User talk:Hrvoje Simic
Re: Yugoslav wars[edit]
I wanted to apologize regarding my most recent revert. At first I did not notice that you had changed wording to include summary of all conflicts. Although I do not necessarily think the way it's worded right now is the most neutral way possible, overall you have been doing a good job improving up this article. I need to start to focus my efforts more on Wikipedia since I do not have much time to spend here and I do act a little hasty at times. Regards Laughing Man 17:30, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
- Wow, after this now you go ahead with such a massive change? Now I think you're pushing it a little too much with your POV, as you've removed alot of information from the timeline, and push it to another article. Laughing Man 21:46, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Northern Exposure logo.gif)[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:Northern Exposure logo.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 01:50, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:08, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
URI scheme listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect URI scheme. Since you had some involvement with the URI scheme redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs) 22:25, 14 November 2017 (UTC)