User talk:Inspector Eevee
Index
|
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
Welcome![edit]
Hi Inspector Eevee! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.
Happy editing! Drmies (talk) 21:09, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
A quick tip[edit]
Hi, I have noticed your contributions and since you want to fight vandalism, I recommend that you use Twinkle. To use this, go to your preferences, gadgets and use command + f and type Twinkle. Enable it, scroll to the bottom and hit save. Then enjoy HOW FAST it is to use Twinkle. Bigeshjen (talk) 16:20, 16 June 2022 (UTC)Bigeshjen
- @Bigeshjen I can't use Twinkle until my account is 4 days old. Thanks for the tip! Inspector Eevee (talk) 16:45, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
- @Bigeshjen Yes, I have begun using Twinkle. It's a very good tool. Thanks!
February 2023[edit]
This [1] is a personal attack, because it makes a false accusation without evidence. See WP:NPA Sweet6970 (talk) 10:28, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
- @Sweet6970: I don't want to start an argument, because if you look at the message I sent you it says that
you currently appear to be engaged in an edit war, the key word being appear. It was not meant to be a personal attack, and I am sorry if you mistook it as such. However, as a result of your argument with the other user in the talk page and the reverts, I just wanted to post a friendly reminder on your talk page so things do not escalate. Even though you reverted once, the other user reverted your version back, so I had to leave a message on both talk pages. I hope you understand. Inspector Eevee (talk) 01:23, 7 February 2023 (UTC)- No, it does not ‘appear’ that I was engaged in an edit war. You can read the template you left on my Talk page, which says that edit warring means
that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree.
. So it is obviously wrong to place this template on the page of someone who has only reverted once. You knew it is a baseless accusation. You did not have to place such a template on my Talk page. Don’t do it. Sweet6970 (talk) 10:30, 8 February 2023 (UTC)- @Sweet6970 Sorry for the late response. I was only trying to prevent an edit war. You claim that I know it is a baseless accusation, which it is not, and therefore are accusing me. I don't want to argue any further, and the template on your talk page was only meant to be a friendly reminder. (By the way I meant to use the softer wording for the template but I misclicked.) Furthermore, based on your language on the article's talk page, you were poised to revert the other editor's changes again. I was acting in good faith, and since you clearly don't believe that and keep attacking me, you're violating Wikipedia's policies. Inspector Eevee (talk) 21:39, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
- I see you are now trying to justify your baseless attack on me by telling me what I was about to do (!) The template you placed on my Talk page cannot possibly be interpreted as a ‘friendly reminder’. It could only create unpleasantness – which it has done. By placing that template on my Talk page, you were making a personal attack on me. You have not apologised. Just stop it. Sweet6970 (talk) 12:46, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
- @Sweet6970 Alright, fine. I apologize for putting the warning on your Talk page and your misinterpretation of it. I still think you shouldn't have responded to my reminder in this way, misguided or not, and you too should apologize. Inspector Eevee (talk) 02:12, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
- And also if you look at the page history, there seems to be an minor edit war in progress now. Inspector Eevee (talk) 02:15, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
- @Sweet6970 Alright, fine. I apologize for putting the warning on your Talk page and your misinterpretation of it. I still think you shouldn't have responded to my reminder in this way, misguided or not, and you too should apologize. Inspector Eevee (talk) 02:12, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
- I see you are now trying to justify your baseless attack on me by telling me what I was about to do (!) The template you placed on my Talk page cannot possibly be interpreted as a ‘friendly reminder’. It could only create unpleasantness – which it has done. By placing that template on my Talk page, you were making a personal attack on me. You have not apologised. Just stop it. Sweet6970 (talk) 12:46, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
- @Sweet6970 Sorry for the late response. I was only trying to prevent an edit war. You claim that I know it is a baseless accusation, which it is not, and therefore are accusing me. I don't want to argue any further, and the template on your talk page was only meant to be a friendly reminder. (By the way I meant to use the softer wording for the template but I misclicked.) Furthermore, based on your language on the article's talk page, you were poised to revert the other editor's changes again. I was acting in good faith, and since you clearly don't believe that and keep attacking me, you're violating Wikipedia's policies. Inspector Eevee (talk) 21:39, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
- No, it does not ‘appear’ that I was engaged in an edit war. You can read the template you left on my Talk page, which says that edit warring means