User talk:Hiwilms/2019/May
Help in making Ninoy Aquino station article more comprehensive to be reinstated.[edit]
Hi,
I noticed that you have been reverting vandalism by User:Very.deep.thinker regarding Ninoy Aquino station. Unfortunately, the admin that went through the article deleted it with the premise that he would reinstate it only if it is comprehensive enough. With that said, I would like to seek your assistance towards achieving such so we can reinstate the article. Please feel free to edit here User:Korean Rail Fan/sandbox/Ninoy Aquino station
Thanks!
Korean Rail Fan 16:07, 12 May 2019 (UTC)
- Hi! I have also made a separate sandbox on my user space because the draft is in your user space. I’ll now place my edits on your sandbox for collective editing. Thanks a lot! —Hiwilms (talk) 16:34, 12 May 2019 (UTC)
2019 election results[edit]
Hello Hiwilms. It appears to me you've reverted my edit. Even though Manila is still missing one precinct, remember that I put a template above the article stating about the information changes. I am however, watching and following closely the election results and the article is being updated from time to time. Please refer to the sources I've provided for.
- Edit: I am now asking you, what appears to be something that is not constructive in my edits?
PH 0447 (talk) 09:57, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
NPR Newsletter No.18[edit]
Hello Hiwilms/2019,
- WMF at work on NPP Improvements
Niharika Kohli, a product manager for the growth team, announced that work is underway in implementing improvements to New Page Patrol as part of the 2019 Community Wishlist and suggests all who are interested watch the project page on meta. Two requested improvements have already been completed. These are:
- Allow filtering by no citations in page curation
- Not having CSD and PRODs automatically marked as reviewed, reflecting current consensus among reviewers and current Twinkle functionality.
- Reliable Sources for NPP
Rosguill has been compiling a list of reliable sources across countries and industries that can be used by new page patrollers to help judge whether an article topic is notable or not. At this point further discussion is needed about if and how this list should be used. Please consider joining the discussion about how this potentially valuable resource should be developed and used.
- Backlog drive coming soon
Look for information on the an upcoming backlog drive in our next newsletter. If you'd like to help plan this drive, join in the discussion on the New Page Patrol talk page.
- News
- Following a request for comment, the subject-specific notability guideline for pornographic actors and models (WP:PORNBIO) was removed; in its place, editors should consult WP:ENT and WP:GNG.
- Discussions of interest
- A request for bot approval for a bot to patrol two kinds of redirects
- There has been a lot discussion about Notability of Academics
- What, if anything, would a SNG for Softball look like
Six Month Queue Data: Today – 7242 Low – 2393 High – 7250
Stay up to date with even more news – subscribe to The Signpost.
Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.
Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of DannyS712 (talk) at 19:17, 17 May 2019 (UTC)