User talk:IyataYada

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome![edit]

Hello, IyataYada, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as デヴィッド・ラザルス, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Chrissymad ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 18:53, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, デヴィッド・ラザルス[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, デヴィッド・ラザルス. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – David Lazarus. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at David Lazarus – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Chrissymad ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 18:53, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Contested deletion[edit]

This article should not be speedy deleted as being recently created, having no relevant page history and duplicating an existing English Wikipedia topic, because... (I do not want this article to be classified into the English Wikipedia but I intended this article to be a Japanese one. But, unfortunately, I don't know how to send to Japanese Wikipedia. Help me! Thanks!) --IyataYada (talk) 19:06, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I moved this to ja:デヴィッド・ラザルス and connected it with David Lazarus (Q5236387). I think it is safe to delete this. I will cross post this to the user's talk page. Blue Rasberry (talk) 19:12, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I think you were trying to post to Japanese Wikipedia. I copied your content to ja:デヴィッド・ラザルス. Can you please check there and see if you can edit that?

Every Wikipedia has its own language content. I expect your page to be deleted here, but it should be okay there. If you have questions I might be able to answer, but I hope you understand, most of us only know English here. Does my moving the page to Japanese work for you? Thanks for the translation. Please reply. Blue Rasberry (talk) 19:12, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Naosaku Takahashi (May 21)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jeromeenriquez was:
This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Please add references and write that section well.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Jeromeenriquez (talk) 17:00, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, IyataYada! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Jeromeenriquez (talk) 17:00, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Naosaku Takahashi (July 4)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robertsky were:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
bulk of the source is from his published autobiography, which is defined as a primary source on wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
– robertsky (talk) 08:18, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Naosaku Takahashi (July 6)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
needs independent sources
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 08:51, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Naosaku Takahashi has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Naosaku Takahashi. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 16:43, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Naosaku Takahashi has been accepted[edit]

Naosaku Takahashi, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

– robertsky (talk) 09:06, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

November 2021[edit]

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Naosaku Takahashi, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Johntalk 18:26, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jack Betts edit[edit]

I have reverted your addition of a date of birth and a place of birth to Jack Betts because IMDb is not a reliable source for use in Wikipedia articles. Please see WP:IMDB. You might also want to read WP:USERGENERATED for names of some other websites that are similarly unreliable. Eddie Blick (talk) 01:43, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! IyataYada (talk) 19:09, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
You're welcome. Eddie Blick (talk) 01:12, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:IyataYada&oldid=1127312166"