, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

Warning

This image is blatantly stolen from the article Wikipedia:Edits_Per_Day

File:Twinkle cat.jpg

Concerned cat doesn't want you to steamroll other people's edits with Twinkle. Don't listen to him. He's evil.

-- Works for Huggle too.... CanadianLinuxUser (talk) 18:48, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

Herbal Tea

I tried to look something up today, at the top of the page a message appeared stating that I had vandalized an article on "Herbal Tea." I assure you I did not. I don't think that I have ever made any edits on any articles at all. I had a heck of a time even figuring out how to leave this message. I'm the only user on this computer at this I.P. If you could help me figure out what's going on I'd appreciate it.

dougismyson (at) yahoo (dot) com —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.242.135.7 (talk) 03:09, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

Good job!

Hi, J.delanoy! Just dropping by to say you did a great job reverting vandalism today. You beat me to it several times.

Chamal ^Talk has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Cheers, and Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Chamal ^Talk 05:33, 30 August 2008 (UTC)

I am the writter of Knowledge Based/Knowledge Acquisition page I do have some referencs and I would be greatful if you could restore the page please.If not, can I restore the page myself?Richardlord50 (talk) 12:14, 30 August 2008 (UTC)

Block evading kid

Hi, I saw you'd blocked User:72.255.24.43 for block evasion (as a puppet of User:72.255.5.180); you might want to do the same to User:72.255.47.141 - see contributions. Cheers, --Bonadea (talk) 16:40, 30 August 2008 (UTC)

Comment to own post: Yeah, well, given the party that's going on in Da Drought 3, The Leak, Tha Carter, Tha Carter II and possibly some other mysteriously named articles, where a bunch of IPs and registered users are adding the same nonsense, blocking one single IP probably isn't going to do much good. --Bonadea (talk) 17:00, 30 August 2008 (UTC)

FYI

I saw that on this page you posted "This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Beauty." This user vandalized this page today. I just wanted to let you know. I'm not really sure what I should have done about this, if anything. -Skunkboy74 (talk) 04:01, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

me

how am i vandalizing by complementing someone? get a life instead of editing people's edits. jeez —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thehauss (talk • contribs) 04:21, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

Texas Rangers fans

Nothing like angry Texas Rangers fans trying to vent on Dale Scott, Chone Figgins, and Mark Teixeira. I get the anger at the umpire, but the two players had zero to do with the call. The Rangers are more or less out of the running, so I don't get why the anger. Oh well, they won't be doing anything for the umpire's article for awhile. =) -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:01, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

issue

There's an issue with blocking the 195.229.235.41 ip address because its the proxy ip inside the united arab emirates, i.e all ip's from the united arab emirates are blocked this way.

be sure to unblock this ip. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.229.237.36 (talk) 21:10, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

Request

At Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion/2008 August 30, I listed Image:Imslayout.PNG to be deleted. Some guy approved. Can you please delete this image? A perfect .svg image already exist. This image is obsolete and should be deleted. Noble12345 (talk) 23:37, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

What if there is no consensus? Noble12345 (talk) 23:47, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

It should be deleted. How can you keep an obsolete image when there is a better image that is available? That makes no sense. Noble12345 (talk) 23:52, 31 August 2008 (UTC)