User talk:Hebohne90

Welcome![edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia, Hebohne90! Thank you for your contributions. I am There'sNoTime and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! -- There'sNoTime ^{(to explain)} 20:26, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Lyonbrotherz[edit]

Congratulations on your work on Draft:Lyonbrotherz. You are off to a good start. I edited the article originally because I saw a bug report of the spurious self-closed tag <small />, and once I was there, I fixed a few other things. I see you have edited Gronau, North Rhine-Westphalia, which suggests that the link in the article [[Gronau]] should be changed to [[Gronau, North Rhine-Westphalia|Gronau]], which would display as Gronau, and as you can see, when you click on it, you go to Gronau, North Rhine-Westphalia. And with that, you could remove the {{Disambiguation needed}} template. Again, you're off to a great start! I hope you continue to contribute to Wikipedia. —Anomalocaris (talk) 21:44, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please except my congratulations too. PS: It was me who welcomed you first. :) Feel free to drop me a note.--Biografer (talk) 22:34, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about League of Lyons[edit]

Hello, Hebohne90,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Elmidae and it's nice to meet you:-)

I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, League of Lyons should be deleted. Your comments are welcome over Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/League of Lyons .

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Elmidae}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Thanks,

Elmidae (talk · contribs) 16:46, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (August 2)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Just blatant advertising.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Hebohne90/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Hebohne90/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 17:04, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Hebohne90! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 17:04, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:Hebohne90/sandbox[edit]

Hello, Hebohne90. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:02, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]