User talk:HiFiGuy

Hello. I'm sorry, but there is no one available to take your call. Please leave a message after the beep.

-HiFiGuy 20:49, 27 January 2006 (UTC)

*beep*

Recede vs cede

• re:Treaty of Shimonoseki - the correct term was definitely receded - not ceded... in context, as the result of the triple intervention. The treaty with Japan ceded the Liaodong to Japan. I've fixed it. 24.61.229.179 14:19, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)

VfD Nominations, voting, etc

Please remember to sign your name after you nominate an article for deletion or vote! :)

(from my talk page welcoming me as a new user: Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date.) Jawz 06:39, 17 January 2006 (UTC)

New Look (policy)

You're welcome. Glad you approve. It hit me on Feb. 3 that I might be able to recast a 30-year-old paper into an article. Then I found that you had split off the New Look (policy) entry into a stub article only a couple of days before. I wanted to do the article in a single sitting, but it wasn't feasible. I've also been trying to update my earlier work with new information, which has led to some errors in aligning dates. I plan to keep fine-tuning it. I've decided that the New Look was real, but that Massive Retaliation was mostly dangerous blather. Also, Ike was a lot more hands-on that he generally gets credit for. -- Cuppysfriend 24:18, 9 February 2006 (UTC)

Canola

I've replied on the cottonseed oil page to your comment re GM canola. In short - the assertion wasn't (to my reading, at least) that Canola was invented by genetic engineering, but that it is now widely subject to GM - a fact that's not really contestable. Waitak 15:02, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

Actually, I was also wondering if there could be a citation as to "who says it's one of the big four GM crops?" -HiFiGuy 17:18, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

Found a reference for you. Take a look at cottonseed oil now and see what you think. Waitak 11:32, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

Academic fencing

I saw on the talk page of Academic fencing that you were interested in completing and/or improving that article. Apparently User:Kresspahl did not dare to do so. I have just started. It would be nice if someone who is interested in that exotic subject would polish up my English (it is not my native language) and check if this can be understood by someone who was not born in Central Europe. Best regards, --Rabe! 20:18, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

Founders College

I'm sorry if you were disappointed that the article was deleted. However, let me explain the procedure. A user called Angusmclellan had placed a notice on it saying "(prod: crystall ballism, even the site of the college is not decided)". When such a notice is placed and remains there for five days, administrators have a duty to decide whether the article should be deleted. I looked at the article and decided, on the evidence in front of me, that it seemed worthy of deletion. I was influenced by the fact that in the six days since the notice had been placed, there had been no edits attempting to address the deficiencies in the article (indeed, no edits at all other than an automatic one by a robot editor). If you feel that you can now write an article worthy of retention on Wikipedia, please do so. If you want me to extract the text of the article and send it to you as a basis for this, I am happy to do so.--Runcorn 13:23, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

IP block exempt

I have granted your account an exemption from IP blocking. This will allow you to edit through full blocks affecting your IP address when you are logged in.

Please read the page Wikipedia:IP block exemption carefully, especially the section on IP block exemption conditions.

Note in particular that you are not permitted to use this newly-granted right to edit Wikipedia via anonymous proxies, or disruptively. If you do, or there is a serious concern of abuse, then the right may be removed by any administrator.

Appropriate usage and compliance with the policy may be checked periodically, due to the nature of block exemption, and block exemption will be removed when no longer needed (for example, when the block it is related to expires).

I hope this will enhance your editing, and allow you to edit successfully and without disruption.-- Cirt (talk) 04:44, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:58, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, HiFiGuy. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, HiFiGuy. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)