User talk:Iluxion

Hello, Iluxion, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Manual of Style
Also feel free to make test edits in the sandbox.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 23:51, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, your really nice. Thaanks for the welcome here.--Iluxion (talk) 00:02, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Iluxion (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am requesting the deletion of the username "23prootie's God". I have no connection with that person whatsoever, and I personally denounce in every possible way their choice of name for a username. As a devoutly practicing Catholic, I deeply insulted and saddened not only by their impersonation of me but also by their intention to hurt me by attacking my beliefs. I think this has gone out of hand, and I regret that my passion has attracted trolls. I have waited till the sockpuppetry case to end before I replied because I feel that that would be inappropriate since it has appeared that I have lost all credibility that I have been branded along with mons3ters such as the impersonator above. Please delete that username. I have no wish to associate myself with it. Thank you.

Decline reason:

First, I don't believe you. Second, we cannot "delete" accounts as that violates our licensing policy. –MuZemike 08:00, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Could you do anything that would disassociate me from that account. I am going to take responsibility on the others but not that one. It appears that the sockpuppetry clerks are not so stringent. I wonder how many times did they make mistakes.--Iluxion (talk) 08:14, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Iluxion (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

That name is blasphemous and libelous, and I believe that that name is used to personally attack me and my beliefs. It appears to be me but you look closely and read the statements left by that thing, it is nothing compared to what I have written. I do not write like that and I deny their statements. Please remove any association of that person to me. I truly feel insulted. There is a policy against the use of "profanity" in usernames. It is stated at the username create page. Blasphemous usernames should encompass what is defined as "profanity", otherwise it would be pointless to have such policy. I wish that this issue be addressed and that username be deleted.

Decline reason:

In the first place, you're using the unblock template for a request which has nothing to do with unblocking your account -- please stop doing that. Secondly, you are correct that there's a policy against disruptive usernames, but such accounts are typically blocked from editing, not deleted (note the account in question is already blocked); there is no routine process by which Wikipedia user accounts may be deleted. If you'd like to see your account unblocked, please take a moment to review our guide to appealing blocks and address the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/23prootie/Archive#Report date February 20 2010, 17:06 (UTC). – Luna Santin (talk) 09:53, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.